Go with the Han's and you won't regret it .Well TY.. I really like the bonsai look that option A produced. Where I do allot of breeding & run plants a tad faster then usual that would work out perfect for me.you can describe the (Santa 's coming on a jet-ski !!
Do you want me to describe the bikini / minikini wearing 8'5" 'elves' ? ) if you'd like still
This one ? :I like the LED system I have now allot. It is a Budzilla. Although I have had some issues out of it in the past (ballast went out) I would have to say its out did itself. The Co went out of business. I had received it brand new free of charge for doing a side by side study of LED VS HPS systems a few years back.
He is referring to some cheaper led panels using uncertified drivers that may produce EMI. Decent led drivers (does not have to be expensive - the 50w fasttech drivers are around $10 and is emi protected) will prevent EMI from being emitted. This is a big deal because EMI can interfere with power infrastructure, can affect airlines and can also ruin TV/radio reception for those around you. SDS mentioned in another thread that someone he knew was busted because the EMI was messing with peoples TV reception and they traced it back to the grow. In places like the USA you could also be violating laws regarding broadcasting by the FCC if I am not mistaken. I am not from the US so take the FCC part with a grain of salt. Basically EMI broadcasts (for miles around potentially) the fact that you are growing, and if a telco or power company is being negatively effected then they will have no problem locating it and passing the info to the fuzz.
Hold on
Speaking of passive components....thoughts on these SDS? (for existing systems)Exactly ...In fact EMI protection does not increase the production cost/retail price much..
(Few passive components needed only ...)
Bravo !
Cheers
..But quite often you can find ,plenty of EMI unfiltered/ unprotected CC led drivers ...
Ussually the very cheap ,'no-name' ones ...Not all of them....But plenty enough ...
Worst case scenario is a "floating-ground" EMI unprotected CC led driver ....
A powerful 'ripple noise ' transmitter ...
A 'beacon' ,right in the middle of your grow !
...A 'siren' calling ...other ....'sirens' ...
Shit ..Not good ..
For a lot of 10pcs ,price is very good .
Thanks...i wont be getting any now...^^^^ I have those and use them btw
ahh i see. Im very curious in the canopy pentration. I have 7 feet to work withminus a foot almost for filter. I know the CLW puts out decent ass umoles (1389) at 18 in and 2570 at 12 in. except they might burn at 12 in lol especially the 440 compared to old one. I am getting popcorn buds though do to lack of penetration. This is why im interested in other lights. Still gonna finish grow with 440 and see how well the 5 or 6 band spectrum works compared to less spectrum with lenses. How many bands is the area51RW? anybody know?
I also wanna put these uvb's to the test. Which brings me to another thing, if i go area51 or apache, i would love to still supplement uvb light.
As for the apaches, don't they have to be farther away because of the small lenses?
i know you love your A51
Im also curious how loud the at200 is. i calculated it out and if i got 2 at200's and an rw75 id be a lil over 2200 out. If i just got 7 or 8 RW 75 id be out 2000 exact. quite a difference. and hell of an investment either way! coverage would be diff for sure.
edit: plus uvb lights! smh.
Isn't that the brand of light that was ripping off its customers and being a horrible product/company in general?
