Chakra Energies

alaskachic

Well-Known Member
Oh my goodness let it go man! Onto the next episode
Get off that merry go round lol
Jeeezzz
Your the type of man who chases around the house when the other is trying to get away from the argument.
I can tell you that much.
I hope your beloved "science" gets you a good seat @ the table in the afterlife.
Don't look now, but are You Wearing Your Soul On Your Face?
 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
Hi Vegas so no science cannot explain everything. What never no way!
All the best human experience cannot be separated by a subterfuge.or measured in a beakerbut in my most humble opinion one can go under the microscope to examine the inner self.
Science can't really explain:
Compassion
Truth
Faith
Understanding
Empathy (my fav)
Those of us that have should share; be an example for others to gain it.
We all (I believe) have a much higher calling then what we know today. And the wise learn everyday & apply it tomorrow.
Nevertheless we think a lot alike in some ways
So Pow Pow Pow Pow I'm a straight shooter here so........,...
I Bow to the Divine within you dear heart!
I don't mind going toe to toe but....
I no like
VERBAL CHASING!
Namaste dear friend.
I said science will explain everything in time. You used a double negative so I do not understand your statement. watch the video, 3 minutes long, I posted that is the science behind emotions. peace
namaste
 

alaskachic

Well-Known Member
sorry man i just now am able to load entire vid.post: 12526674 said:
I said science will explain everything in time. You used a double negative so I do not understand your statement. watch the video, 3 minutes long, I posted that is the science behind emotions. peace
namaste
Sorry man i
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I do believe that I have mastered my chi, by mastering Zen, yes I know they are different philosophies Zen has nothing to do with the chi but by quieting my mind I was able to become directly aware of my chi as it is in the body and affecting the mind, I was able to gain control of my chi by surrendering resistance to it, and like a spinning wheel that no longer has force acting upon it eventually both my negative and positive emotions lost momentum and became still. I am a paranoid schizophrenic and trust me it was a matter of survival for this to happen. I respect your opinions heisenberg, do you believe that the chi exists or no? I wanta start a debate damn it the philosophy thread is dead.
Can you tell me how I can identify chi energy and separate it from non-chi energy? Assume my spiritual sensitivity is zero. Ideally I would like to use a mechanical sensor so that i may be objective and quantitative. After all, ALL energy is a quantity. What sort of mechanism qualifies?
 

HeatlessBBQ

Well-Known Member
Can you tell me how I can identify chi energy and separate it from non-chi energy? Assume my spiritual sensitivity is zero. Ideally I would like to use a mechanical sensor so that i may be objective and quantitative. After all, ALL energy is a quantity. What sort of mechanism qualifies?
What ?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I am asking how I can test whether an energy is chi or non-chi.

For that I need dimensions (ideally a conversion to joules, the classic measure of any and all energy) and some sort of instrument to detect and measure it. If it cannot be measured the term "energy" may not correctly be used.

If you are using "energy" in a subjective sense, please pardon my intrusion. Even so, if you can help me understand and describe the characteristics of chi, I might learn something. I am operating from my own article of faith: that the physics of spirit are real but we aren't there yet. But scientists are beginning to instrument the "paranormal" and beginning to learn stuff. That enthralls me. It offers a way out of religion and into the next step of being conscious. I hope.

~edit~ I must ask. Did Solve really eat Caligula?
 
Last edited:

HeatlessBBQ

Well-Known Member
I am asking how I can test whether an energy is chi or non-chi.

For that I need dimensions (ideally a conversion to joules, the classic measure of any and all energy) and some sort of instrument to detect and measure it. If it cannot be measured the term "energy" may not correctly be used.

If you are using "energy" in a subjective sense, please pardon my intrusion. Even so, if you can help me understand and describe the characteristics of chi, I might learn something. I am operating from my own article of faith: that the physics of spirit are real but we aren't there yet. But scientists are beginning to instrument the "paranormal" and beginning to learn stuff. That enthralls me. It offers a way out of religion and into the next step of being conscious. I hope.

~edit~ I must ask. Did Solve really eat Caligula?
My apologies but I cannot answer Your first question due to it's deep scientific basis.... I dont follow.

However I can explain chi . . . Chi, Prana, ENERGY . . . It is all relative.
I would research chakra energies if I were You to further explain the universal energy that resides within Us all....

One could say that DMT is chi.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
My apologies but I cannot answer Your first question due to it's deep scientific basis.... I dont follow.

However I can explain chi . . . Chi, Prana, ENERGY . . . It is all relative.
I would research chakra energies if I were You to further explain the universal energy that resides within Us all....

One could say that DMT is chi.
I would love to research chakra energy but it is my way to seek the objective parts first. I have a scientific bias; to that I admit. I am very partial to a branch of human endeavor whose core maxim is "Don't take my word for it. Test the hypothesis with serious intent of falsifying it, and with objective means other workers in the field could reproduce. If the hypothesis survives, you get to keep going."

Contrast with the humanities and our lore of experience with spirit/spirits. many of those accounts are beautiful, which arouses in me a believer's bias. That attitude is the immediate death of rational inquiry. If it is purely subjective, I won't trust my findings. I am astonished at my mind's capacity to lie to itself. That is why i am focusing on nonaware sensors. It lessens the "observer effect" and "observer bias" cognition traps into which I so easily fall.

That said, I do not doubt that chakra energy exists. I believe physics will catch up, to the gain of both science and philosophy.

~edit~ I have taken DMT. It has aroused some fantastic ideation on my part but nothing that I can identify as "wisdom from outside myself". I find my experience to be purely subjective and thus beyond proper test.
 
Last edited:

HeatlessBBQ

Well-Known Member
I would love to research chakra energy but it is my way to seek the objective parts first. I have a scientific bias; to that I admit. I am very partial to a branch of human endeavor whose core maxim is "Don't take my word for it. Test the hypothesis with serious intent of falsifying it, and with objective means other workers in the field could reproduce. If the hypothesis survives, you get to keep going."

Contrast with the humanities and our lore of experience with spirit/spirits. many of those accounts are beautiful, which arouses in me a believer's bias. That attitude is the immediate death of rational inquiry. If it is purely subjective, I won't trust my findings. I am astonished at my mind's capacity to lie to itself. That is why i am focusing on nonaware sensors. It lessens the "observer effect" and "observer bias" cognition traps into which I so easily fall.

That said, I do not doubt that chakra energy exists. I believe physics will catch up, to the gain of both science and philosophy.

~edit~ I have taken DMT. It has aroused some fantastic ideation on my part but nothing that I can identify as "wisdom from outside myself". I find my experience to be purely subjective and thus beyond proper test.
Have You been doing any research or learning on chakras, @Canna????
 
Top