RetiredGuerilla
Well-Known Member
Our realm is of intelligent design. The Mayan were the masters of time because they mastered the dome.
Most straight people cringe at the sight of two men kissing
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
What if they're good looking guys?
Just watch and fap one out, sexuality is a spectrum. Loosen up and take a dick in the ass every once in a while.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
i don't want to see anyone making out, get a fucking room. don't care if its two men, two women, one of each, or if they have the sheep of their choice with them.....do whatever turns your crank, i just don't want to watch it.
Farmer.J
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
The issue isn't what Reid said when she was homophobic ~2010, it's that she lied about it to try to save face. She was recently outed as her blog was cited and she previously apologized for it. She was outed again for much harsher words towards LGBTQ, this time she feigned ignorance, claiming "hackers" must have made those posts. Even though she had hired "Cyber Security Experts" to get to the bottom of it. They found no evidence of any hacking. Though Reid still claims she "doesn't believe" she made those posts, there is no evidence that proves it, and her cyber security experts can't figure it out, either..
Everyone says something they regret later at some point in time. Should we hold Reid accountable for what she said? Absolutely. But since then, she's shown significant change in opinion when it comes to LGBTQ rights. That's something I would commend her for. That's courageous. It would be brave of her to simply own up to what she said back then and move on like she did before. Advancing this obvious lie is what tarnishes her credibility. The evidence shows she made those posts, too. Accept it, apologize for it (which she already essentially did, even though she claims she didn't make the posts..?) and move on. That's how you get past it.
But that's not what she chose to do. That's painful for activists and LGBTQ people to see and hear.
Everyone says something they regret later at some point in time. Should we hold Reid accountable for what she said? Absolutely. But since then, she's shown significant change in opinion when it comes to LGBTQ rights. That's something I would commend her for. That's courageous. It would be brave of her to simply own up to what she said back then and move on like she did before. Advancing this obvious lie is what tarnishes her credibility. The evidence shows she made those posts, too. Accept it, apologize for it (which she already essentially did, even though she claims she didn't make the posts..?) and move on. That's how you get past it.
But that's not what she chose to do. That's painful for activists and LGBTQ people to see and hear.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I think you should be held accountable for calling people on this board faxxxts. Your concern for LGBTQ is more like crocodile tears.
I think we'll have to let those who are close to the information find out what really happened with Reid.
You are convinced, that's pretty clear but then again you have a history of forming conviction based upon belief without real evidence.
What was said in Snopes: 25 April 2018
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2018/04/25/msnbcs-joy-reid-says-homophobic-posts-result-hack/
MSNBC's Joy Reid insists that homophobic language in one of her old blog posts is the work of a computer hacker and her security expert said they have a strong suspicion of who did it.
MSNBC says the case has been referred to law enforcement officials and the network is awaiting their determination.
The investigation isn't finished. I think I'll wait until the network receives law enforcement official's determinations. Also, the network, it's advertisers and the LGBTQ community should weigh in on this.
What we do know is that you've been pretty well proven to use homophobic slurs with intent to insult people on this forum. I guess you don't hold yourself to the same standard you hold for somebody else even before it's really certain what happened.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
The "cyber security experts" Reid herself hired found no evidence of "hackers"
You will wait until an investigation is finished to decide a judgment for Joy Reid, yet you're ready and willing to condemn Bernie Sanders for an ongoing investigation into Jane Sanders...
The reactionary right are gearing up to do to Sanders what they did to Clinton
Can you explain why you believe Reid deserves a fair chance at due process while you condemn Sanders automatically?
... they have, and it doesn't look good for Reid.. Yet MSNBC is sticking by her. I wonder why... Sam Seder got fired from MSNBC for making an obvious joke about rape while Reid can lie about her legitimate discrimination against LGBTQ and still keep her job.. Seder being an actual progressive, Reid being an establishment shill. No disconnect there.. Shows us where the true agenda lies.
Had Trump said the same thing Reid said, even if it was 10 years ago, the Democratic establishment would have tried to impeach him for it. Yet Reid get's a pass. This is one example of the countless that people have cited as to why they don't trust mainstream media sources. This type of stuff just further advances that narrative.
Last edited:
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
I generally dislike public displays of affection and crying children
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
MSNBC's Joy Reid insists that homophobic language in one of her old blog posts is the work of a computer hacker and her security expert said they have a strong suspicion of who did it.
MSNBC says the case has been referred to law enforcement officials and the network is awaiting their determination.
I never said that. I said the article I posted was clearly propaganda and therefore suspect. I said that the reactionary right was going to use all it could dig up on Bernie and make up even more if Bernie becomes a front runner. I predicted you and other Cult of Sanders would cry like babies when they do, implying you are soft. You are proving me right.
You are proven to be easily deluded by false beliefs and I don't really give a shit what you wonder. What you think has no value at all. MSNBC will have to explain why. It's a commercial operation and will make decisions based upon that and its brand image. I really doubt they will ask you what to do.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You don't have to say it. You've condemned Jane Sanders for her actions in the past and even linked Bernie Sanders to them, just like Brady Toensing hoped you would
Useful
Lucky Luke
Well-Known Member
Crying children are the worst, its like their parents haven't heard of duct tape.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I never said it because I don't know enough to decide about Bernie's guilt or innocence.
This is a pattern of yours. You start claiming you know what people are thinking and then accuse them of it. You ought to know by now that nobody is convinced by this odious way yours.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
The right is obsessed with peoples sex life and controlling it,strange coming from the party that supposedly stands for personal freedom,they tend to say one thing and do the opposite on most issues.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
i can usually fart if i try, and that's what i do when there are parents ignoring their crying child. i walk up to them, fart, then walk away. if they say anything about it, i just act like i'm surprised that they mind. it's just a natural thing, after all...like kids crying
peabody2018
Well-Known Member
I doubt that is true.
There is a comedian who does an act about that
peabody2018
Well-Known Member
You may experience a shart doing that