Balls to the Wall grow, Riddleme Gets Serious

riddleme

Well-Known Member
I need to start out by explaining how I got the idea for this experiment in the first place. Back in the day (before HID) we used flouros and incandesents to grow, I know this does not jive with what we all say today but that was what we had, the flouros were for spectrum and the incandesents were for heat (cause the flouros did not put off any heat). Now back then I could not of explained the why of it, it was what the published books said back then, so we did it, and it worked.

Having this experience and now constantly reading the tidbits of info here, I keep seeing that to adjust your light you should use your hand to gauge the heat and that 1000 watters grow tighter nugs than 400 watters. Pretty much everyone says this, since I have no such experience, I am pretty much taking thier word for it???

Now, I gotta tell ya that I do not for one second believe that it is the spectrum or the lumens that cause this, The spectrum of most HPS lights sucks IMO as far as plants are concerned and the plant can only process so much light. In my mind, with my way of thinking, I had the idea that what actually made the difference was the heat that the bigger bulbs produce. It was kinda like one of those AhHa moments that make you say Huuummmm?

This and the fact that plants do better in sunlight where I have already shown does not cram lumens up the plants ass. We all know that the sun puts off HEAT and that it is from the far infrared spectrum, so off I went to see if I could find anything to explain my new notion?

I googled the term "infrared plants" now most of what came up was about photography and taking infrared pictures, some of that was interesting but did not really apply too much other than it showed how plants store/collect heat and then give it back off once the sun goes down.

The second most common info that came up was how modern day greenhouses use infrared heat so that they can grow year round, there was also a site that talked about greenhouses using infrared filters (to block it) to keep the plants from getting bigger, this allowed them to harden off more for resale in a given area. This was an interesting tidbit of info as it points out that infrared heat/light has something to do with growth?

Then I found an Ask Ed article from 2005 that was MJ specific and explained exactly what I was starting to see, here is the quote,,,,

Infrared light


By Ed Rosenthal - Monday, November 7 2005 Tags:
Can my plants detect infrared light?
I want to use an infrared camera to keep tabs on my grow room during the dark phase. How does the camera work? Is infrared within the spectrum that the plant can see?
Porcelli Giovanni,
Internet
The electromagnetic spectrum is categorized by wavelength. The longer the wave, the less energy it holds. So blue light, which has a short wavelength of 475 nanometers, has more energy than red light, which has a wavelength of 660 nm. Infrared light is just beyond the range of human vision at 730nm. Although we cannot see it, we can feel infrared radiation as warmth. For instance, a glowing charcoal emits red light in the visible spectrum and infrared light that we sense as heat.
Every object emits infrared radiation from its surface. So an object with a cold surface emits less and an object with a warm surface emits more. That's how an infrared camera works. It records a photo of the infrared rays emitted by the objects in the picture. Plants are usually a little warmer than the surrounding environment, so they are lighter. Water and moist objects such as soil are often cooler and darker. Even a totally dark room yields an infrared picture.
Since the camera is only recording waves that are already there and is not projecting any light into the space, it has no effect on the plants. If you take an infrared photo outside your space, you can see how much heat is escaping and how it's leaving. You might find that of interest also.


The plants use red and infrared light to regulate stem growth and flowering response. Plant cells produce a chemical called a phytochrome, which has two versions. One version, PR, is sensitive to red light (660 nm). Red light converts PR into PFR. PFR signals the plant to grow short stocky stems and also helps the plant grow into specific shapes. The plants also use red and infrared light to measure uninterrupted darkness. As far as plants are concerned in terms of flowering, if there's no red light, it's dark.
PFR is sensitive to infrared light (730 nm), which converts it into PR. When PR levels build to a critical amount, scientists hypothesize that a hormone called floragen becomes active and induces the plant to flower. The reason floragen is called hypothetical is that researchers can see its effects, but they haven't found it yet.
PFR reverts to PR naturally. For PFR to be present, it must be renewed continuously by the presence of red light. When plants are shaded, they get less of the needed red light. In the absence of red light, the PR version predominates and the stem stretches to reach the light. Lower side branches shaded by leaves
from above have PR and grow longer until they reach the light. Then they modify their growth in the presence of PFR.
Outdoors during the day, there is more red light than infrared. However, at dawn and dusk the first and last light from the sun isn't the visible red of the rising or setting sun, but infrared, which is at the far end of the electromagnetic spectrum. The infrared converts the PFR to PR and the critical dark-time begins or ends its countdown.
This has too many implications for them all to be discussed here. For instance, it explains why plants grown under incandescent lamps stretch (more infrared than red light). The effects of the two spectrums can also be used in innovative indoor lighting programs.

Readers with grow questions (or answers) should send them to Ed at: Ask Ed, PMB 147, 530 Divisadero St., San Francisco, California 94117, USA
You can also email Ed at [email protected], and send queries via his websites at www.ask-ed.net.
All featured questions will be rewarded with a copy of Ed's new book, Best of Ask Ed: Your Marijuana Questions Answered. Sorry, Ed cannot send personal replies to your questions.
I have bolded the part that made me decide to do this. So in an effort to re-create the sun in my basement and add infrared heat/light to my garden I installed the Presto heat dish and made it temp controlled with it aimed at what will be my canopy and the thermostat on the opposite wall. This will allow me to adjust the light for proper lumens (intensity) at the canopy and still have the effects of heat.

I will be putting it on a timer so that the heater comes on 15 minutes before the lights and shuts off 15 minutes after lights out. As this is what plants see under the sun. My CMH bulb has plenty of red spectrum so not expecting to see out of control stretching like you would with incandesents, though there may be some?

And we will see what happens? If I am correct this will very much change the way we grow indoors :hump::shock::hump:
 

JN811

Well-Known Member
looking great dude! You know im Sub'd! sorry man, ive been really busy lately.. this is the first time ive been on in a while.. I actually have to go now, but Ill def. be checking in.. and catch up soon!
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
So in an effort to re-create the sun in my basement and add infrared heat/light to my garden I installed the Presto heat dish and made it temp controlled with it aimed at what will be my canopy and the thermostat on the opposite wall. This will allow me to adjust the light for proper lumens (intensity) at the canopy and still have the effects of heat.

I will be putting it on a timer so that the heater comes on 15 minutes before the lights and shuts off 15 minutes after lights out. As this is what plants see under the sun. My CMH bulb has plenty of red spectrum so not expecting to see out of control stretching like you would with incandesents, though there may be some?

And we will see what happens? If I am correct this will very much change the way we grow indoors :hump::shock::hump:
This will be interesting. Not sure many plants in nature experience the infrared before visible light as sun is on the horizon at the time, infrared is largely line-of-sight and there is not enough time for much heating of the atmosphere to occur before the sun comes over the horizon and you have direct visible light. But most outdoor plants would experience some time each day with a higher percentage of infrared than at mid day due to the differential absorption of shorter wavelengths by the atmosphere - so it would be the equivalent of your starting the heat lamp for the first fifteen minutes the lights are on. Something to think about.
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
This will be interesting. Not sure many plants in nature experience the infrared before visible light as sun is on the horizon at the time, infrared is largely line-of-sight and there is not enough time for much heating of the atmosphere to occur before the sun comes over the horizon and you have direct visible light. But most outdoor plants would experience some time each day with a higher percentage of infrared than at mid day due to the differential absorption of shorter wavelengths by the atmosphere - so it would be the equivalent of your starting the heat lamp for the first fifteen minutes the lights are on. Something to think about.
Just going by what Ed said in the article, plus there was another site/link that said the same thing

Outdoors during the day, there is more red light than infrared. However, at dawn and dusk the first and last light from the sun isn't the visible red of the rising or setting sun, but infrared, which is at the far end of the electromagnetic spectrum. The infrared converts the PFR to PR and the critical dark-time begins or ends its countdown.
It may well be that I adjust things as it gets going and we see the response to it???
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Got my new clone station set up, that is a 18 inch, 15 watt T8

and the other pic shows how I set up the heatdish, red circle on the left

the red on the right is the thermostat, you can see I have the heatdish aimed directly thru the canopy at the thermostat, this so I have complete control over the temp output
 

Attachments

desertrat

Well-Known Member
Just going by what Ed said in the article, plus there was another site/link that said the same thing



It may well be that I adjust things as it gets going and we see the response to it???
it's definitely worth trying just pointing out that in nature the plant probably gets visible and infrared radiation at about the same time with maybe a little atmospheric warming before either light.
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Since the babies are not getting rain yet, I thought I would share a mater update, I made it rain on them again this morning. pics were just 7 days apart from each other the one I took to show you earlier what relaxed looks like the other one taken today, I tried to get the same angle (it's close) lots of new growth in just 7 days :hump:
 

Attachments

DaveCoulier

Well-Known Member
Riddleme that text from Ed doesn't seem quite right. I have never read infrared light having involvement when it comes to Phytochromes, Pr/Pfr, etc. Its always been Red, and Far-Red light. Far-red light peaks at 730nm. After that its Infra-red.

When you talked about greenhouses blocking out infrared light. Are you sure it wasn't talking about far-red? If you can block out the far-red, the Red/Far-Red ratio goes up, and you will end up with plants that are shorter, and bushier.
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Riddleme that text from Ed doesn't seem quite right. I have never read infrared light having involvement when it comes to Phytochromes, Pr/Pfr, etc. Its always been Red, and Far-Red light. Far-red light peaks at 730nm. After that its Infra-red.

When you talked about greenhouses blocking out infrared light. Are you sure it wasn't talking about far-red? If you can block out the far-red, the Red/Far-Red ratio goes up, and you will end up with plants that are shorter, and bushier.
looks like I'll be doing some more research to try and verify, does not change my theory on heat though
 

DaveCoulier

Well-Known Member
looks like I'll be doing some more research to try and verify, does not change my theory on heat though
Id ask my buddy what his thoughts are on infra-red affecting plants, but he's too busy with school. He has access to multiple databases of scholarly journals, experiments etc.

When I did a google search for infra-red and plant stretching, almost all the hits that came back are from marijuana forums. Odd.

Ill be digging around as well.
 

Tarkfu

Member
Id ask my buddy what his thoughts are on infra-red affecting plants, but he's too busy with school. He has access to multiple databases of scholarly journals, experiments etc.

When I did a google search for infra-red and plant stretching, almost all the hits that came back are from marijuana forums. Odd.

Ill be digging around as well.
That's because marijuana growers are the best horticulturalists of this generation. Definitely an interesting experiment though. I started my grow around the same time, so Ill be seeing the difference between your grow and my crappy dresser grow on a parallel timeline. Will allow me to better make adjustments for my next goround I think.
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
quick update, 2 of them are now in pots

same thing happened to #2 as far as developing trichs

the 2 I put down yesterday are showing thier little heads so should pop soon

and the runt is still trying, so will continue to let it go
 

Danielsgb

Well-Known Member
I saw this a week or two ago from Stealthy's cabinet journal. I had bought my bulb after you mentioned a new experiment and Infrared. This talks about the UV-B and resin production. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120019839/abstract
My canopy is 12" to 16" and I think it's too close. The MH or HPS didn't cause the bleached tip look. I'll get better pics in the morning. A leaf looks mutated.:cool: Kinda like 3 grew together. It seems cooler than the MH, and if it's cooler than the HPS, it's not by much. I think it would give you a sunburn given a bit too long.
Daniels:weed:
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
I saw this a week or two ago from Stealthy's cabinet journal. I had bought my bulb after you mentioned a new experiment and Infrared. This talks about the UV-B and resin production. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120019839/abstract
My canopy is 12" to 16" and I think it's too close. The MH or HPS didn't cause the bleached tip look. I'll get better pics in the morning. A leaf looks mutated.:cool: Kinda like 3 grew together. It seems cooler than the MH, and if it's cooler than the HPS, it's not by much. I think it would give you a sunburn given a bit too long.
Daniels:weed:
I have read that yes it can give you a sunburn and it can harm your eyes if you look too long at it
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Id ask my buddy what his thoughts are on infra-red affecting plants, but he's too busy with school. He has access to multiple databases of scholarly journals, experiments etc.

When I did a google search for infra-red and plant stretching, almost all the hits that came back are from marijuana forums. Odd.

Ill be digging around as well.
everything I'm finding indicates that far red and infrared are the same thing?

here is a quote from dictionary

(fär'rĕd')
n.
Electromagnetic radiation having the longest wavelengths in the infrared region, between approximately 50 and 1,000 micrometers. Also called far-infrared radiation.
and a pic of the entire spectrum (note the little blue green yellow red in the middle, that is where we normally play)

but infrared happens right after red and before microwaves

and here is a book link that backs up what ed was saying detailing a couple of studies that were done
http://books.google.com/books?id=lvss7MQ4pOsC&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=infrared+light+and+plants&source=bl&ots=bc12Jl-mH0&sig=KuZn3J3ZjfKe4br9v-Zq3R2p1Ng&hl=en&ei=aA3BS7mlLKKCnwfCxqyBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBjgU#v=onepage&q=infrared%20light%20and%20plants&f=false

here is a great explanation of what infrared heat is and how it benefits humans (I'm sure plants get similar benefits)
http://www.cronicfatiguerelief.com/why/what-is-infrared.html
 

Attachments

riddleme

Well-Known Member
Babies got thier first dark period last night of 8 hours, yes starting them off on a 16/8 will work up to 18/6 and then back down to 12/12 in small increments, noticed very minor growth and no stretching

also got a bit of the infrared heat as I was testing a plate I installed to cover the thermal protector as tipping it increased the heat to it and caused it to trip early, did not want to bypass it for safety's sake so I added a plate over it to reduce the heat it sees and that seems to be working great in the first test run
 

gumball

Well-Known Member
I have read that yes it can give you a sunburn and it can harm your eyes if you look too long at it
could it make you sick if exposed to long? I had it running for less than 10 minutes letting it warm up in the living room with the wife and I. well the next morning we both woke with headaches, and stomach aches. had to even vomit to clear it up. i havent experienced again, but was curious if the light could do that.
 

riddleme

Well-Known Member
could it make you sick if exposed to long? I had it running for less than 10 minutes letting it warm up in the living room with the wife and I. well the next morning we both woke with headaches, and stomach aches. had to even vomit to clear it up. i havent experienced again, but was curious if the light could do that.
never read/heard of anything like that and would not think 10 minutes would be enough exsposure to cause harm, I have spent as much as a half hour near it while puttering and have had no ill effects
 

Danielsgb

Well-Known Member
never read/heard of anything like that and would not think 10 minutes would be enough exsposure to cause harm, I have spent as much as a half hour near it while puttering and have had no ill effects
10 to 15 minutes, and I kinda felt odd. Hard to describe. Wasn't any more baked than normal.
 

gumball

Well-Known Member
never read/heard of anything like that and would not think 10 minutes would be enough exsposure to cause harm, I have spent as much as a half hour near it while puttering and have had no ill effects
10 to 15 minutes, and I kinda felt odd. Hard to describe. Wasn't any more baked than normal.
i really dont think it was the light, but it was new and we never experienced it before. we also ate the same dinner and both had some blueberries and apple juice together later, so it was either something bad, or a bug going around. i was just curious for other opinions. i am glad my case blocks it from my vision when looking at my plants though.
 
Top