Articles of Interest...

CrackerJax

New Member
Obama Has Accomplished Nothing On the World Stage

by Heritage Foundation
,

It is a monumental task trying to come up with any concrete foreign policy successes from the Obama administration.

Reuters

No American president has spent more time abroad in his first year in office than Barack Obama. His trip to Asia this week is his 8th foreign tour, taking the total number of countries visited to 20.
But what does the president have to show for all his gallivanting across the world stage and countless apologies for America’s past? Almost nothing, except for adoring crowds in exotic locales, and bemused monarchs surprised by groveling bows from the most powerful leader on the face of the earth.
It is a monumental task trying to come up with any concrete foreign policy successes from the Obama administration. On the Iranian nuclear crisis, arguably the biggest threat to international security of the Obama presidency, the administration’s high-risk strategy of engagement with the mullahs of Tehran has only emboldened America’s enemies and renewed their determination to press ahead with their nuclear weapons program.
On Afghanistan, the White House’s spectacular dithering on whether to send more troops is seriously damaging America’s standing as a world power, and undercutting the fight against the Taliban. As for the global War on Terror, it no longer even exists in the eyes of the White House. It has been replaced by the “Overseas Contingency Operation,” the sort of name typically given to a glorified U.N. peacekeeping operation.
As for America’s traditional alliances, especially the transatlantic alliance, they have taken a serious beating under the Obama administration. It is hard to think of a president who has shown less interest in the security of Europe than Barack Obama, as was shown by his government’s recent callous disregard for key allies in eastern and central Europe.
The humiliating surrender to Moscow’s demands over scrapping Third Site missile defense, and the decision to throw Poland and the Czech Republic under the bus in the face of Russian intimidation, will dramatically erode faith in the United States across the Atlantic for a generation. In a further snub to Europe, the president couldn’t even be bothered to attend the ceremonies marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall --one of the greatest events in the history of the past century.
Before he took office, the president boasted of “restoring” America’s “standing” in the world. He has succeeded so far only in weakening America’s defenses, eroding Washington’s alliances, and embarrassing the United States with a series of diplomatic gaffes and humiliating mea culpas.
The Obama administration has also embarked on a staggeringly naive appeasement strategy towards some of the most brutal and dangerous regimes on the face of the earth, from Tehran and Caracas to Khartoum and Rangoon. It is an approach doomed to failure, a disastrous roadmap for American decline.
The world needs powerful U.S. leadership in the face of an array of deadly threats, from the Al Qaeda network to state sponsors of international terror. Sadly, all it is getting at present are mealy-mouthed platitudes, 71-car motorcades and endless acts of contrition.
Nile Gardiner is the Director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage Foundation.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Obama Embarrasses Us All



This is humiliating:
Obama in China: A wake-up call!
By David Gergen, AC360

Barack Obama has recently been reading up on the presidency of John F. Kennedy. Coming home from China, he might well focus on Kennedy’s first summit overseas with the leader of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev. Indeed, we all could learn from that episode.

According to Kennedy biographer Richard Reeves, Khruschev left the meeting telling associates, “He’s very young… not strong enough. Too intelligent and too weak.” Khrushchev concluded that he could push Kennedy around and started causing mischief from Berlin to Cuba.

Why bring up that story now, as President Obama comes home from Asia? Because it has considerable relevance to his meetings in China with President Hu.

Obama went into those sessions like Kennedy: with great hope that his charm and appeal to reason – qualities so admired in the United States – would work well with Hu. By numerous accounts, that is not at all what happened: reports from correspondents on the scene are replete with statements that Hu stiffed the President, that he rejected arguments about Chinese human rights and currency behavior while scolding the U.S. for its trade policies, and that he stage-managed the visit so that Obama – unlike Clinton and Bush before him – was unable to reach a large Chinese audience through television.

It would seem wise not only for President Obama but for all Americans to treat this as a wake-up call.

For the President, the challenge is whether he will start approaching international affairs with a greater measure of toughness, standing up more firmly and assertively for American interests. Yes, he must still be the man of reason and peace, but that can easily be read as a sign of weakness by others unless he balances it with the inner steel that is essential in international affairs.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Well, this is what it's come down to after one year of apologizing and running the USA down globally to anyone that would listen (they did listen, they took notes even).

This is getting beyond embarrassing ... it's becoming dangerous.

=================================================================
Nuclear Diplomacy: President Obama has sent a "personal" letter to North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, hoping to coax him back to the table to talk about cutting his nation's nuclear program. Good luck with that.
Repeated U.S. entreaties to the hermit state to cut its nuclear arsenal have availed us nothing. Just this month, U.S. envoy Stephen Bosworth traveled to North Korea with a bunch of new diplomatic carrots for the regime.
The result? Bosworth put it this way, in classic diplomatese: "We identified some common understanding on the need for and a role of six-party talks and the importance of implementation of the 2005 joint statement (to dismantle the North's nuclear weapons)."
In short, he got nothing. But he did deliver Obama's personal letter to Kim.
Even the Washington Post called the letter "relatively unusual" for an American president. But it's not entirely without precedent. Both President Clinton and President Bush sent Kim personal letters, but only after extensive diplomatic efforts had failed.
At some point, it might start to dawn on those in the White House who run our national security apparatus that personal blandishments don't work with Kim.
The fact is, Kim, while cunning in his pursuit of self-preservation, is a sociopath, a mass murderer of his own people, responsible for the death by famine and torture of as many as 3 million North Koreans. The idea that you can make a rational appeal to his moral conscience is, well, beyond silly.
Moreover, Kim may just be on the way out. There are rumblings of discontent in the totalitarian state unseen in its 61-year history.
As Claudia Rosett wrote recently in Forbes, North Korea's normally docile citizens appear to be fed up with Kim. "Furious over a confiscatory currency 'reform,'" Rosett writes, "citizens of the world's most repressive state have begun publicly criticizing their government. It is hard to overstate just how bold a move that is."
This is extraordinary, given Kim's murderous proclivities.
By some estimates Kim has killed 3.5 million people or more out of a population of 23 million. The murder toll includes children and infants. The deaths have come from starvation, beatings, torture and inhumane incarceration in hellish concentration camps.
It's bad enough that we tolerate genocide. But someday soon, he — or his ally, Iran — will have the means to attack us. Just last week, a North Korean plane was detained in Bangkok carrying 35 tons of missiles, explosives and other weaponry. Where it was going, no one's sure. No doubt we'll send them a stern letter in rebuke. :lol:
Rather than sending Kim conciliatory notes, which he'll no doubt laugh at and see as U.S. weakness, the White House would be wise to exploit the North Koreans' disgust and anger at Kim. Our goal should be regime change and nuclear disarmament — anything short of that, including endless "six-party talks," will be useless.

==========================================================

We are being governed by the most inexperienced and naive President ever elected.

I hope the world isn't falling apart by 2012, when we can rectify the situation. Otherwise, I'm leaving folks.
 
Top