too larry
Well-Known Member
In an effort to undo everything 44 did, 45's EPA says that it isn't fair to count any health benefits other than from the removal of mercury {such as lower soot and particulate numbers, which will save lives from less lung disease}. When those saved lives are taken out of the equation, the cost is much higher per life saved. The proposed rollback is to the 2012 levels.
"In another proposed reversal of an Obama-era standard, the Environmental Protection Agency Friday said limiting mercury and other toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants is not cost-effective and should not be considered "appropriate and necessary."
The EPA says it is keeping the 2012 restrictions in place for now, in large part because utilities have already spent billions to comply with them. But environmental groups worry the move is a step toward repealing the limits and could make it harder to impose other regulations in the future.
In a statement, the EPA said it is "providing regulatory certainty by transparently and accurately taking account of both costs and benefits."
https://www.npr.org/2018/12/28/6791...imits-on-coal-plants-too-costly-not-necessary
"In another proposed reversal of an Obama-era standard, the Environmental Protection Agency Friday said limiting mercury and other toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants is not cost-effective and should not be considered "appropriate and necessary."
The EPA says it is keeping the 2012 restrictions in place for now, in large part because utilities have already spent billions to comply with them. But environmental groups worry the move is a step toward repealing the limits and could make it harder to impose other regulations in the future.
In a statement, the EPA said it is "providing regulatory certainty by transparently and accurately taking account of both costs and benefits."
https://www.npr.org/2018/12/28/6791...imits-on-coal-plants-too-costly-not-necessary