Math isn't your strong point is it?
Theoretically. your putting out 200,000 lumens, i say theoretically because the light spread will not be completely even, but for the sake of math(and not accounting for different reflectors) we will just even it out to 200,000 over your entire 10x10 area.
so 10x10=100 sq ft.
200,000 lumens per 100sq ft
if you suck at math like me, just knock off the zeros
200,000 for 100sq ft
20,000 for 10sq ft
2,000 for 1 sq ft
so with that area your looking at 2,000 lumens per square foot.
Why go with 400s if your using 4 in that area? why not 3 600s for the same wattage and more lumens. 600s have the best lumen/watt output.
400w, good bulbs can put around 50,000 lumens 50,000/400 equals 125 lumens a watt
600w, good bulbs generally around 95,000 lumens. 95,000/600 159 lumens a watt
100w, good bulb again generally around 145,000 L. 145,000/1000 equals 145 lumens a watt
another benefit is that the 600s are no harder(for the most part) to cool than 400s so they can often be as close as the 400s to the plants which helps a lot with the loss of light over distance.
PS the 3 600s will net you about 2850 lumens per sq ft. Some say you need 5-7000, but i'm not so sure about that much.