IGROW and Inductive Lighting

NHS Garden Gurus

Active Member
Better Vegetative light is few and far between when compared to inductive lighting. I wonder if any users have tried using an IGROW inductive light.

The IGROW has a smaller carbon footprint, better PAR, and most importantly, it shows results.
 

Attachments

  • igrow.png
    igrow.png
    95.7 KB · Views: 26
Better PAR compared to?

Induction always seemed much more expensive but much longer lasting T5 to me
 
btw :lol: @ Patent pending for light spectrum and that a 400 watt fixture can replace 1000 watt HPS
1200 dollars

Even the most underdriven Cree panels are cheaper than that per dollar/watt
 
From iGROW website...

"iGROW and Nikola Tesla are synonymous. iGROW is one of Tesla’s
greatest gifts to mankind
. We think Tesla would be very happy to know that his light technology has been developed to be the finest agricultural light, once again beating out Edison. We are very proud that iGROW can help keep Tesla’s inventions and legacy alive and well into the 21st century and beyond."

Nuff said.
 
From iGROW website...

"iGROW and Nikola Tesla are synonymous. iGROW is one of Tesla’s
greatest gifts to mankind
. We think Tesla would be very happy to know that his light technology has been developed to be the finest agricultural light, once again beating out Edison. We are very proud that iGROW can help keep Tesla’s inventions and legacy alive and well into the 21st century and beyond."

Nuff said.
Tesla would puke on their crap
 
Here's a chart from a science based test comparing various lights and types. Induction BARELY beats T5's........... And look at the LED list, looks like some of the those high price comercial lights are no better than a Chinese light!


led chart-1.jpg
 
Back
Top