Lawyer Kirk Tousaw is gobsmacked by College of Physicians and Surgeons' approach to medical marijuan

gb123

Well-Known Member
Kirk Tousaw is an acknowledged authority on laws regarding marijuana. He's testified on several occasions before parliamentary committees on the topic.
Tousaw also recently argued the landmark Owen Smith case before the Supreme Court of Canada.

In this instance, the Conservative government is trying to overturn a B.C. Court of Appeal decision dismissing trafficking charges against Smith, who baked cookies for a compassion club.

For years, Tousaw has been witnessing how governments have made it difficult for patients with serious medical conditions to obtain medical cannabis.

But the B.C. lawyer declared that he was "absolutely gobsmacked" when he learned that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C. had distributed a memo requiring doctors to adhere to an age limit on patients who may receive medical cannabis.

"I mean, these are people who have had significant training in the sciences and in medicine," Tousaw said. "For that type of organization to publish a document or some guidelines that are so unscientific—that are so lacking in empirical justification—it just shows how much progress we still need to make to overcome some of the myths and the stigmas associated with the consumption of cannabis for medical purposes."

The Straight reported this week that the physicians' regulatory body's professional standards and guidelines memo states that it's "not appropriate" to sign a medical document to allow anyone under 25 to have legal access to cannabis.

Tousaw said he was shocked that this age limit was imposed when cannabis has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for a range of conditions, including Dravet Syndrome. It's a rare, lifelong, genetically caused form of epilepsy that begins in infancy.

Medical cannabis is used as a pain reliever for conditions ranging from cancer to multiple sclerosis to Crohn's disease.

"Epilepsy doesn't have an age limit," Tousaw scoffed. "Cancer doesn't have an age limit."

In addition, the college memo concluded that cannabis shouldn't be used by people with cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, a substance-use disorder, a cannabis disorder, or a history of psychosis.

The college's senior deputy registrar, Dr. Galt Wilson, told the Straight that the memo is now being revised to address input from doctors.

Tousaw noted that marijuana is safer than prescription drugs that physicians already prescribe to children in appropriate circumstances.

He declared that it's "shocking" for "a college to come up with a set of guidelines that is so divorced from empirical reality".

Meanwhile, Kamloops emergency-room physician Ian Mitchell told the Straight earlier this week that the college's rules are "excessive" and "make it almost impossible for anybody to comply with them".

Last month, Mitchell told the Straight that preliminary evidence suggests that medical cannabis might be effective in treating posttraumatic stress disorder.

His research team hopes to recruit people this fall for a study looking at this issue in greater detail. They plan to pay special attention to an extract from marijuana plants known as cannabidiol, also known as CBD.

Mitchell also said last month that CBD has been demonstrated in studies to be an effective antipsychotic.

But according to the now-recalled memo from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C., doctors cannot make medical cannabis available to anyone who's demonstrated psychosis in the past.

Tousaw said that he believes that the college risks having its medical-cannabis rules being found to be "patently unreasonable" by a judge.

"If they put these kinds of shackles on individual physicians to the detriment of sick British Columbians, we will be in the courts pretty quickly," Tousaw emphasized. "We'll be looking at judicial review. At a certain point when you are causing suffering—make no mistake, they will be causing suffering with this—you should be held liable for that."

Kirk Tousaw will join lawyer John Conroy at a Continuing Legal Education Society of B.C. seminar at the Pan Pacific Hotel or via live webinar on May 29. It will address the changing legal landscape for medical cannabis in Canada.
 
God fucking dammit. How low do you have to be really. I swear to God if we lose the trial for growers rights, this should be investigated further. Tousaw is right in that this group of people who have medical degrees for Gods sake, are making unreasonable and uneducated restrictions which are not based on any type of data.
 
Time to start lawsuits against the college and doctors. Until they can offer pharmaceuticals that are less dangerous than marijuana,forcing me to take them and suffer the side effects in order to qualify for mmj is giving doctors too much power over my right to choose my treatment. The 'do no harm' oath they took would make prescribing the least harmful medication first and then progressing stronger drugs if needed the obvious choice.
 
"We'll be looking at judicial review. At a certain point when you are causing suffering—make no mistake, they will be causing suffering with this—you should be held liable for that."

You might have told HC with a smug confident voice to Fuck Off...now you are going to get bitch slapped into reality. You mean spirited, heartless, egotistical bunch of self indulgent bastards.
I hope you get your ass sued. I hope it costs you millions....just who the fuck do you think you are?
The Colleges has had years to work on the mmj issue...if it needs revising then it's plainly obvious the senior management needs replacing. Is it incompetence or an agenda?

DID YOU FORGET?.....#1 RULE....DO NO HARM...fucking assholes!
 
"We'll be looking at judicial review. At a certain point when you are causing suffering—make no mistake, they will be causing suffering with this—you should be held liable for that."

You might have told HC with a smug confident voice to Fuck Off...now you are going to get bitch slapped into reality. You mean spirited, heartless, egotistical bunch of self indulgent bastards.
I hope you get your ass sued. I hope it costs you millions....just who the fuck do you think you are?
The Colleges has had years to work on the mmj issue...if it needs revising then it's plainly obvious the senior management needs replacing. Is it incompetence or an agenda?

DID YOU FORGET?.....#1 RULE....DO NO HARM...fucking assholes!
And it isn't only mmj, a doctor does not like to be told what works best...he knows better than any stupid patient. A doctor's ego does not trump my right to choose my treatment. Most of them aren't intelligent enough to refill a stapler, but they 'Know" how to treat you? Would you let your mechanic just do whatever he wants and give you the bill (or destroys your car) and then not say anything so you don't hurt his feelings? Doctors are the most arrogant, self-righteous scum on the planet and I do not have the self control to sit in an office an be talked down to by one of these goofs without telling them how it is.
Someday I'll tell you how I really feel!
 
The college's senior deputy registrar, Dr. Galt Wilson, told the Straight that the memo is now being revised to address input from doctors.

Shouldn't doctors have been consulted before the release of this report?
They probably consulted 3 anti advocate types...and that's it....but its sure sounds like back peddling again....
they keep releasing shit and then revising....what they mean .....
Time is passing them by.....and they can't keep up....everything is now retroactive...
Once again doctors try to unboil an egg...
 
They probably consulted 3 anti advocate types...and that's it....but its sure sounds like back peddling again....
they keep releasing shit and then revising....what they mean .....
Time is passing them by.....and they can't keep up....everything is now retroactive...
Once again doctors try to unboil an egg...
How can HC release a statement on health treatment without consulting doctors? Are they qualified? Would that not be considered practicing medicine without a license? We are at the mercy of bureaucrats making the decisions on our health.
 
It is an insight into the base feelings of Doctors in general. Especially the ones in charge. They don't like " pot " or those who use it. Not allowed at the country club old chap you see. These are the rules of bitter old school golf club alcoholics and wife beaters.
Come on guys, we all know whats up here. Same old same old..... Non MJ folks ( in this case ruling doctors ) still putting the kibosh on what they hate....NIXON LIVES still.
Court is the only thing that will change rules. These old guys will die still not believing MJ has any use of any kind.
 
Hippy I think you are incorrect that doctors will die not knowing or believing in mj positive results,
Lets face it they are the puppets of big Pharma, so until big PHarma takes over the mj business and tells
Doctors to prescribe it they wont, think of it like this big Pharma is like a big ol biker gang, the doctors are
Prescribed what they are told to and what gets them the tickets to those paid Bahamas "medical" conferences
Since big Parma still has alot of diazapenes opiates ssri's antipsychotic's and the like (all of which have killed my relatives)
With patents, they gotta move that shit first, while they ramp up their ideas fir cannabinoids.
 
and the only difference between the oil gw pharma extracts and the oil I extract is that gw pharma has permission.
Your oil is not DILUTED!!!
or is your oil weak enough just to hold you over until ,,your next buy.
The shit works!!!! At least the meds made by patients kick ass by comparison to what GM pharma makes
..and that's proven!
 
Hippy I think you are incorrect that doctors will die not knowing or believing in mj positive results,
Lets face it they are the puppets of big Pharma, so until big PHarma takes over the mj business and tells
Doctors to prescribe it they wont, think of it like this big Pharma is like a big ol biker gang, the doctors are
Prescribed what they are told to and what gets them the tickets to those paid Bahamas "medical" conferences
Since big Parma still has alot of diazapenes opiates ssri's antipsychotic's and the like (all of which have killed my relatives)
With patents, they gotta move that shit first, while they ramp up their ideas fir cannabinoids.
Ya could be true Breeder. I just figure until most of the old school doc's retire or kack out, it's gonna be a fight. I'm betting it's mostly old school doc's in charge at the college. I feel until more young doctors are in place the old guys will dictate...but I'm only guessing that's right.
 
Back
Top