well hell's bells man...that's a mighty fine forest you have for yourself there.
seems you don't need to know about any ol stinky ppm gibberish to me..
very nice indeed.
not at all, no...just keep an eye on the tall lanky one and your gold i bet.
no reason not to know to use and have a test kit around though...for insurance and all
no...i am always suspicious of tall plants...the males need to be the tallest so gravity does it's thing with their pollen.
just paranoia really...
thanks for the link very complicated to understand i may be to stoned to get it. in gen did it say that ppm and ec were basically measured the same? so if i get a ppm meter will that suffice or no?
im assuming that i am probably one of the only ppl not paying attention to their ppm or ec and no one can answer my question? really?
fer sure its wasn't to confusing im just not sure if i was correct in assuming that ec was just basically a different way to measure ppm. if it is then wouldn't you only need a ppm meter and not both ppm and ec? heres the link to that thread https://www.rollitup.org/newbie-central/953-talk-about-ec.html#post4801
For convenience, EC measurements often are converted to TDS units (ppm) by the meter.
The meter cannot directly measure TDS as described above, and instead uses a linear conversion factor to calculate it. Everyones nutrient mix is different, so no factor will be exact. The meter uses an approximate conversion factor, because the exact composition of the mix is not known. Conversion factors range from .50 to .72, *depending on the meter manufacturer, which do a good job of approximating a TDS calculation from the meters measurement of EC.
* All ppm pens actually measure the value based on EC and then convert the EC value to display the ppm value, having different conversion factors between differing manufacturers is why we have this problem communicating nutrient measurments between one another.