Pirates of the Mediterranean!

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Lots of swashbuckling action! Watch the bad guys lose lose while they flout every regulation governing shipping on the high seas! Paratroopers rappelling onto the decks! Arresting- and later, attempting to bribe ship captains! High drama of retaliation in the Persian Gulf!

https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/09/13/the-pirates-of-gibraltar/

Refill your popcorn kids, this one's not over yet!
Is it hard pretending that people take you seriously, or is it just second nature?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CounterPunch
When Alexander Cockburn died in 2012 at the age of 71, environmental journalist Joshua Frank became managing editor and Jeffrey St. Clair became editor-in-chief of CounterPunch.

Former CounterPunch contributor Israel Shamir was part of the WikiLeaks organisation and an associate of its director, Julian Assange, and in late 2010 and early 2011 wrote a series of articles for CounterPunch drawing on materials from the United States diplomatic cables leak. He has also written and co-written articles for CounterPunch on what he alleges to be a campaign of harassment against Assange. One of these articles, "Assange Betrayed", made allegations against a plaintiff in a Swedish rape case against Assange that were widely circulated in the media. The allegations in CounterPunch were the topic of controversy in the mainstream media.

Russian disinformation[edit]
During the 2016 presidential election, CounterPunch published the writings of Alice Donovan who purported to be a freelance writer but was in fact a pseudonymous employee of the Russian government. Donovan was tracked by the FBI for nine months. According to The Washington Post, "she seemed to be doing the Kremlin’s bidding by stoking discontent toward Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and touting WikiLeaks, which U.S. officials say was a tool of Russia’s broad influence operation to affect the presidential race." In late November 2017, The Washington Post contacted CounterPunch about Donovan; co-editor Jeffrey St. Clair said that Donovan's pitches did not stand out amongst the pitches that CounterPunch received daily. St. Clair asked Donovan to substantiate her identity by sending a photo of her driving license but Donovan never responded. On the same day The Washington Post article was published on Donovan, St. Clair and Frank published a piece stating that CounterPunch only ran one article by Alice Donovan during the 2016 election, which was on cyber-breaches of medical databases. Donovan was also exposed by the newsletter as a serial plagiarizer. In another follow-up article St. Clair and Frank exposed a network of alleged trolls that operated a site called Inside Syria Media Center promoting a pro-Bashar al-Assad and pro-Russian view of the Syrian Civil War. St. Clair and Frank speculated that the website was connected to the same network of trolls as Alice Donovan.
The Russians were busy buying up any and all junk online news sites so that they could link to each other and pump out enough junk to fill every newsfeed for people based on whatever message the Cambridge Analytica program figured they would fall for.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
yet more propaganda delivered to us by the fact free faction of the Democratic Party.

Give it up, tty, that crap only works on your kind and white boomers watching Fox News at the assisted living facility.
Find one factually incorrect statement in the article. You can't. That's why you're the one with no credibility.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Find one factually incorrect statement in the article. You can't. That's why you're the one with no credibility.
counterpunch is a propaganda website that supports the right wing agenda. Anything coming from that site is suspect.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
@Fogdog is a propaganda conspiracy theorist that supports the right wing agenda. Anythingcoming from that user is suspect
No date tonight, tty? Its Friday night and you aint got nobody.

All you can do is get fucked up and repeat what others said.

If you would just make a start by accepting you've lied and hurt others, then apologize, maybe people wouldn't shun you.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
No date tonight, tty? Its Friday night and you aint got nobody.

All you can do is get fucked up and repeat what others said.

If you would just make a start by accepting you've lied and hurt others, then apologize, maybe people wouldn't shun you.
Another personal attack because you can't have an honest conversation about issues.

@Fogdog is a propaganda conspiracy theorist who supports the right wing agenda. Anything coming from that user is suspect.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
The website you linked is a Russian propaganda website. It might be a 'liberal' slant, but it is all the same garbage as their right wing sites. A good amount of selective truth with selective lies sprinkled in to it to push their agenda.
Funny how you attack the source instead of the content.

That's because you can't attack the content because it's documenting the facts in the ground- or in this case, on the high seas.

Clearly you have a problem being able to tell the difference between truth and fallacy and lack critical thinking skills.

That's your problem, not mine- and certainly not the fault of the author of the article.

Now grow up. Stop emulating the Buckwit brigade here. They aren't role models of anything except how to tell the whole world how snowed they are by their own misconceptions.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Funny how you attack the source instead of the content.

That's because you can't attack the content because it's documenting the facts in the ground- or in this case, on the high seas.

Clearly you have a problem being able to tell the difference between truth and fallacy and lack critical thinking skills.

That's your problem, not mine- and certainly not the fault of the author of the article.

Now grow up. Stop emulating the Buckwit brigade here. They aren't role models of anything except how to tell the whole world how snowed they are by their own misconceptions.
Like I said, a large portion of what those bullshit propaganda websites will post legitimate information about stories others have written than support their particular websites narrative. The portion that they slip into their 'news' that is lies is enough that anything they do lacks all credibility.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Like I said, a large portion of what those bullshit propaganda websites will post legitimate information about stories others have written than support their particular websites narrative. The portion that they slip into their 'news' that is lies is enough that anything they do lacks all credibility.
Does this have anything at all to do with the British act of piracy against a vessel engaged in lawful commerce, goaded on by the United States, a rogue outlaw state that does not respect international law, does not abide by its own treaties and murders innocent civilians around the world by the millions for profit?

I thought not.
 
Top