Future Navy toys

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Relevant? What a weasel word.

What I am (and you have decided not to recognize) is that I am correct. Relevant, schmelephant.

I do not need to resort to an argumentum ad populum to buttress my observation.
He didn't have to be an asshole to me. He started the fight, then claimed offense. That's pretty fucking weak. Have you and your populum considered that?

I thought not.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
He didn't have to be an asshole to me. He started the fight, then claimed offense. That's pretty fucking weak. Have you and your populum considered that?

I thought not.
Consider it? You have done nothing but repeat that same thing ad nauseam. I reject your premise as I have repeatedly told you. What you reject is that you are responsible for your behavior, and claiming his somehow makes you blameless for your own bigotry is what I reject.

Don't you have to get back to your virtue signaling by returning to championing your deluded drama queen? Don't let this thread stand in your way, good sir.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
It's spelled Mudd just like the doctor that treated John Wilkes Booth.
Or Harry Mudd on Star Trek

This citation comes from John Badcock (a.k.a. 'J. Bee’) in Slang - A Dictionary of the Turf etc., 1823:

"Mud - a stupid twaddling fellow. ‘And his name is mud!’ ejaculated upon the conclusion of a silly oration, or of a leader in the Courier."

https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/your-name-is-mud.html

Dr. Mudd wasn't born until 1833.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
At first this thread sucked. Definite 1 star garbage, right away.

But then....

This thread began to be awesome sauce. I'm talking prime time, solid 4 star material.

The last 4 pages I will read again, I will recommend to friends and family. And so will my purple bulbous.

Thanks, and have a nice day.
 

haight

Well-Known Member

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Consider it? You have done nothing but repeat that same thing ad nauseam. I reject your premise as I have repeatedly told you. What you reject is that you are responsible for your behavior, and claiming his somehow makes you blameless for your own bigotry is what I reject.

Don't you have to get back to your virtue signaling by returning to championing your deluded drama queen? Don't let this thread stand in your way, good sir.
So it's okay for him to call me names, then engage in an epic display of pearl clutching if I use the same words.

I get he's your friend. Hypocrites flock together.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Yes, decisive. The question now is did it win or lose the battle?
Depends on which one.

No weapon resides with one side forever. I wonder how Americans will feel when the enemies we made by indiscriminately drone striking their citizens start doing the same to us?

The American military has killed millions of civilians since 9/11/2001. There has not been any declaration of war. I make my dissent because I don't want that blood on my conscience.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So it's okay for him to call me names, then engage in an epic display of pearl clutching if I use the same words.

I get he's your friend. Hypocrites flock together.
You have something in common with somebody you purportedly despise. You repeat the same tripe over and over in the hope that someone, perhaps even you, will begin to believe it. The technique is called the Big Lie.

Good luck with that Hermann von ttystikk. Here is a sterling example of your course of performance.

 
Top