Why is the Far right Devoid of any original thoughts?

They get told what to
-Think
- Be outraged about
- what to believe

Really all you ever do is throw up the latest Rage Command from your tea baggie handlers that are making major bank off your stupidity.
Very rarely do I see a original thought among any of you.
Whenever you get caught passing on the latest crap from the Republican Bullshit mountain. You just deflect to some other equally absurd debunked premise.
You are not even fun to debate anymore because you are incapable of it.

You have turned this politics section and many others across the internet into shit.

why is the left devoid of anything but accusation, ad hominem and hate for dissent?

naturally you think everyone who disagrees is either evil, or controlled by evil, otherwise you would have to consider the opinions of others, and that would require thought.

the left hates thought, preferring emotional outbursts, irrational outrage and gratuitous use of the BlameThrower.

Hey Cheezus? Your thread is the exact analogy of the kettle calling the pot black. You don't possibly think that the master of C&P has original thought do you? Wait, don't answer that, it will require thought.

Perhaps you are part of the far right?

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/stud...-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5#ixzz2is1P1tZH

ChesusRice said:

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/stud...-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5#ixzz2is1P1tZH

Click to expand...

It's NOT a "study", it's an opinion poll, from a leftist polling group, which itself relied on ridiculous assumptions of erroneous "fact" to establish the level at which people were "informed" or "misinformed"


now just wait a few days and trot this old chestnut out again so you can pretend it is valid.


thats why theres no links to the data, only press releases.

ChesusRice said:

They get told what to
-Think
- Be outraged about
- what to believe

Really all you ever do is throw up the latest Rage Command from your tea baggie handlers that are making major bank off your stupidity.
Very rarely do I see a original thought among any of you.
Whenever you get caught passing on the latest crap from the Republican Bullshit mountain. You just deflect to some other equally absurd debunked premise.
You are not even fun to debate anymore because you are incapable of it.

You have turned this politics section and many others across the internet into shit.

Click to expand...

LOL!

Maybe we should copy/paste somebody's blog we agree with (unlinked for source of course), claim it as fact and declare victory.
Or we could just make shit up.

OBAMACARE SAVED MY MOMMA!, REPUBLICANS ARE KEEPING MY G'MA FROM VOTING!!

It's in this environment that the right-wing media thrive, practiced as they are in ginning up stories based on manufactured outrage and utter nonsense. And lately, they've all had one topic on their minds: race. Specifically the racism of black political figures, which they claim is nothing short of institutional policy in the Obama administration, and the racism of white tea partiers, which they claim doesn't exist.

And where else can one begin except with the ever-evolving, increasingly ridiculous New Black Panther Party "scandal," which revolves around the allegation -- and it's hard to believe that right-wingers actually profess to believe this -- that the Obama Justice Department dropped voter intimidation charges against members of this fringe hate group due to the administration's official policy of not pursuing cases in which the defendant is black and the victim is white.

Is there evidence for any of this? No. Does the partisan GOP hack/former DOJ attorney making this allegation have any facts to support it? Not so much. But that's the story they're sticking to, and it has sparked a frenzy of race-baiting more explicit than any we've seen thus far during the Obama administration.


Fox News has, of course, been leading the charge, embarking on what Jonathan Chait calls "the most widespread and mainstream right-wing effort to exploit racial fears against Obama." Glenn Beck nonsensically claimed that the New Black Panthers "have ties to the White House" and flat-out accused the administration of tacitly endorsing the "race war" he sees coming down the pike. Perpetually outraged Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, the "straight news" driving force behind the bogus story, has been corrected on the facts more times than should be necessary, but continues to hype the story with wide-eyed indignation.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/16/media-matters-the-right-wing-rage-machine-unloa/167822

ChesusRice said:

They get told what to
-Think
- Be outraged about
- what to believe

Really all you ever do is throw up the latest Rage Command from your tea baggie handlers that are making major bank off your stupidity.
Very rarely do I see a original thought among any of you.
Whenever you get caught passing on the latest crap from the Republican Bullshit mountain. You just deflect to some other equally absurd debunked premise.
You are not even fun to debate anymore because you are incapable of it.

You have turned this politics section and many others across the internet into shit.

Click to expand...

I've busted you plagiarising whole responses twice in the last week... When challenged you resort to name calling and start spamming threads with unsourced garbage and when we know we've got you on the ropes you add users to your ignore list...

Honestly, it's because of people like you and buck that eugenics became so popular, I can understand why your brand of stupid needs to be eliminated...

Were you a welfare baby growing up?

In Toxic Talk, Bill Press exposed the ways in which the extreme right-wing media has done an end run around the American voting populace by exerting a disproportionate control over open political debate. In The Obama Hate Machine, Press returns to show how the Right has taken rhetoric to slanderous new levels in attacking the nation’s forty-fourth president.

But presidents have always been attacked like this, right? Wrong. As the author shows, while presidents and presidential candidates routinely have been subject to personal attacks, the outright disdain Obama’s extremist opponents have for the facts has inspired an insidious brand of character assassination unique in contemporary politics.

Obama was born in Kenya . . . Obama sympathizes with Muslim terrorists . . . Obama is a communist who wants to institute death panels and touch off class warfare…The extent to which these unfounded assertions have taken hold in the American mindset shows just how ruthless, destructive, and all-powerful the right-wing machine—hijacked by extremists in the media and fueled by corporate coffers—has become. The author reveals how corporate interests such as the infamous Koch Brothers continue to steer political coverage away from fact-based dialogue into the realm of hysteria. Bill Press also observes this phenomenon is not limited to the airwaves and provides an “I Hate Obama Book Club” list, calling out the scores of anti-Obama tomes—and even some from the Left—that have helped drag politics even deeper into the mud.

In his characteristic on-the-mark arguments sure to appeal to anyone on the Left or in the Center, Press shows how the peculiar nature of Obama-hating subverts issue-driven debate and threatens not only the outcome of the 2012 election but the future of the American democratic system.

echelon1k1 said:

I've busted you plagiarising whole responses twice in the last week... When challenged you resort to name calling and start spamming threads with unsourced garbage and when we know we've got you on the ropes you add users to your ignore list...

Honestly, it's because of people like you and buck that eugenics became so popular, I can understand why your brand of stupid needs to be eliminated...

Were you a welfare baby growing up?

Click to expand...

I dont think you know what the word plagiarize means

ChesusRice said:

I dont think you know what the word plagiarize means

Click to expand...

Do you want me to cite the posts?

ChesusRice said:

I dont think you know what the word plagiarize means

Click to expand...

actually i think he has a pretty good handle on the concept

[h=2]pla·gia·rize[/h] verb \ˈplā-jə-ˌrīz also -jē-ə-\ : to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas
~http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarize

while you clearly do not:

ChesusRice said:

In Toxic Talk, Bill Press exposed the ways in which the extreme right-wing media has done an end run around the American voting populace by exerting a disproportionate control over open political debate. In The Obama Hate Machine, Press returns to show how the Right has taken rhetoric to slanderous new levels in attacking the nation’s forty-fourth president.

But presidents have always been attacked like this, right? Wrong. As the author shows, while presidents and presidential candidates routinely have been subject to personal attacks, the outright disdain Obama’s extremist opponents have for the facts has inspired an insidious brand of character assassination unique in contemporary politics.

Obama was born in Kenya . . . Obama sympathizes with Muslim terrorists . . . Obama is a communist who wants to institute death panels and touch off class warfare…The extent to which these unfounded assertions have taken hold in the American mindset shows just how ruthless, destructive, and all-powerful the right-wing machine—hijacked by extremists in the media and fueled by corporate coffers—has become. The author reveals how corporate interests such as the infamous Koch Brothers continue to steer political coverage away from fact-based dialogue into the realm of hysteria. Bill Press also observes this phenomenon is not limited to the airwaves and provides an “I Hate Obama Book Club” list, calling out the scores of anti-Obama tomes—and even some from the Left—that have helped drag politics even deeper into the mud.

In his characteristic on-the-mark arguments sure to appeal to anyone on the Left or in the Center, Press shows how the peculiar nature of Obama-hating subverts issue-driven debate and threatens not only the outcome of the 2012 election but the future of the American democratic system.

Click to expand...

note the lack of ATTRIBUTION, and the complete failure to provide any editorial comment, or statement of personal opinion on the cited Copy/Paste PLAGIARISM.

Dr Kynes said:

actually i think he has a pretty good handle on the concept

pla·gia·rize

verb \ˈplā-jə-ˌrīz also -jē-ə-\ : to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas
~http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarize

while you clearly do not:


note the lack of ATTRIBUTION, and the complete failure to provide any editorial comment, or statement of personal opinion on the cited Copy/Paste PLAGIARISM.

Click to expand...

So you can show that I tried to pretend the words were mine?
A byline or maybe a fucking cover of the book with the Authors name isnt enough?

ChesusRice said:

So you can show that I tried to pretend the words were mine?
A byline or maybe a fucking cover of the book with the Authors name isnt enough?

Click to expand...

but we dont know if this is a weirdly self-referential quote from the book pictured, or a copy/paste from a review of the book in question which is curiously referring to ANOTHER title from the author of the book pictured.

either way you provided no link to the original work, thus denying us Context and Attribution.

you might as well cite your own posts citing your own posts which cite unatributed copy/paste material from another one of you own posts on your blog.

it's not even interesting enough, or pertinent enough to bother trying to track down the ultimate source of this text.

why not simply insert a few unattributed passages from Pig Can Jig, and declare victory.

i suspect youre already preparing your next thread creation as we speak.

Dr Kynes said:

but we dont know if this is a weirdly self-referential quote from the book pictured, or a copy/paste from a review of the book in question which is curiously referring to ANOTHER title from the author of the book pictured.

either way you provided no link to the original work, thus denying us Context and Attribution.

you might as well cite your own posts citing your own posts which cite unatributed copy/paste material from another one of you own posts on your blog.

it's not even interesting enough, or pertinent enough to bother trying to track down the ultimate source of this text.

why not simply insert a few unattributed passages from Pig Can Jig, and declare victory.

i suspect youre already preparing your next thread creation as we speak.

Click to expand...

I guess a picture of the book cover with the title and the Author just isnt good enough for you

come on Cheesus, if somebody was vidictive enough, they could spend 10 minutes and find 100's of your posts that are unsourced copy/pastes. I've been bitching about that since your new incarnation joined. It's in your best interest to not argue that you don't do this... constantly.

OMGZ is cheesus a publishing author now?

UncleBuck said:

OMGZ is cheesus a publishing author now?

Click to expand...

Yeah I'm busted

UncleBuck said:

OMGZ is cheesus a publishing author now?

Click to expand...

Are you willing to go on record saying Cheesus hasn't committed copy-write infringements on this forum? Didn't think so, move along.

ginwilly said:

come on Cheesus, if somebody was vidictive enough, they could spend 10 minutes and find 100's of your posts that are unsourced copy/pastes. I've been bitching about that since your new incarnation joined. It's in your best interest to not argue that you don't do this... constantly.

Click to expand...

Ok you have 10 minutes

Find a dozen
Or shut the fuck up