This is how your free speech will end. "It could never happen here"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
not saying rob roy is a fucking pedophile, just pointing out that everyone here seriously believes rob roy is a pedophile for some reason

i hope President Elect Joseph R. Biden III bans his shitty, stupid neo nazi hate speech just like they did in france and germany with zero problems whatsoever.


1606318372601.png
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Where is free speech bring suppressed @Rob Roy
The first paragraph below was found online, the second and third are from an article I read earlier today, it's an excerpt from a Mises Institute article written by Jeff Deist. Albeit the latter paragraphs require some extrapolative thinking where the first is a more direct response to your query.


Article 88 of the UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 888, makes it a crime for a commissioned military officer to use contemptuous words against the President and Congress, among others. The Department of Defense has also expanded this rule to include all military enlisted personnel (DOD Directive 1344.10). During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, two enlisted members of the military were formally reprimanded for using e-mails to mock President Clinton. Presidents Lincoln, Truman, Carter, Bush, and Obama have all decided to reprimand or remove high ranking officers for public comments that undermine or disobey presidential policy.



“Big Digital,” as Professor Michael Rectenwald terms tech companies, have become “governmentalities”: supposedly private enterprises turned into instruments of state power and state narratives. This sordid process is different for each company, (some are more complicit than others, a few are heroically non-compliant) but it involves a mix of early start-up funding; connections and contracts with state agencies, particularly relating to defense and surveillance; and propaganda campaigns in service of state narratives. Rectenwald explains this phenomenon in his own recent talk titled “The Google Election“:

In short, Google, Facebook and others are not strictly private sector entities; they are governmentalities in the sense that I have given to the term. They are extensions and apparatuses of the state. Furthermore, these platforms are governmentalities with a particular interest in the growth and extension of governmentality itself. This includes championing every kind of “subordinated” and newly created identity class that they can find or create, because such “endangered” categories require state acknowledgement and protection. Thus, the state’s circumference continues to expand. Big Digital is partial to the interests and growth of the state. It not only does business with statists but also shares their values. This helps makes sense of its leftist bent and their preference for the deep state Democrats. Leftism is statism.
 

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
The first paragraph below was found online, the second and third are from an article I read earlier today, it's an excerpt from a Mises Institute article written by Jeff Deist. Albeit the latter paragraphs require some extrapolative thinking where the first is a more direct response to your query.


Article 88 of the UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 888, makes it a crime for a commissioned military officer to use contemptuous words against the President and Congress, among others. The Department of Defense has also expanded this rule to include all military enlisted personnel (DOD Directive 1344.10). During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, two enlisted members of the military were formally reprimanded for using e-mails to mock President Clinton. Presidents Lincoln, Truman, Carter, Bush, and Obama have all decided to reprimand or remove high ranking officers for public comments that undermine or disobey presidential policy.



“Big Digital,” as Professor Michael Rectenwald terms tech companies, have become “governmentalities”: supposedly private enterprises turned into instruments of state power and state narratives. This sordid process is different for each company, (some are more complicit than others, a few are heroically non-compliant) but it involves a mix of early start-up funding; connections and contracts with state agencies, particularly relating to defense and surveillance; and propaganda campaigns in service of state narratives. Rectenwald explains this phenomenon in his own recent talk titled “The Google Election“:
@Rob Roy

let’s hear in your words. Anyone can cut and paste Rob
 

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
good call on the Rams plus the points. Your advice on the Dolphins/Broncos game was horrible. at least i broke even.
I won $8. Go Broncos. I didn't think really think they'd win, but my wife doesn't let me bet against them, not even for them to lose but cover the spread, lol. I'm playing with free money I got from BetMGM anyways since it just became legal here so we're getting tons of offers.

I told someone about it on here and they're up like $800 now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top