HMM.... So there was no wiretapping going on really?

not new at all. trump was being investigated last summer, but im not aware of any concrete revelations so far. if there was, we would've heard about it already. for example, hillary..
 
not new at all. trump was being investigated last summer, but im not aware of any concrete revelations so far. if there was, we would've heard about it already. for example, hillary..
Nah dude read it this surveillance was not associated with the FBI investigation i smell something fishy.....
 
The NSA is still listening to everything, so does it matter? They could have his communications from standard collection methods vs specific targeting. Easy work around.
 
The NSA is still listening to everything, so does it matter? They could have his communications from standard collection methods vs specific targeting. Easy work around.
Im more concerned that the names were unmasked even though there was nothing there and that it was widely disseminated.
 
Nah dude read it this surveillance was not associated with the FBI investigation i smell something fishy.....

Yep, I read it. Agree on the fishiness. Obama and co were doing all they could to screw him over it appears, but came up with nada. They just kept doing what they were doing after he got elected, watching, digging, and stirring the pot. Links to old articles below.


https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html?_r=0

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...ummer-2016-senate-to-investigate-854849603559

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...surprises-fbi-probing-trumps-russia-ties.html
 
Im more concerned that the names were unmasked even though there was nothing there and that it was widely disseminated.
Thats been one of the biggest criticisms. Typically, names were redacted in those releases. But not these particular ones. They spread them as widely as possible. I'll try to find the article for this one
 
The NSA is still listening to everything, so does it matter? They could have his communications from standard collection methods vs specific targeting. Easy work around.
well, in that case, you shouldnt have a problem cc'ing the NSA on your emails since they could just to do an "easy work around." so it doesnt matter, right?
 
"FBI Director James Comey appeared before the panel on Monday and confirmed that the FBI launched a counterintelligence investigation in July into Russia’s election meddling, including possible coordination with the Trump campaign."
 
Are you concerned about the unmasking in general, or just because of who it was?

I couldn't care less about the info being out there. If our POS politicians were, genuinely, more honest, we wouldn't have these issues.

but wait, anyone honest enough to do the job correctly would never be interested in a political career
like cops, any smart enough to do the job correctly would also be smart enough to decline the offering
 
"FBI Director James Comey appeared before the panel on Monday and confirmed that the FBI launched a counterintelligence investigation in July into Russia’s election meddling, including possible coordination with the Trump campaign."
Nunez said this had nothing to do with the FBI investigation.
 
Are you concerned about the unmasking in general, or just because of who it was?

I couldn't care less about the info being out there. If our POS politicians were, genuinely, more honest, we wouldn't have these issues.
Im concerned about all unmasking when unwarranted.
 
Back
Top