it is not involuntary because you can leave anytime you want. if you choose to stay, then they are voluntary. if you were forced to stay, then they would be involuntary.Not trying to steal your thread, but isn't the discussion of "how much" people should be involuntarily taxed failing to address the real issue?
That's a stretch...............it is not involuntary because you can leave anytime you want. if you choose to stay, then they are voluntary. if you were forced to stay, then they would be involuntary.
Yeah good point. Unfortunately when you grow up really poor you are more likely to get pregnant and make poor decisions. Probably for every 1 person that grows up poor and becomes a productive member of society, there are 5 that were the unfortunate ones that live on government cheese and never made it out of the hole. Sounds like they may extend the tax cuts for everyone. But I doubt that will stimulate the economy that much, since those tax break are currently in effect.I personally believe there should be a new tax bracket for $850,000 and above. I think everyone should have to pay something, When you factor in the resources the bottom 2 brackets use in gov "benefits/social welfare programs" they receive far more than what they pay in. Not saying that's right or wrong but I hate when people say the rich receive the biggest tax cuts.....duh
Well said. +reptaxes have to go up. everybody agrees, the rich are more able to absorb tax-increases at this particular point in time.
about the only drawback to being rich right now. your taxes have to go up. but don't worry, you'll still be able to go to the lake house this thanksgiving, and to the beach house next summer........
Cut? No. Their taxes should be raised, a lot.Who thinks that the top 2-3% income earners should get tax cuts?
Of course it won't. If republicans really wanted to create jobs by giving tax cuts to "job creators", they would be taxing about cutting the corporate tax rate, not the personal income taxes of rich people.Who thinks that if they get the tax cut it will go to creating jobs?
The best way to stimulate the economy is to put it in the hands of those who are more likely to spend it.Who thinks that if they get the tax cut that it doesn't go to creating jobs?
They'll be ok. The rich haven't prospered this much since the great depression.taxes have to go up. everybody agrees, the rich are more able to absorb tax-increases at this particular point in time.
about the only drawback to being rich right now. your taxes have to go up. but don't worry, you'll still be able to go to the lake house this thanksgiving, and to the beach house next summer........
Wow, during the depression income tax rate was at like 70-90%, so did all the rich leave the states to go find better tax breaks? So to say we are killing the goose is a bit of an overstatement. I mean come on there taxes would go up a whole whapping 3-4%.We are slowly killing the Goose that lays the golden eggs here in america with taxes.
The rich will pack up an go somewhere with a better tax system. Taking there money an jobs with em.
Most of small buessness men with are taxed at the same rate billl gates pays, why not retire when the gov gets to greedy?
Why do we penalize the most prospherus hard working wealthy people so strongly.
I will never start a small buisness cause of govt red tape an taxes. Im glad steve jobs didnt feel this way when he started apple, or we wouldnt be usin Personal Computers.Would You socalist would be happer if we jailed Bill Gates an stole his fortune?
Was it Robin Hood or Stalin who "robbed from the rich to give to the poor"
By penalized do you mean raising the taxes 3%?Why do we penalize the most prospherus hard working wealthy people so strongly.
So by raising the income tax 3% that is sending a message to Bill gates we want to jail him and take his fortune? laughable.Would You socalist would be happer if we jailed Bill Gates an stole his fortune?