How gun free zones are supposed to work..

By survival of the fittest, those with guns survive, those without don't.

History is a shining example of this.

Kill or be killed, all the "guns are bad, I refuse to have one" stuff doesn't mean much if you get shot and die.
 
How come people will rush a guy with a gun, And run from a guy with a CHAINSAW?

Guns are just tools..People kill with hammer's a screwdrivers But there isn't a hammer free zone..
 
How come people will rush a guy with a gun, And run from a guy with a CHAINSAW?

Guns are just tools..People kill with hammer's a screwdrivers But there isn't a hammer free zone..

You can rush the guy with the gun while I run away :)

Anything can be used to kill someone... quite literally. Some things are just more effeciant than others.

While I'm thinking about it... the most effeciant way to kill a bunch of people would be to throw them into a giant fire... hmmm :joint:
 
By survival of the fittest, those with guns survive, those without don't.

History is a shining example of this.

Kill or be killed, all the "guns are bad, I refuse to have one" stuff doesn't mean much if you get shot and die.

You're at a greater risk of being killed by your own gun than using it to save your own life. This has been proven time and time again.
 
You're at a greater risk of being killed by your own gun than using it to save your own life.


Myth: Guns are 43 times more likely to kill yourself or a family member than a criminal

Fact:
Of the 43 deaths reported in this flawed study, 37 (86%) were suicides. Other deaths involved criminal activity between the family members (drug deals gone bad).98

Fact: Of the remaining deaths, the deceased family members include felons, drug dealers, violent spouses committing assault, and other criminals.99

Fact: Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator.100 This means you are much more likely to prevent a crime without bloodshed than hurt a family member or yourself.
 
Back
Top