Marijuana stocks drop as Trudeau’s pot czar says Canada won’t rush into legalization

gb123

Well-Known Member
Oh Trudy..what have you done?? (:


As investors flock to Canada’s burgeoning marijuana sector, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government is signaling recreational pot sales aren’t imminent.

Lawmaker Bill Blair -- the former Toronto police chief leading Trudeau’s legalization effort -- confirmed a bill is due in parliament this spring, but it won’t be the last hurdle as ample regulatory work remains. The federal government will take its time and work with provinces, territories and cities to build a framework and develop specific regulations, he said.

There was a problem loading data for this chart
Please reload your browser and try again

The government is also looking for ways to control production, distribution and consumption of legalized marijuana, while testing it for quality and keeping it out of the hands of minors, Mr. Blair said.

“We will take as much time as it takes to do it right,” Mr. Blair, the parliamentary secretary to Canada’s justice minister, said in an interview Monday. “I’m pretty reluctant to suggest a specific time frame, frankly, because I don’t know how long this will take in each of our 10 provinces and three territories.”

Mr. Blair’s comments come as Canada’s nascent marijuana industry balloons, with investor optimism being fueled by analyst estimates that recreational sales could start as early as 2018.

The government’s plan to introduce legislation in the spring of 2017 “could pave the way for the legal sale of recreational cannabis by 2018,” Canaccord Genuity analysts Matt Bottomley and Neil Maruoka said in a November research note. Canada’s recreational pot industry has the potential to reach $6-billion in sales by 2021 if legalization occurs along “expected timelines,” according to the note.

Canopy Growth Corp. became the first marijuana unicorn in 2016 and had a valuation of $1.9-billion on Monday. Other producers, including Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Aphria Inc.Inc., have seen their share prices surge more than 400 per cent in the past 12 months.

Canopy shares fell as much as 7.5 per cent in Toronto while Aurora tumbled 5.1 per cent and Aphria slid 3 per cent.

Dampened Buzz

""“If they delay, there’s going to be a lot of eggs that are going to break in this business,”""" Chris Damas, an analyst at BCMI Research in Barrie, Ont., said by phone Monday. “The valuations are extreme.”

Licensed marijuana producers are in the midst of expanding their capacity and there will be a “huge amount” of excess cannabis if Canada delays legalization, Damas said. The analyst said Mr. Blair’s previous comments suggest it’s unlikely the government will introduce a bill by June and companies with huge valuations “won’t have any serious business” if the recreational market takes longer to come to fruition.

“There could be a lot of disappointment,” he said.

In a separate interview Monday with the Canadian Broadcasting Corp., Mr. Blair said the government was going to design a legalized marijuana system that included measurement and testing of products, as well as enforcement. While the proposed legislation is due this spring, “it’s not sufficient to simply come forward with a bill,” he said.

The government may also explore ways to direct revenue from marijuana sales to funding additional drug treatment, including for fentanyl as Canada grapples with an opioid crisis, he added.

Since taking a position on legalization ahead of the 2015 election, Trudeau has gradually turned toward emphasizing safety, saying regularly it shouldn’t be easier for youth to buy marijuana than to buy beer. Putting the file in the hands of a prominent law-enforcement veteran is another signal the government is approaching legalization with an eye to tight regulation.

Blair declined to comment on whether the regulations could be finalized by 2018 -- an expected election year in Ontario, home to Canopy and other companies -- or 2019, when the next federal election is scheduled.

The Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation issued a report in December that recommends the Canadian government regulate the production of marijuana while provinces control the distribution and retail sales, including through dedicated storefronts with well-trained staff or by mail.
 
The government may also explore ways to direct revenue from marijuana sales to funding additional drug treatment, including for fentanyl as Canada grapples with an opioid crisis, he added.
The timeline hasn't changed, we were told legislation in the spring and implementation in 2018. The delay is still bullshit. It's like they think cannabis is going to be a brand new experience for Canadians. Wasting time and money 'studying' is going to accomplish nothing.
A bunch of things pissed me off but the above quote irks me. Why would they need to delay legalization or waste time 'exploring ways to direct revenue' to drug treatment? They need to direct revenue from alcohol, tobacco and prescription drug sales if they want to tackle the drug crisis. Cannabis users are not responsible for or related to the damage, disease or social costs of addictive and dangerous drugs already legal, taxed and regulated by governments.
 
All a buncha of fluff and fairy tales....the truth is they realize they can't control it and make ALL the money off of it. So now they pretend they are really thinking this through to save the children...only fools listen to them now. I know what the real story is. It's obvious.
It's about the cash as usual. The rich are only about more money and less for others. Nothing new here.
 
The timeline hasn't changed, we were told legislation in the spring and implementation in 2018. The delay is still bullshit. It's like they think cannabis is going to be a brand new experience for Canadians. Wasting time and money 'studying' is going to accomplish nothing.
A bunch of things pissed me off but the above quote irks me. Why would they need to delay legalization or waste time 'exploring ways to direct revenue' to drug treatment? They need to direct revenue from alcohol, tobacco and prescription drug sales if they want to tackle the drug crisis. Cannabis users are not responsible for or related to the damage, disease or social costs of addictive and dangerous drugs already legal, taxed and regulated by governments.

Word!
 
Marijuana Legalization Legislation and Implementation Delays



Dear Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Blair;

I am writing in response to recent news articles quoting you both in regards to the timeline surrounding marijuana legalization. While mine is just one small voice, I believe I echo the sediments of many. I respectfully ask that you consider my points and avoid unnecessary delays in fulfilling this election promise.

I think it was a mistake to not implement a period of decriminalization in the lead up to full legalization. My reasoning is twofold

1) Continuing to enforce laws on a substance that causes negligible societal harm and one the government has pledged to legalize is a waste of police resources, court time and the associated costs to the taxpayer. There is no public support for burdening an already over-taxed population with enforcing obsolete laws. The Canadian Charter states laws must be “justifiable in a free and democratic society”. Given the current acceptance of marijuana use in Canada and the impending change in legal status, I don't believe our laws meet that criteria any longer. 2) A period of decriminalization would allow various levels of government and society in general to provide valuable first-hand input to what should or should not be the focus of any study or regulations. It would serve as a 'dry run' prior to full implementation allowing for a smooth roll out, rather than waiting until after to iron out the bugs.

My other issue is with the anticipated delays while the task force conducts various studies.

Marijuana has been used extensively in Canada for many decades, yet the task force and their study recommendations make it seem like this will be a brand new experience for Canadians. I agree there needs to be rules and regulation but it seems they are already in place for other legal, government regulated products. The laws governing alcohol sales, use and production are equally suitable for marijuana. Given the cost to society due to alcohol, to suggest that tougher restrictions are needed for a substance far more benign and with no deaths attributed to it is foolish.

There is no roadside screening device that will show impairment due to cannabis use. The presence or measurable level of thc only indicates use. The only effective tool to determine marijuana impairment and the ability to operate a motor vehicle is to have the driver perform physical tests. There is also no test for prescription drugs or opiates, the police rely on the physical signs of impairment. I am a supporter of any effort to get impaired drivers off of our roads and I have no doubt a testing device will come at some point, but a delay studying something that does not exist is an unnecessary step.

The other issue that drew my attention was the suggestion that there would be a study to “explore how to divert revenue” to the ongoing drug overdose crisis. I take particular exception at this. I am an alcoholic, almost 8 years sober. I've seen first hand the destruction left in the wake of alcoholism and the enormous cost to taxpayers from the violence, road carnage and disease. I also hear story after story of drug addicts who were addicted while prescribed medication under their doctor's care. What I haven't seen is government making any move to divert money from sales of those products to addiction programs. You wouldn't suspend alcohol and opiate sales until you figure that out, why marijuana? Marijuana users have had no part in either of these societal problems and we should not be made the scapegoats for cleaning up the mess. We will not happily accept any delays we feel are unnecessary or any laws we feel are in excess of what is already in place for substances that pose a far greater risk.

I, and many others voted Liberal in large part for the promise to end marijuana prohibition. Some of us have been working towards this for 40 or 50 years. We respectively ask that you avoid further delay and measure the time needed to implement legalization in months rather than years. You touted your Marijuana legalization plan as being a role model for the world, yet the endless delay is allowing other nations to take the lead.
 
Back
Top