should we just let celebrities run the world?

420Jedi

Member
Oh hell no.. we would all be drinking typhoid infected water in no time.

They only reason their are celebrities... its cause we love to watch them crash and burn!
 

Purplekrunchie

Well-Known Member
If we only have 30,000 people per Representative then a Representative will find running commercials inefficient in both time and money. They would have to start meeting with their constitutients again, face to face, and talking to the public instead of dictating to them.

Instead of not knowing our representatives as people, we would know them as people, they would be once again our neighbors, chosen because they share the beliefs of people in a neighborhood. It would deliver more representation to the lower and middle classes.
Or as ive always said, at least take the big money out of it, so there is equal footing.


The American political class is made up of elites that went to the "proper" schools, belong to the "right" families and backed by the state media, also known as the Main Stream Media. When a candidate of the people comes along, someone like Ron Paul or Sarah Palin, they are simply ignored, or attacked and belittled. The average American does what she/he is told to do by the media.

Vi
You aint shitting there, I just saw a republican rating for 2012 and Ron Paul wasn't even listed. Who is being asked? Not me for sure, what, he is considered a radical because he actually tries to expose these turds. I would like a Paul / Palin ticket, but I don't think Palin did herself a big favor by stepping down to pursue other goals.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Or as ive always said, at least take the big money out of it, so there is equal footing.




You aint shitting there, I just saw a republican rating for 2012 and Ron Paul wasn't even listed. Who is being asked? Not me for sure, what, he is considered a radical because he actually tries to expose these turds. I would like a Paul / Palin ticket, but I don't think Palin did herself a big favor by stepping down to pursue other goals.
Well, this remains to be seen. All the feedback we're getting on Palin's resignation as governor is coming from the talking heads of that very same state media I spoke of. Palin has a very solid backing from the conservative/libertarian base. Quite honestly, I don't think she'll let it go to waste. The woman has a lot to offer the freedom movement ... as does Ron Paul of course.

Vi
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Well, this remains to be seen. All the feedback we're getting on Palin's resignation as governor is coming from the talking heads of that very same state media I spoke of. Palin has a very solid backing from the conservative/libertarian base. Quite honestly, I don't think she'll let it go to waste. The woman has a lot to offer the freedom movement ... as does Ron Paul of course.

Vi

Dude, Palin is a moron, what the hell do you guys see in her, honestly?
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Or as ive always said, at least take the big money out of it, so there is equal footing.





You aint shitting there, I just saw a republican rating for 2012 and Ron Paul wasn't even listed. Who is being asked? Not me for sure, what, he is considered a radical because he actually tries to expose these turds. I would like a Paul / Palin ticket, but I don't think Palin did herself a big favor by stepping down to pursue other goals.

Violation of the 1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech, but increasing the size of the House would drastically reduce the cost of the campaign. It is possible to meet 30,000 people, or at least a good chunk of them during a campaign, it is not possible to meet 700,000+ while campaigning except through television or radio.


As far as the absence of Ron Paul, the media probably fears him (he would deprive their friends, the banksters, of their monopoly.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Dude, Palin is a moron, what the hell do you guys see in her, honestly?
I see a strong woman who is married to a man's man. I see a woman who has moved the feminist movement well beyond what the liberals have done, and in fact, exposed the National Organization for Women, and Democrats in general, for the hypocrites they are. I see a professional woman who has come from outside the main stream, elitist political circles, to scare the crappola out of the status quo.

Look, the fact that you, and many others like you, have bought into the heavily edited interviews done with Palin by the Main Stream Media wonks like Katie Curic and Charlie (look over the glasses in a condescending way) Gibson, doesn't make Palin "stupid," or a "moron." Is there really any doubt that the best parts of the interviews, those parts that showed Plain's true self, were left on the floor of the cutting room? The facts are, the woman is bright, articulate, energetic, bold ... and speaks to the hearts of small-town folks all across the country. Sarah and Todd Palin ARE Main Stream America.

Why do you think she is such a target of the political elites and their lackeys like Dave Letterman and Keith Olbermann? The reason is, she is a breath of fresh air. She is an outside the beltway force to be reckoned with ... and they know it.

Take this to the bank: You haven't heard the last from Palin ... not by a long shot.

So, hopefully P, this answers your question of what we see in the "moron" Palin. :lol:

Vi
 
Top