Critical + & ReCon Monster Cola's

Did not keep a journal on this harvest. Middle of a move, hetic, blah, blah, blah...

Raised these from germination. About a 6 week veg, 8 week flower. Hydro, H & G nutrients, Co2, best of everything.

Experienced several monster cola's, from 14" to 18", the top dawg weighing in at 8.2 ounces (just harvested).

Those are some gorgeous nugs. Kudos

This is Critical+ correct? I just popped a few from seed...

In your experience, does it flower better topped or untopped?

Also, what's your lighting setup?

Sorry for all the questions, but I want some nugs like that...

I'm running two 1000 watt in an 8' x 8' tent. 12 plants total. Critical + and the ReCon raised from seeds Cloned now and a mother of each.

Did not top. My partner cycled two on the indentical ReCons, same batch of seeds at about the same time. Unlike my set-up, he does not have climate control or use Co2. My yield was 4 times bigger.

The ReCon came back testing at 21.8 % THC. Heavy hitter. The Critical + is a pure Indica strain. Some people report hits hard, while others report energetic, etc. I am a firm believer that different strains effect people differently, depending on many factors. That's why I provide my patients with free samples of each harvest and let them choose which strain is right for them.

Got me G 13 Haze and Green Crack girls going into flower tomorrow. Maybe I'll fid time one of these rounds to keep a proper journal.

n00bster said:

Those are some gorgeous nugs. Kudos

This is Critical+ correct? I just popped a few from seed...

In your experience, does it flower better topped or untopped?

Also, what's your lighting setup?

Sorry for all the questions, but I want some nugs like that...

Click to expand...

Damn do you think the CO2 augmentation played the biggest role in the difference? Do you run it at 1500 ppm?

And what brand nutes do you run? I'm not familiar with H & G.

Thanks for the input.

Absolutely the Co2 is a game changer as far as net yield. 1500 ppm.

House & Garden nutrients. I have tried almost all the brands on the market, House & Gardens is hands down the best for hydroponics.

n00bster said:

Damn do you think the CO2 augmentation played the biggest role in the difference? Do you run it at 1500 ppm?

And what brand nutes do you run? I'm not familiar with H & G.

Thanks for the input.

Click to expand...

KoonDawg said:

I'm running two 1000 watt in an 8' x 8' tent. 12 plants total. Critical + and the ReCon raised from seeds Cloned now and a mother of each.

Did not top. My partner cycled two on the indentical ReCons, same batch of seeds at about the same time. Unlike my set-up, he does not have climate control or use Co2. My yield was 4 times bigger.

The ReCon came back testing at 21.8 % THC. Heavy hitter. The Critical + is a pure Indica strain. Some people report hits hard, while others report energetic, etc. I am a firm believer that different strains effect people differently, depending on many factors. That's why I provide my patients with free samples of each harvest and let them choose which strain is right for them.

Got me G 13 Haze and Green Crack girls going into flower tomorrow. Maybe I'll fid time one of these rounds to keep a proper journal.

Click to expand...

Critical + from Dinafem is actually Sativa dominant. I got some outside right now, once you clone em you can really see the sativa side to them. I love Dinafem, I don't know if any breeder could be "better", maybe just as good... but not better...

... for yield that is. Wow, I was in love with their yields at the time.