AP: The super spreaders behind top COVID-19 conspiracy theories

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
"valid negative health reasoning".. erm, I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean.

I'm not on the CDC ACIP panel, did not watch the meeting, and have not seen the data yet, so can't really comment there knowledgably. I would assume that the highly educated folks on the panel had good reasons for the way they voted, and yes I find it in conflict with the basic foundations of democracy to have a single individual override a committee vote.

I hope the best for your wife, but I'm surprised to hear that you feel that she is not protected from the two jabs which she's already gotten. So, are these vaccines waning in protection or aren't they? You can't have it both ways. If efficacy is waning, then just admit it, and then you may have some valid reasoning for a booster. However I've seen you say how effective they still are, yet you think your wife needs a boost for some reason. Curious.
More trolling shit from you.

Your anti vaccine death cult trolling is bullshit.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Nice deflection. You didn't answer the question though I noticed. I'm out for a bit. Bye.
You mean I didn't answer your bullshit trolling. And you are correct I didn't answer your stupid as shit question that is just like the stupid questions that Fox asks everyday to try to score some bullshit points that are really just being asked to get brainwashed cultists to nod along like you have some kind of point.

What you are asking is basically the same as saying if you need to use another condom does that means that condoms don't work. It is bullshit.

I have to get a tetanus shot randomly does that mean that they don't work? Of course not, does that mean that there is some waning effect? I have no idea I am not a crybaby anti vaccine clown and just suck it up and get the shot when the doctor asks.

The facts are that this vaccine is very safe and very effective based on hundreds of millions of people getting it and the fact that the people who are filling up the hospitals with the Corona virus are almost exclusively unvaccinated. So your trying to spam this site with shit that you pretend says otherwise is just you being a death cult troll.

Im not a doctor or a virologist or anything in between, so I might not have all the correct words or perfect information, but I do know that you are full of shit with the overwhelming evidence that you have given us to see it. Your condescending trolling might work with your kids and people in your life that are sick of listening to you Karen at them about your misguided beliefs, but at the end of the day you are not clever or persuasive, you are just a dick that people are sick of arguing with.

But that doesn't mean that you are not dangerous to the people who you have influence over or whackadoos that stumble across your spam online. So at the very least I truly hope that this is just you needing to pay the rent with your death cult spam and that you are making sure that the people you know are not being the danger you try to sell here.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Does anyone know where I can find an uneducated white male with a narcissistic superhero complex looking to save everyone if only people would listen?

They're really tough to come by these days.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Hmm.. problem here tho.. If you look at the Round 1 through 7 scenarios, they don't seem to have been accurate with their predictions at all.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
@mooray I come with positive news today!..

Sorry if I wasn't clear. When I complain about you posting 99% negative, it's regarding vaccines.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Oh, my bad. Here's some positive news then:
So you're still in kind of a troll mode..? Bummer, because your ability to not be that way was why I liked you.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
So you're still in kind of a troll mode..? Bummer, because your ability to not be that way was why I liked you.
Well like I said, the viewpoint of something being positive or negative is very subjective. I view it as a positive thing that people's medical and religious rights are being protected, but you view it as a negative thing. If you really like me for my abilities, you should be happy to know that I have not lost any of my abilities recently.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Well like I said, the viewpoint of something being positive or negative is very subjective. I view it as a positive thing that people's medical and religious rights are being protected, but you view it as a negative thing. If you really like me for my abilities, you should be happy to know that I have not lost any of my abilities recently.
Well....you're straight up lying right now. We've had conversations here on the forum and via PM and you've said that you post the negative side as an attempt to bring balance.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Well....you're straight up lying right now. We've had conversations here on the forum and via PM and you've said that you post the negative side as an attempt to bring balance.
Nope, you called it negative, not me. I simply said that I post alternative info to provide balance.
 
Top