Why not use LPS/SOX, instead of HPS?

beginningbotanist420

Well-Known Member
After doing a little reseach on the internet for a new 600w HPS, i came across this link and it made me wonder. A High-Pressure Sodium lamp only emits 150 lm/W [lumens per watt], where a Low-Pressure Sodium/Sodium Oxygen lamp emits somewhere between 183-200 lm/W [or about 190 on average]. The largest LPS/SOX bulb on the link below was a 180W, which puts out somewhere between 32940 lumens and 36000 lumens. Although this is 4560-1500 lumens below the 37500 of a 250w HPS bulb, you are saving 70w, [plus these lumens can be made up with a CFL or 2]. If i were to purchase 3 180w LPS/SOX bulbs (~103,500 lumens) instead of a 600w HPS (~90,000 lumens), i would be saving 60w and be putting out ~13,500 MORE lumens! Also, with the saved 40w, i could throw in a blue-ish 42w CFL to balance out the predominantly red spectrum of the LPS/SOX.

A simple google search by "low pressure sodium bulbs" returned this link: Low Pressure Sodium Lamps - ProLighting.com.

Here is a link showing lighting efficientcy of lumens per watt Luminous efficacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The only thing that is slowing down my decision is the lack of resources saying this is a possibility/good idea. After about an hour of research, no where on the web have i found anything that even suggests that this is a feasible idea. Either i'm right and i'm stricking the surface of a new discovery, or, i'm just completely wrong.

One reason i think this idea might be wrong is the color temperature of a 180w LPS/SOX bulb is 1800K. The lowest temperature that i can find to be useful in plant growth is 2700K, which is used for flowering. But, as mentioned earlier, could this be balanced out with a 6500K CFL?



What do you think? Feasible idea, or piece of shit idea? and why?

:peace:
 
The spectrum on LPS lights is much much too narrow. It makes no sense to use one over a HPS , while yes they are brighter in Lm/w but the plants cant use as much of the light so it defeats the purpose. At least thats what I was told.
 
Nevermind. After running the numbers, you only save about 15 dollars if using 540w LPS instead of a 600w HPS, on a 4 week veg cycle on 18/6 and a 8 week flower cycle of 12/12.

  • ((WxT)/1,000)x$KwH= Savings; where W=Dif. of Watts, T=Time run, and $KwH= Price of Kilowatt/hour (national verage is $.15)
  • (((600-540)x((18x7x4)+(12x7x8 )))/1,000)x.15= $10.584
Final decision: NOT WORTH IT!

Sorry for the waste of your 5 minutes. :wall:

:peace:
 
Back
Top