DIY: Dual Spectrum Light?

T.H.Cammo

Well-Known Member
OK, here's what I want to do:
Make a DIY version of those expensive "Dual Spectrum" HID lights that are starting to become popular. Not the "Extended Spectrum" HPS (that has 30% added blue spectrum), but the ones that actually claim to have one section that is MH and one section that is HPS. Hopefully the "end result" will fit into some kind of air cooled hood or cool-tube arrangement! I want to "start small" and experiment with something suitable for a "Micro-grow" or a "Mini-grow" (hopefully something around 250 watts or less).

Here's the method to my madness:
Obviousely I can't make one bulb that holds both sections like the ones on the market, so I plan to use a number of seperate bulbs and ballasts / in combination. My plan (penciled-in) is to use two 70 watt HPS "Security Lights" -or- one of those "el cheapo" 150 watt HPS "Vapor Proof" lights from E-conolite, for the HPS part of the spectrum. For the MH part of the spectrum there are a variety of choices; Security Lights also come in several sizes of MH, or I could just buy a seperate "Ballast Kit".

Here's my delima:
My problem isn't how to make the thing work, or even how to put it together (I've, pretty much, got that all figured out). It's all about picking the "right" ratio of HPS light to MH light. Most "mixed" spectrum or "dual" spectrum HID's on the market use somewhere between a 1-to-1 and a 2-to-1 ratio.
Most information on "mixed" flourescents and CFL's seems to favor a ratio of about 2-to-1 , up to about, 4-to-1. And then switching the ratio between vegging and flowering. Switching the ratios for flowering has always made a lot of sense to me! I might even do that with the HID's!
Now we get to the real far end of the line, LED's. The older (N.A.S.A.) literature said that the best ratio of "red" LED's, to "Blue" LED's was something like 9 or 10-to-1. Most of the commercial LED units available today seem to be "only" somewhere between 4-to-1 and 6-to-1 - but you can see where I'm going with this! There is a big difference in the ratios of different types of light! I'm thinking that the ratios for LED's are so lop-sided because of the narrow band-width each LED puts out, whereas flouros and HID's have a wider spectrum (so they overlap more).

Here is what I need to know:
Have there been any studies done, or is there any information available (more than just advertising bull shit), that would help determine just what the optimum ratio of HPS and MH lights should be for growing? Also - what do some of you light savy people think about switching the ratio (of HPS and MH) between vegging and flowering, to me it just seems like the right thing to do!

I would really like to kick this idea around a little! So, anybody with information (even questions), please feel free!
 

beginningbotanist420

Well-Known Member
HPS is most effective in flowering when used in a 2:1 ratio with MH [2/3's HPS; 1/3 MH]. I'd say use the 150w e-conolight with a 70w MH security light. Thats close enough to 2:1, and is less than 250w.

:peace:
 

T.H.Cammo

Well-Known Member
HPS is most effective in flowering when used in a 2:1 ratio with MH [2/3's HPS; 1/3 MH]. I'd say use the 150w e-conolight with a 70w MH security light. Thats close enough to 2:1, and is less than 250w.

:peace:
Yeah! That sounds about right to me too! That's one of the options I've been playing with. Thanks for the confirmation! Anybody else?
 

epixbud

Well-Known Member
no answere's from me, but i have been lookin into the dual spectrim systems for a bit, and the ones i been lookin at are a single ballest with dual bulb outlets, usualy 1000w ballist with a 600w hps and 400w mh, both bulbs mounted evenly spaced in a boxish air cooled reflector, wonder what the ratio is with them.... i'm gonna watch this thread, i'd like to know too!


Check out my Grow
https://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/107075-ak-47-x-super-silver.html
 

T.H.Cammo

Well-Known Member
no answere's from me, but i have been lookin into the dual spectrim systems for a bit, and the ones i been lookin at are a single ballest with dual bulb outlets, usualy 1000w ballist with a 600w hps and 400w mh, both bulbs mounted evenly spaced in a boxish air cooled reflector, wonder what the ratio is with them.... i'm gonna watch this thread, i'd like to know too!
Yeah, These are about the first ones that I ever saw. I just dug out an old (2006) catalog, it shows the "Super Spectrum Dual Bulb lighting Systems" by Sun System @ $500. That is pretty much the same idea as what I want to do, except I'll be using seperate ballasts with lower power!

If the system is using a 400 watter and a 600 watter, the ratio would be 1 1/2-to-1 (or) 1-to-1 1/2, it just depends on how it's being stated. For example: It would take 1 1/2 400 watters to "equal" 1 600 watter, so the ratio would be 1 1/2-to-1. If you compare it the other way; 1 600 watter "equals" 1 1/2 400 watters, so the ratio would be 1-to-1 1/2. You have to be careful with the way you state it, but the math is pretty simple. When you add in the terms HPS or MH it can get, either, confusing or more complicated. Most of the information that I have found, pretty well, narrows it down to two different ratios for HID's.

One ratio is used for both "veg" and "flower", we'll call it the "1 1/2-to-1", it's the one that uses a 600 watt HPS section and a 400 watt MH section with a 1,000 watt ballast. There is also a bulb that uses equal watts, 300 watts HPS and 300 watts MH (that would be a 1-to-1 ratio) with a 600 watt ballast - I believe this "equal" 600 watter is meant to be used in both stages of growth also.

The other "popular" ratio I see alot is 2-to-1 (like beginingbotonist420 mentioned). I really think this ratio is perfect for pulling "the old switcheroo" - mid stream. For example: use a 150 watt MH and a 70 watt (close enough) HPS for vegging, then reverse the ratio and use a 150 watt HPS and a 70 watt MH for flowering. I think this "Best of both world's" approach could supply the best spectrum for the stage the plant is in. I would really be interested in hearing from anybody that has information that would make this "switching of spectrum" seem like a waste of time! Remember, it's not about "easier" or "cheaper", it's about "what is the best spectrum I can deliver?"
 

T.H.Cammo

Well-Known Member
Or you could do:
-400w HPS with a 250w MH, but thats not quite 2:1
-800w HPS with a 400w MH
Oh yeah! There are lots of combinations. That's why I want to start small, get the right ratio, then scale up later. When it comes time to scale up, I already have a good 400 watt system that does either HPS or MH with a switable ballast and an air cooled hood.
 

flabbyone

Well-Known Member
One point I want to make about your calculations is that you are comparing wattage and not lumens. You are way better off with 2 of the 600 watt hps lights then with 3 of the 400 watt. You get more lumens per watt with the bigger bulb although you can put your light spread out more with the 400 watt so there is a give and take on both lights.

I would think your calculations may be more accurate if you compared lumens to lumens then what the bulb takes for power. The output is what is growing the plants, not the input of wattage although this gives another measurement to tell which bulbs take more power, it does not tell you which use that power in the best way. It is the output of the light rather then the input.
Flabs
 

T.H.Cammo

Well-Known Member
One point I want to make about your calculations is that you are comparing wattage and not lumens. You are way better off with 2 of the 600 watt hps lights then with 3 of the 400 watt. You get more lumens per watt with the bigger bulb although you can put your light spread out more with the 400 watt so there is a give and take on both lights.

I would think your calculations may be more accurate if you compared lumens to lumens then what the bulb takes for power. The output is what is growing the plants, not the input of wattage although this gives another measurement to tell which bulbs take more power, it does not tell you which use that power in the best way. It is the output of the light rather then the input.
Flabs
Thanks for responding! Yeah, I know all that, been there - done that (a few times!). The reason I'm speaking in terms of watts is because "watt for watt" or "size for size", most bulbs in the same catagory put out a very similar amount of lumens (especially the smaller ones, like I intend to start with).

As a matter of fact, some of the smaller bulbs don't even post lumen information on thier packageing. What a pain in the ass! So I figure, "all things being equal" - or at least close enough - as long as I'm just playing with little 70 watters it's more useful to go by the wattage and the old "HID Rule of Thumb: 50 watts per sq. ft."

So far I have 1 MH and 1 HPS security fixtures @ 70 watts each (lumens not specified by Cooper lighting). In the process of bypassing the "Photosensors" and "remoting" the ballasts.
 
Top