Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Can you think of a valid situation where the ends justify the means?
When a guard tells the house that a new inmate molested a child, and the inmates beat him to death with shower shoes!![]()
Exactly! One man condems another to death by way of inmate! Was it right for one man to expose another, subsequently ending his life , While bringing justice to the victim?I take the question to mean doing a wrong to produce a right , Sure it could be interpeted as legal / illegal , but in psychology sense it's all about whats ultimately right not legal.
That being said the only time I could justify doing wrong would be to change a major portion of societys rule/law . to bring about a more free life , hopefully free of a tyrant
Like obama (and recent former presidents) is illegaly ruleing by executive orders , Issueing another executive order to repeal those illegal ones is illegal and even wrong on some level , but may be nessay
OK, so sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.
So what distinguishes between the two? What is the defining factor in deciding if they do or not?