Strains like backyard boogie. I doubt they had decent weed back then....they didn't have the resources, the nutrients, the nice grow rooms etc. to produce the weed that the growers both professional mmj and novice grows today.
Strains like backyard boogie. I doubt they had decent weed back then....they didn't have the resources, the nutrients, the nice grow rooms etc. to produce the weed that the growers both professional mmj and novice grows today.
Really? Why don't you do some research on the potency of marijuana and how it has gotten stronger over the years. Go talk to a Vietnam vet or any hippie from the 60s and 70s that still tokes.
I'm not going to argue the fact that weed is more potent now than in the past.
Strains like backyard boogie. I doubt they had decent weed back then....they didn't have the resources, the nutrients, the nice grow rooms etc. to produce the weed that the growers both professional mmj and novice grows today.
Actually that's false, though I can agree with you that the grow room technology has advanced, the potency of the weed available was high in strains known to growers, such as Thai Stick, Hindu Kush, Northern Lights and Panama Red. True they weren't to the degree or % that some strains are today, but to think that everyone in the 60's and 70's just smoke Mexican brick weed is false.
Edit: If I make it 98 and be able to light a pipe or doob without lighting myself on fire would be a good thing.
Really? Why don't you do some research on the potency of marijuana and how it has gotten stronger over the years. Go talk to a Vietnam vet or any hippie from the 60s and 70s that still tokes.
I'm not going to argue the fact that weed is more potent now than in the past.
Who was taking THC readings a thousand years ago in india ? a little arrogant to think we are the first to produce high THC product. I think the "Superweed era" has just been fabricated to demonize the weed anyway.