Cinderella 99 vs sugar punch?

By the reviews I have read on these two yet never smoking or growing neither, they both seem to be holy grail strains. Both big yielders, fast and very psychoactive.

In your opinion which of these two strains perform the best in stability and potency. What are the major differences to note in the highs? Which will f#ck me up in the head more and has better bag appeal?

I'd like to know as I will be ordering one of the two and if I get good enough reports on both I'll order both and do a mix grow with half c99 and half sugar punch.

Oh and as far as sannies goes, would sugar punch be his most potent sativa up to date? I've only tried kolossus and killing fields and we're pleased with both but neither gave me that mind wreck speed rolling high.

I've never grown or smoked sugar punch but C99 is very nice and does finish fast. Great flavor and very nice resin glands. Def has a nice bag appeal that's for sure but not sure it will give you a mind wreck high.

Does Sannie offer C99 now or were you planning to source it from elsewhere?

psychadelibud said:

Oh and as far as sannies goes, would sugar punch be his most potent sativa up to date? I've only tried kolossus and killing fields and we're pleased with both but neither gave me that mind wreck speed rolling high.

Click to expand...

sugarpunch is a good strain..
I did a run with it, it's a finicky plant, at least mine were, almost irreversible as far as if it starts to flower, mine continued on flowering under 24 hours of light, for over a month.
Sorta not the heartiest of strains, but again, maybe I had bad luck.
BUT it is some damn good smoke though, medium yielder.
Out of sannies seeds that he has on the site, i'd go with the madberry over the sugarpunch.. but if you can get them both, I would do that.
Madberry is a helluva strain though.
if you are looking for potent sativas maybe check out the des star and it's crosses. Looks like a nice sativa

psychadelibud said:

By the reviews I have read on these two yet never smoking or growing neither, they both seem to be holy grail strains. Both big yielders, fast and very psychoactive.

In your opinion which of these two strains perform the best in stability and potency. What are the major differences to note in the highs? Which will f#ck me up in the head more and has better bag appeal?

I'd like to know as I will be ordering one of the two and if I get good enough reports on both I'll order both and do a mix grow with half c99 and half sugar punch.

Click to expand...

I've grown a handful of each. From what I've seen I prefer the C-99. I grew Female Seeds version, and it's very stable. No need to run a bunch, whereas the Sugar Punch you might need to run a pack or two to find something you really like.

I would say that the ceiling is higher for Sugar Punch though based on the reviews I've read. The C-99 is very nice, but not exceptional IMO. Sugar Punch might land you something exceptional, but you'll likely have to dig for it.

st0wandgrow said:

I've grown a handful of each. From what I've seen I prefer the C-99. I grew Female Seeds version, and it's very stable. No need to run a bunch, whereas the Sugar Punch you might need to run a pack or two to find something you really like.

I would say that the ceiling is higher for Sugar Punch though based on the reviews I've read. The C-99 is very nice, but not exceptional IMO. Sugar Punch might land you something exceptional, but you'll likely have to dig for it.

Click to expand...

good points.
The sugarpunch is sorta like some dj short or subcool strains...
finicky, PITA, and you may have to look for the special keeper...
But if you find it...