Who beat her? What do they think of medical marijuana?
I love her last question. "Why am I in the picture?" Because one in the bush is worth two in the hand.
I'm sorry,,, That is awful, but I just couldn't help myself.
How about a new term? "Punching the ballot"
Assault! Can you believe it? Even the poodle agrees with me.And the Tea Party assault doesn't stop in Delaware. One of our most valuable progressive Senators, a man who has fought as hard as anyone for our civil liberties, Russ Feingold, is under heavy attack by a very wealthy, very extreme candidate who has pledged to spend millions attacking Russ. Russ stood up for us against the abuses of the Bush Administration. He's one of my best colleagues in the Senate, and he needs our help.
She was just announced as the winner...............doesnt matter much on the MMJ front the state has passed MMJ twice only to be vetoed buy the governor.
On the political front, I wouldnt get all worked up about some "tea Party" victory in NH, the guy she beat was the Tea Party favorite, not her.
Does this mean we should ignore the Teabaggers toppling incumbent Republicans all throughout the primary season, too?She was just announced as the winner...............doesnt matter much on the MMJ front the state has passed MMJ twice only to be vetoed buy the governor.
On the political front, I wouldnt get all worked up about some "tea Party" victory in NH, the guy she beat was the Tea Party favorite, not her.
Does this mean we should ignore the Teabaggers toppling incumbent Republicans all throughout the primary season, too?
To me it means that when it comes to Sarah Palin, the Teabaggers are not all smitten. In this case she stood up for the Establishment candidate.
Meaning Palin is not always synonymous with the Tea Party movement, as some Proggies have suggested.
That's one way to look at it.Not at all saying that they should be ignored, if I was still a Republican it would scare the shit out of me......I said over a year ago this was gonna happen., it's no surprise to me.
I think the Republican party just met their version of Ralph Nader. The "tea party" movement is squeezing out moderates in the party with their hunt for "RINO's".....while it may whip up the Conservative base in the general election it's could backfire by losing any moderate or independent vote.
the year of the anti-incumbents!
if i'm not mistaken, only like 10 or so of the incumbents have been defeated in primaries so far. most victories have gone to established, INCUMBENT career politicians.... 300+ IN FACT.
anti-incumbent fever is just media hype. there's still time i guess........
[youtube]Li7arAbbkV4[/youtube]
Not at all saying that they should be ignored, if I was still a Republican it would scare the shit out of me......I said over a year ago this was gonna happen., it's no surprise to me.
I think the Republican party just met their version of Ralph Nader. The "tea party" movement is squeezing out moderates in the party with their hunt for "RINO's".....while it may whip up the Conservative base in the general election it's could backfire by losing any moderate or independent vote.
That's one way to look at it.
Another way to look at it is that the Teabaggers are Godzilla rampaging through the Japanese Countryside (the Primaries) on the way to Tokyo (Washington).
Which makes the Democrats equal to millions of terrified and screaming Japanese.
Christine O'Donnell collected over half a million dollars in campaign contributions today.
How many Democratic candidates are running ads highlighting their support of ObamaCare? Zero.
The last campaign ad promoting Ocare was run by Harry Reid in April.
Speaking of Harry Reid. His own son dropped his last name in his run for the Governor's Office. He's just Rory now.
Vote for Rory.
Why not change it to something with a little pizazz like Madonna, Cher, or even Pink?
Pink would be the most appropriate considering what is going to happen to the Progressive agenda come November 2nd.
My rants get raves.Johnny, you didn't address my question at all....you just ranted for the most part.
How is christine o'donnell (the 'tea party' candidate) any different from other republicans. She's spent her whole life pushing 'values' (i.e. not masturbating), is against abortion no matter what the circumstances and hates gays. How is she any different from the 'establishment' republicans? What does her platform have to do with fiscal conservatism? This really is lipstick on a pig, nothing else. On top of everything else, she seems like a bit of a dummy....she also thinks there are people hiding in her bushes or something, so perhaps a bit of a crazy too...?
Karl Rove gets it....I'm surprised that you don't, johnny.