Peter Strzok used nasty words to describe Donald Trump ...are there any nice ones ?

Lock him up? maybe?

 

So he's not a fan of Comb-over Caligula lol.

 

He sat on info which would have cost trump the election

 

It's to keep us distracted so we don't question events like Sandy Hook, Columbine MSF High... etc,

If you ever doubted whether it was a psyop. Notice it's on a new video channel which was started because of YT censorship. This is but one example of governments gun agenda, but ther are many in different categories exposing the lies and real intent of government) things that prove conclusively that our government (both parties) collectively want to control the crap out of us and will resort to this as well as real events oh and don't forget banksters wars, which keep them all in biness

https://www.real.video/5807994769001

 

You need therapy

 

Now Columbine is a conspiracy?

Lol

So much for anyone ever taking you seriously again!

 

Everyone has used rude words to describe TrumpDump... even Republican.

 

Trump is a n word

 

I think Strzok comes across as honest. He can't see his own bias, but a good guy, patriot. Trump is just a clever con man with the great fortune of running against Hillary. Todays hearing was good for Strzok, just way too long, even with some entertaining hyperbole from both sides.

 

Crawl back in your nazi hole fat boi

 

Still not at peace with yourself? You have my sympathy.

 

he admitted he doesn't really care for Trump. But where he really grabbed Republicans by the balls and really shut their whole act down was with his actions.

Even Gowdy when he tried to have his AHA! moment got shot down by the same IG report he kept trying to reference (which said that the agents showed too much bias in their communications) said that the handling of matters, their ACTIONS, were reasonable.... and when Republicans tried to put words in his mouth or flip what he was saying into something he was not Democrats really came together to rally against what was obvious political pandering....

And when the Chair tried to threaten him with Contempt because he couldn't answer a question - Democrats were amazing in their responses: Can we also consider charging Steve Bannon with contempt for refusing to answer questions without any legal basis?

And they filed a motion which was received without objection to bring Bannon back to the hot seat - that to me was the climax of the whole deal.....

 

Yeah, I agree, win for Strzok, loss for repubs.

 

Aren’t you the fucking retard who bragged that North Korea was gonna denuke?

You have zero credibility

 

I don't think so, just giving my opinion on the hearing today. Is that ok?

 

No because what you try to call your opinion is usually just lies, apologism for racists, lame excuses, propaganda and so forth

 

I would liked to have heard Mr. Cox (fox?) finish his statement before Cnn cut to Trump arriving to dinner in England.

My overall thought on the body language is that Mr. Gowdy may be the next to get served papers.

I can see half time adds coming to this new Brawndo format.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=23&v=uxoiOJ280LI

 

Lol, discussion forums, whatcha gonna do?

 

keep pointing out that you celebrated trump's illegitimate election alongside avowed white supremacists while you try to play mrs. innocent

 

Have fun!