Discussion in 'Medical Marijuana News' started by marijaymade, Mar 11, 2018.
very good! keep on smokin'!
I will. Lol.
I'm thinking of building a forge. I know that's off topic but I know you like art.
I want to make knives and such and try my hands at some metal art.
I read a study released just a couple of years ago, by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. They did a huge meet study, combining the results of other studies plus their own.
The findings related to cancer;
Smoking tobacco increases the risk of cancer.
Smoking cannabis did not increase the risk of cancer.
Smoking both was the same risk as smoking tobacco.
The study did not address other diseases related to smoking.
lol.... You have no clue what you're talking about.
You don't know shit about physiology or pharmacodynamics, and you are utterly clueless to the effects of respirable particulates & carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons on the lungs.
Pick up a textbook.
We read studies too.
No one is saying smoking is harmless, just that it doesn't raise risk of cancer.
Maybe if you were less defensive you'd be taken more seriously.
newsflash: The thread pertains to smoking cannabis and an increased risk for lung cancer --> not chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Separate entities altogether.
Please. I've already posted peer-reviewed research which proves otherwise.
It's like trying to have a conversation with a wall.
So you admit smoking carcinogens is harmful.... yet it somehow doesn't increase the risk of lung cancer?
Not a chance.
To be clear,
Nicotine is a carcinogenic.
THC is not.
It's the mode of transportation that causes unwanted results.
Kinda like using Communism to spread Freedom.
To be clear, we're discussing the effects of marijuana and [all] of it's chemical-constituents. Not THC in isolation.
And I've already posted peer-reviewed evidence for the presence of mutagens, carcinogens and polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
Then you should be arguing about smoking tomato vines, have you seen the mutations coming out of hog lots?
The color of the mailbox has little to do with the flames coming out of the Barn.
find me one cancer patient that has cancer because of marijuana use. smoking anything is bad for you, doesn't matter what it is, there are better ways to ingest things than burning it. i'm not arguing with the study you posted, i'm saying that even though it contains those things, there's not one single case of marijuana causing cancer. so maybe the nicotine does play a larger part than you seem to want to admit.
something definitely does. if you have two things that contain many of the same chemicals, and one gives people cancer, and one doesn't, maybe you should look at the things that are different, instead of the things that are the same?
Quote me one one more time to show you are not upset.
Factoid boy is what I will call you. Spouts of some shit he read yet can't grow a plant or diagnose problems.
I'm talking lung disease all together. The benefits of cannabis cancel out the negative.
I've read your post in other threads. Strutting around like a rooster all puffed out. Anyone disagrees you have a conniption.
Not if you're smoking it and have lung disease or are at risk for it genius.
There you go again.
U can’t deny his gifs are awesome!
Separate names with a comma.