DEA Lawsuit (Minus the Trolls)

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force Mar. 23, 1976.
Article 18

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.





Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, G.A. res. 36/55, 36 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 171, U.N. Doc. A/36/684 (1981).
Article 1

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have a religion or whatever belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

Article 6

In accordance with article I of the present Declaration, and subject to the provisions of article 1, paragraph 3, the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief shall include, inter alia, the following freedoms:

(a) To worship or assemble in connection with a religion or belief, and to establish and maintain places for these purposes;

(b) To establish and maintain appropriate charitable or humanitarian institutions;

(c) To make, acquire and use to an adequate extent the necessary articles and materials related to the rites or customs of a religion or belief;

(d) To write, issue and disseminate relevant publications in these areas;

(e) To teach a religion or belief in places suitable for these purposes;

(f) To solicit and receive voluntary financial and other contributions from individuals and institutions;

(g) To train, appoint, elect or designate by succession appropriate leaders called for by the requirements and standards of any religion or belief;

(h) To observe days of rest and to celebrate holidays and ceremonies in accordance with the precepts of one's religion or belief;

(i) To establish and maintain communications with individuals and communities in matters of religion and belief at the national and international levels.
 

qwizoking

Well-Known Member
Ahhh
Well Good luck. I'll be rooting for you

Maybe one day I'll see your face in the paper (with a win)

I love the Austin American statesman btw

I'd definitely promote them on rollitup
One of my fav papers in the country certainly
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Ahhh
Well Good luck. I'll be rooting for you

Maybe one day I'll see your face in the paper (with a win)

I love the Austin American statesman btw

I'd definitely promote them on rollitup
One of my fav papers in the country certainly
The DEA case will be in the Austin American Statesman. The case is in the Federal Western District of Texas, in Austin.

This case is basically just a continuation of this case, with the added caveat that Religion needs exemption too:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/375/1148/559765/


And in these the DOJ has explained the DEA's fault, and the DEA has basically admitted fault in these:
https://www.justice.gov/atr/memorandum-antitrust-division-united-states-department-justice-amicus-curiae-support-application
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/rules/2016/fr0812_3.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/3052013829132756857467.pdf


And here is the Law on Publishing in papers:
15 U.S.C. § 16
(c) Publication of summaries in newspapersThe United States shall also cause to be published, commencing at least 60 days prior to the effective date of the judgment described in subsection (b) of this section, for 7 days over a period of 2 weeks in newspapers of general circulation of the district in which the case has been filed, in the District of Columbia, and in such other districts as the court may direct—
(i)
a summary of the terms of the proposal for consent judgment,
(ii)
a summary of the competitive impact statement filed under subsection (b),
(iii)
and a list of the materials and documents under subsection (b) which the United States shall make available for purposes of meaningful public comment, and the place where such materials and documents are available for public inspection.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also, SCOTUS has already made a pretty amazing ruling regarding Schedule I substances. So add this case to the case mentioned in my last post, and it's going to be an easy win. (My case has a lot more to it than that though)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/546/418/opinion.html
"Under the more focused inquiry required by RFRA and the compelling interest test, the Government’s mere invocation of the general characteristics of Schedule I substances, as set forth in the Controlled Substances Act, cannot carry the day. It is true, of course, that Schedule I substances such as DMT are exceptionally dangerous. See, e.g., Touby v. United States, 500 U. S. 160, 162 (1991). Nevertheless, there is no indication that Congress, in classifying DMT, considered the harms posed by the particular use at issue here—the circumscribed, sacramental use of hoasca by the UDV."
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also,

Freedom of Worship Clause (Texas Constitution, Article 1 Section 6)
Sec. 6. FREEDOM OF WORSHIP.
"All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences. No man shall be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent. No human authority ought, in any case whatever, to control or interfere with the rights of conscience in matters of religion, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious society or mode of worship. But it shall be the duty of the Legislature to pass such laws as may be necessary to protect equally every religious denomination in the peaceable enjoyment of its own mode of public worship."

18 U.S. Code § 247 - Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs
(a) Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section—
(1)
intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property, because of the religious character of that property, or attempts to do so; or
(2)
intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
all else said, i gotta admire your persistence.
Well they have persistently harassed me for my Religion since I was 14 years old, and even put me in jail. So they kind of instilled that persistence in me. If they hadn't been so adamant about not letting me practice my Religion, maybe I wouldn't be so adamant about making them stop what they are doing. Lol.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Well they have persistently harassed me for my Religion since I was 14 years old, and even put me in jail. So they kind of instilled that persistence in me. If they hadn't been so adamant about not letting me practice my Religion, maybe I wouldn't be so adamant about making them stop what they are doing. Lol.
They might have all the money but they're still wrong. Keep fighting the good fight. If you're ignored, it's one more justification for the argument that our goverment is unresponsive to its citizens and has therefore lost its legitimacy.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also, this will be part of the case. If the Court ever wants to check to make sure someone is practicing their Religion with historical accuracy (because sometimes the court doesn't know about all Religions) they will use the Encyclopedia of Religion.

Vol. 1
http://www.e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133762/Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._01_of_14_(AARON_-_ATTENTION).pdf

Vol. 2
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133768/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._02_of_14_(ATTRIBUTES_OF_GOD_-_BUTLER,_JOSEPH).pdf

Vol. 3
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133769/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._03_of_14_(CABASILAS,_NICHOLAS_-_CYRUS_II).pdf

Vol. 4
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133770/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._04_of_14_(DACIAN_RIDERS_-_ESTHER).pdf

Vol. 5
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133771/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._05_of_14_(ETERNITY_-_GOD).pdf

Vol. 6
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133758/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._06_of_14_(GODDESS_WORSHIP_-_ICONOCLASM).pdf

Vol. 7
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133759/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._07_of_14_(ICONOGRAPHY_-_JUSTIN_MARTYR).pdf

Vol. 8
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133760/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._08_of_14_(KA&#039_BAH_-_MARX,_KARL).pdf

Vol. 9
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133761/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._09_of_14_(MARY_-_NDEMBU_RELIGION).pdf

Vol. 10
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133763/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._10_of_14_(NECROMANCY_-_PINDAR).pdf

Vol. 11
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133764/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._11_of_14_(PIUS_IX_-_RIVERS).pdf

Vol. 12
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133765/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._12_of_14_(RNYING_MA_PA_SCHOOL_-_SOUL).pdf

Vol. 13
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133766/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._13_of_14_(SOUTH_AMERICAN_INDIAN_RELIGIONS_-_TRANSCENDENCE_AND--NENCE).pdf

Vol. 14
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133767/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion._vol._14_of_14_(TRANSCENDENTAL_MEDITATION_-_ZWINGLI,_HULDRYCH).pdf
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
They might have all the money but they're still wrong. Keep fighting the good fight. If you're ignored, it's one more justification for the argument that our goverment is unresponsive to its citizens and has therefore lost its legitimacy.
They can't ignore this one. I'm not just suing the Government, I am going directly for Chuck Rosenberg (Director of the DEA), Loretta Lynch (US Attorney General), Stepan Company and Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. So I'm going straight for the people responsible, and the companies they are protecting. And those companies aren't going to be very happy about all this.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And I am not making any claims that the DEA and the DOJ haven't already made themselves. I am just pointing out a problem that they are still not resolving, even with all their lofty ideas and promising statements.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Here are just a few of the statements where the DOJ and DEA have openly said the same things I am saying, they just aren't realizing that if they are going to do these things, they also need to open the door for Religion.

Here is a statement from the DOJ telling the DEA to stop the Monopolies they have
https://www.justice.gov/atr/memorandum-antitrust-division-united-states-department-justice-amicus-curiae-support-application

Here is a statement from the DEA saying that they are going to end the Marijuana research Monopoly (2 months ago)
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/rules/2016/fr0812_3.pdf

This is a statement from the DOJ basically saying that Marijuana should be legal in states that legalize it and in Native American tribes that legalize it.
https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/3052013829132756857467.pdf
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And here is what I am asking for in the Lawsuit

Whereby the Plaintiff Prays the Court, terminate the Illegal Monopoly, Overturn any laws being used Unconstitutionally (Primarily the Controlled Substances Act), Yick Wo v. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356 (1886), Leary v. United States 395 U.S. 6 (1969), Release any Class Member who is currently illegally jailed, award all Class Members damaged by the Monopoly’s operations or subsequent arrests a sum of at least $10,000 each (or equal to damage) for damages, at least $1,000,000 each for resulting deaths, and $50,000 to $200,000 each for illegal arrests (for their time and damage to their lives and reputation), as well as release Religious Captives from the Class and award each of them $50,000 to $200,000 (for their time and damage to their lives and reputation), and give an award of at least $5,000 to all Class Members who have been in fear of their Freedom/Safety for Practicing their Religion or of being Harmed/Arrested by the Operations of the Monopoly.

28 U.S. Code Chapter 171 -Tort

42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Rights Violated

28 U.S. Code § 1332 -Class Action

28 U.S. Code § 1714 -Class Rights

42 U.S. Code § 1988 -Vindication of Rights


And order the Media to report on the Judgement, as per the following Statute

§ 5 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16 (Tunney Act)

(c) Publication of summaries in newspapers

The United States shall also cause to be published, commencing at least 60 days prior to the effective date of the judgment described in subsection (b) of this section, for 7 days over a period of 2 weeks in newspapers of general circulation of the district in which the case has been filed, in the District of Columbia, and in such other districts as the court may direct--

i. a summary of the terms of the proposal for the consent judgment, ii. a summary of the competitive impact statement filed under subsection (b) of this section, iii. and a list of the materials and documents under subsection (b) of this section which the United States shall make available for purposes of meaningful public comment, and the place where such materials and documents are available for public inspection.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also, the reason they started all of this is because I lived in a $1.3 Million house (in Texas, so it was a big house), so they thought that they were going to get a huge bust when they came in with no warrant.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
No warrant? I do hope you sued them over that too?
I think it's too late for that. The case ended August 2015 and it happened in 2010, but maybe I can. I was more focused on the Religious stuff, but I'll check right now to see how long after the case I can bring the suit.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
I just checked and it's way too late to sue them for coming in with no warrant. But I am suing the Austin PD, the DEA and soon the Army and maybe the NSA. So I have plenty to do.
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
I just checked and it's way too late to sue them for coming in with no warrant. But I am suing the Austin PD, the DEA and soon the Army and maybe the NSA. So I have plenty to do.
If you were a lawyer, you would be sued for malpractice. Blowing a statute of limitations is negligence. That's the easiest part of everything you're doing.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
If you were a lawyer, you would be sued for malpractice. Blowing a statute of limitations is negligence. That's the easiest part of everything you're doing.
Lol.
Every time someone tells me I should be a lawyer I tell them that I am already a minister and that is all I want to be. So, the fact that I didn't even try to move forward with a 4th amendment lawsuit because I was focusing on two 1st amendment Free Exercise Lawsuit hardly proves anything.

And the statute of limitation was up while I was in another State for 6 years studying the law, so it's not even really relevant, as I hadn't spent 6 years studying the law at that time.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Lol.
Every time someone tells me I should be a lawyer I tell them that I am already a minister and that is all I want to be. So, the fact that I didn't even try to move forward with a 4th amendment lawsuit because I was focusing on two 1st amendment Free Exercise Lawsuit hardly proves anything.

And the statute of limitation was up while I was in another State for 6 years studying the law, so it's not even really relevant, as I hadn't spent 6 years studying the law at that time.
You haven't passed the bar, but that doesn't mean you can't practice good law.

Everyone is a critic, especially those who aren't doing it for themselves.

You keep it up, reverend.
 
Top