The next 2 years of Republican Control and Their Message

I'm sober right now. Do you know how Uncle Buck, and about 4-5 others argue on a regular basis. That is what we have developing right now.

You see the need to preach at the pot smokers and I see a need to give you shit for it.

I don't know if I would like you in real life but if you were hungry i would give you my last 5 dollars for you to eat.


Thanks, but I'd need at least 10.
 
What if you were hungry too?

I would still give it to her, you , whoever.

I can take care of my self.

I have had the unique chance to live in the woods and the ghetto.
Drop me in the middle of the woods or the city. I'll eat and eat well.

What I mean is do more for others.
I swear with my word as a man, if you do more for others, you will never worry about things.
 
I would still give it to her, you , whoever.

I can take care of my self.

I have had the unique chance to live in the woods and the ghetto.
Drop me in the middle of the woods or the city. I'll eat and eat well.

What I mean is do more for others.
I swear with my word as a man, if you do more for others, you will never worry about things.


So you feel I can't take care of myself? Is it because I'm a woman? Do you hate women?
 
If I divorce my wife but am still paying the bills she initiated, that I am obligated to pay.
Even though I cut my expenses in half.

Am I still blamed for my increasing debt?

Obama has cut the deficit.
We are still obligated to pay the bills we initiated before january of 2009
 
If I divorce my wife but am still paying the bills she initiated, that I am obligated to pay.
Even though I cut my expenses in half.

Am I still blamed for my increasing debt?

Obama has cut the deficit.
We are still obligated to pay the bills we initiated before january of 2009

Are you claiming that he decreased spending then? Or in your weird way are you claiming the spending is the same as it was because the bills are the same? (they are not, jic you didn't know).

So for your statement to be true, spending could not have increased. Are you willing to stand by that?

It's pretty simple, look at how much each president added to the debt, Bush WAS the worst ever, Obama is adding more debt than Bush.
 
Are you claiming that he decreased spending then?

obama has decreased the deficit more than any other president in history.

that continues the trend wherein democrats reduce deficits, and your beloved republicans explode deficits to all time record levels.

if you want fiscally responsible, vote democrat.

if you want nanny state collectivist bigot, vote for rawn pawl.
 
Are you claiming that he decreased spending then? Or in your weird way are you claiming the spending is the same as it was because the bills are the same? (they are not, jic you didn't know).

So for your statement to be true, spending could not have increased. Are you willing to stand by that?

It's pretty simple, look at how much each president added to the debt, Bush WAS the worst ever, Obama is adding more debt than Bush.
140123150440-percentage-of-gdp-620xa.png
 
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
It's unlikely that President Obama will ever shake his reputation among Republicans as a big spender. But a key fact counters that rap.
As a share of the economy, spending on domestic and defense programs has been on the decline since 2010, and is on track to reach the lowest level in more than 50 years by 2023.
At its height in 2010, "discretionary spending" under Obama reached 9.1% of GDP. That was largely due to the stimulus law intended to dig the country out of a deep recession. But even at that high level, it wasn't that much higher than the 40-year average of 8.4% and was still below the 40-year peak of 10% reached in 1983.
Today, levels are well below the long-term average. And the Congressional Budget Office projects that by 2023 discretionary spending will fall to 5.3% of GDP, the lowest since 1962.
 
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
It's unlikely that President Obama will ever shake his reputation among Republicans as a big spender. But a key fact counters that rap.
As a share of the economy, spending on domestic and defense programs has been on the decline since 2010, and is on track to reach the lowest level in more than 50 years by 2023.
At its height in 2010, "discretionary spending" under Obama reached 9.1% of GDP. That was largely due to the stimulus law intended to dig the country out of a deep recession. But even at that high level, it wasn't that much higher than the 40-year average of 8.4% and was still below the 40-year peak of 10% reached in 1983.
Today, levels are well below the long-term average. And the Congressional Budget Office projects that by 2023 discretionary spending will fall to 5.3% of GDP, the lowest since 1962.

Again, is this Chesus proof that Obama is spending less?
 
Back
Top