ttystikk
Well-Known Member
https://medium.com/@tuckerfitzgerald/intolerant-liberals-4ecd712ac939
A critique of relativist thinking- and who's really using it.
A critique of relativist thinking- and who's really using it.
Those Damned Intolerant Liberals
- Thread starter ttystikk
- Start date
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” ― Isaac Asimov
The progressive liberal agenda isn’t about being nice. It’s about confronting evil, violence, trauma, and death. It’s about acknowledging the ways systemic power, systemic oppression, systemic evil, work in our world around us. I’m not fighting for diversity. I’m not fighting for tolerance. I’m fighting to overturn horrific systems of dehumanizing oppression.
Here’s a great example of a liberal relationship to diversity: when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was asked how many women on the Supreme Court would be enough, she answered “When there are nine.” In response to the collective gasp of every conservative on earth, she elaborated. “For most of the country’s history, there were nine and they were all men. Nobody thought that was strange.”
Personally I’m not interested in a female president for the sake of “diversity.” Putting a woman in the white house in 2020 won’t mean that gender equality has arrived. We’ve had 45 presidents. It’s going to take 45 women serving as president before we even have a chance to reach parity.
Do you get it now?
The progressive liberal agenda isn’t about being nice. It’s about confronting evil, violence, trauma, and death. It’s about acknowledging the ways systemic power, systemic oppression, systemic evil, work in our world around us. I’m not fighting for diversity. I’m not fighting for tolerance. I’m fighting to overturn horrific systems of dehumanizing oppression.
Here’s a great example of a liberal relationship to diversity: when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was asked how many women on the Supreme Court would be enough, she answered “When there are nine.” In response to the collective gasp of every conservative on earth, she elaborated. “For most of the country’s history, there were nine and they were all men. Nobody thought that was strange.”
Personally I’m not interested in a female president for the sake of “diversity.” Putting a woman in the white house in 2020 won’t mean that gender equality has arrived. We’ve had 45 presidents. It’s going to take 45 women serving as president before we even have a chance to reach parity.
Do you get it now?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
You are a walking contradiction“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” ― Isaac Asimov
The progressive liberal agenda isn’t about being nice. It’s about confronting evil, violence, trauma, and death. It’s about acknowledging the ways systemic power, systemic oppression, systemic evil, work in our world around us. I’m not fighting for diversity. I’m not fighting for tolerance. I’m fighting to overturn horrific systems of dehumanizing oppression.
Here’s a great example of a liberal relationship to diversity: when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was asked how many women on the Supreme Court would be enough, she answered “When there are nine.” In response to the collective gasp of every conservative on earth, she elaborated. “For most of the country’s history, there were nine and they were all men. Nobody thought that was strange.”
Personally I’m not interested in a female president for the sake of “diversity.” Putting a woman in the white house in 2020 won’t mean that gender equality has arrived. We’ve had 45 presidents. It’s going to take 45 women serving as president before we even have a chance to reach parity.
Do you get it now?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Why do you always feel the need to defend @schuylaar?
Makes you look desperate and foolish.
Tell you what explain to me how her last post is not a contradiction.
Sky quotes Ruth Bader Ginsburg saying we don't have enough women on the Supreme Court, then SKY turns around and says she is not for having a women in office for diversity.
Which the fuck is it.
Sky is a woman who hates other women
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i thought you hated name calling
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i get it, it's not your fault. it never is
you complain about name calling and then go on to name call. but that's my fault.
it is not your fault
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
He hates it when people call him names. He has homework and moral high ground so it's ok when he does it.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
As usual, shit talking and can't even comment on the thread topic.
You're mind pollution.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Waaaaaaaaah
If mocking others is all you can manage then don't expect anyone to take you seriously.
More mind pollution.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Civility please.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Tty, once again you are projecting. We don't take you seriously because you are a joke - a bad joke.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
Correct. You’re agenda ruins every thread. Was that so hard?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
He's toxic schlock. So full of hatred that he doesn't see the damage he does to his own cause.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You missed the part where liberals also oppose racism. Not surprised.“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” ― Isaac Asimov
The progressive liberal agenda isn’t about being nice. It’s about confronting evil, violence, trauma, and death. It’s about acknowledging the ways systemic power, systemic oppression, systemic evil, work in our world around us. I’m not fighting for diversity. I’m not fighting for tolerance. I’m fighting to overturn horrific systems of dehumanizing oppression.
Here’s a great example of a liberal relationship to diversity: when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was asked how many women on the Supreme Court would be enough, she answered “When there are nine.” In response to the collective gasp of every conservative on earth, she elaborated. “For most of the country’s history, there were nine and they were all men. Nobody thought that was strange.”
Personally I’m not interested in a female president for the sake of “diversity.” Putting a woman in the white house in 2020 won’t mean that gender equality has arrived. We’ve had 45 presidents. It’s going to take 45 women serving as president before we even have a chance to reach parity.
Do you get it now?
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
He is basically a hysterical extreme left website announcer.
Might as well be hysterical far right as far as needed voters are concerned.