George Zimmerman is sub-human.

BM9AGS

Well-Known Member
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/george-zimmerman-retweets-picture-trayvon-martin-corpse-article-1.2376777

Even if it were really self-defense, you have to be a heartless psychopath to take pride in doing what he did. He is disgusting.
Yeah but who's to say who really owns the accounts of who's doing that. It could be a black lives matter cronie trying to stir the pot. Or even al sharpton

I thought it's been established that regardless of the situation that happened George was a pos before and after it.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
I am not a lib. I am just really, really confused how someone can chase someone down, and then claim self-defense. Self-defense has to start with trying to get AWAY. You can't go start a fight, get your ass kicked, shoot the person and walk away free and call it justice. If you instigate the incident, how the hell can that be self-defense?
Then, my 2nd huge problem is that at no point has he shown even one ounce of regret. He actually seems to take pride in taking the life of another human being. Anyone who knows anything about death knows that is not normal human emotions. There is something really screwed up in that guy and he will kill again.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I am not a lib. I am just really, really confused how someone can chase someone down, and then claim self-defense. Self-defense has to start with trying to get AWAY. You can't go start a fight, get your ass kicked, shoot the person and walk away free and call it justice. If you instigate the incident, how the hell can that be self-defense?
Then, my 2nd huge problem is that at no point has he shown even one ounce of regret. He actually seems to take pride in taking the life of another human being. Anyone who knows anything about death knows that is not normal human emotions. There is something really screwed up in that guy and he will kill again.
It's quite simple. If you are legally traversing through a public area, even for the purpose of observing another individual, you have a right to defend yourself if that individual attacks you. There was ZERO evidence that GZ started a fight. No matter how many times libs try to paint "observation" as a nefarious act, it fails because it doesn't matter. It was legal for him to do so, proven by the fact he wasn't charged for undertaking said observation. The cold hard facts are GZ was well within his rights to mosey down that sidewalk, FOR ANY REASON.

As to your second problem, why should he feel regret for saving his own life? Granted, the taking of a life is tragic, but, taking it to save your own life should illicit no emotional response other than relief.

Your confusion stems from an incorrect assumption that GZ is guilty.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
It's quite simple. If you are legally traversing through a public area, even for the purpose of observing another individual, you have a right to defend yourself if that individual attacks you. There was ZERO evidence that GZ started a fight. No matter how many times libs try to paint "observation" as a nefarious act, it fails because it doesn't matter. It was legal for him to do so, proven by the fact he wasn't charged for undertaking said observation. The cold hard facts are GZ was well within his rights to mosey down that sidewalk, FOR ANY REASON.

As to your second problem, why should he feel regret for saving his own life? Granted, the taking of a life is tragic, but, taking it to save your own life should illicit no emotional response other than relief.

Your confusion stems from an incorrect assumption that GZ is guilty.
Got it, you are out of your mind. It was legal for him to do it, doesn't mean it is right. It is illegal for you to smoke marijuana but does that make it morally wrong to do so?

Also easy to see you have never experienced death.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Got it, you are out of your mind. It was legal for him to do it, doesn't mean it is right. It is illegal for you to smoke marijuana but does that make it morally wrong to do so?

Also easy to see you have never experienced death.
Why wouldn't it be right? Since when is it morally wrong to "observe" someone you suspect may be about to commit a crime against your neighbors? What world do you live in that people don't look out for each other? What part of calling the cops and keeping an eye on the individual by walking down a public sidewalk was soooo heinous? You've listened to the village idiots in here for too long, their wild conclusions and flaccid arguments have seeped into your brain pan.

Again, your viewpoint only withstands scrutiny if you have some magical power that gives you knowledge that ONLY George Zimmerman possesses. If you believe you do, then you're out or your mind.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
Why wouldn't it be right? Since when is it morally wrong to "observe" someone you suspect may be about to commit a crime against your neighbors? What world do you live in that people don't look out for each other? What part of calling the cops and keeping an eye on the individual by walking down a public sidewalk was soooo heinous? You've listened to the village idiots in here for too long, their wild conclusions and flaccid arguments have seeped into your brain pan.

Again, your viewpoint only withstands scrutiny if you have some magical power that gives you knowledge that ONLY George Zimmerman possesses. If you believe you do, then you're out or your mind.
Well Muy, you seem like a real tough guy so let me ask you this...

Let's say you are minding your own business and take a walk to the store and on the way back some crazed dipshit looking to kill someone starts stalking you... What would you do? Run home and tell mommy? Call the police? Or turn around and confront the stalker?

Honest answer, what would you do?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I don't like or dislike him. Just as I have from the beginning, I only offer defense from unreasonable and unfair attack.

You libs convicted him long before the facts came out, continued after the facts came out and didn't let his acquittal slow you down a bit. Then, regardless of the GIANT pile of failure you amassed, you INCORRECTLY convicted him in every subsequent instance that turned out to be false.

You hypocritical, blood thirsty psychopaths cheered and called for his death when the nutjob shot out his window in an attempt to murder him. I'll gladly accept the piece of shit comment when it comes from the likes of you.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
I don't like or dislike him. Just as I have from the beginning, I only offer defense from unreasonable and unfair attack.

You libs convicted him long before the facts came out, continued after the facts came out and didn't let his acquittal slow you down a bit. Then, regardless of the GIANT pile of failure you amassed, you INCORRECTLY convicted him in every subsequent instance that turned out to be false.

You hypocritical, blood thirsty psychopaths cheered and called for his death when the nutjob shot out his window in an attempt to murder him. I'll gladly accept the piece of shit comment when it comes from the likes of you.
If you were offering defense from "unreasonable and unfair attack" you wouldn't be defending Zimmerman.
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
Wow still news about this idiot wasn't he the guy who shot a kid with nothing but chips and skittles in his hands? Must have been the south otherwise you can't kill black people cause they scary to pussies. I don't understand why are blacks scary? The heavyweight champion is white!! Black people are not scary they get knocked the fuck out to!

I love guns but damn you should have to show you ain't a bitch first even that black guy got away with murder for being a pussy guy was just looking for a fight punch him in the throat don't shoot him. Americans lack discipline! If you can't fight like a man you don't get a gun till you can. :bigjoint:
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Well Muy, you seem like a real tough guy so let me ask you this...

Let's say you are minding your own business and take a walk to the store and on the way back some neighborhood watch guy is legally observing you... What would you do? Run home and tell mommy? Call the police? Or turn around and confront the stalker?

Honest answer, what would you do?
First of all, I fixed the question to resemble reality.

Secondly, I would continue on my way. If he isn't hindering my movement, I have no reason to confront him. I arrive home safely and play XBOX while getting stoned. Happy ending for all.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
First of all, I fixed the question to resemble reality.

Secondly, I would continue on my way. If he isn't hindering my movement, I have no reason to confront him. I arrive home safely and play XBOX while getting stoned. Happy ending for all.
Yeah, I would have confronted him. No doubt in my mind and I guess in some people's mind I would have earned a death penalty for confronting someone stalking me. We can agree to disagree. Zimmerman is nothing but pussy stain who killed an innocent kid.
 
Top