300$ light??

ҖҗlegilizeitҗҖ

Well-Known Member
You are replacing 1000 watt HID with a 450 watt Spider Farmer? In a 4x4 that only 28 watts per square foot. Don't you feel that is a bit underpowered? I am running 630 watts at full strength in my 4x4 which is what I replaced my 1000 watt HID with. Just curious.
You are totally right there, the sf4000 and 1000w HID are not 1 for 1 exactly. I have added 3 sf1000s and now have more light than I did with my 1000w
The SF4000 is very comparable to a 750w HID though
 

getogrow

Well-Known Member
I disagree.
You give your plants 25 DLI for minimum "optimal" growth.
You give them 45 DLI for maximum "optimal" growth
You can pump it up to 60 DLI, and they may not show adverse reactions, but they still won't grow any faster than at 45 DLI without CO2
All you are doing is using more electricity, for the same output.
My point is that wasting electricity is MUCH better then playing with defs and "tuning" ect.... If he has never seen a problem running 70 DLI then its not hurting anything , carry on.
 

getogrow

Well-Known Member
You are totally right there, the sf4000 and 1000w HID are not 1 for 1 exactly. I have added 3 sf1000s and now have more light than I did with my 1000w
The SF4000 is very comparable to a 750w HID though
Same here , i replaced 2x 1k hps for 2x 650w bar lights. Its no where near a 1 for 1 trade but its a base to start at. Im lacking that intense light right under the hps but i gained more light around the edges, now my girls all look the same. The center plants are not bigger then the outside plants like hps. So overall , i have more light output then 2k hps with 1200 actual watts from the wall.
 

getogrow

Well-Known Member
Airflow has nothing to do with co2 enrichment besides giving the plants a fresh supply of whats there. If the room is 500 ppm co2, it doesn't matter how much air flow you have, your limiting factor is still that 500 ppm of co2
The first part is debateable on a small level and the second part is spot on. if your room is 500 ppm then your stuck there but if your room has little or no fresh air coming in then your limiting factor is going to be the airflow causing the co2 to be very low. a tent is a good example , if it does not have good fresh air coming in then your co2 ppm is going to be 200 ish where as if you pump fresh air in it will raise up to 4 or 500 ish.

So not saying your wrong at all, just adding to it....
 

Datcoldboi

Well-Known Member
It’s not that hard. A cheap cool tube and a inline fan. Still get you under 300$

HID is like a Ford pickup. It just works.
Cheap led is like buying a Kia with full load leather and a sun roof. But scratching your head as to why is won’t handle well and last like a Honda.

don’t get me wrong I’m all for LED. Both my tents are rigged with Cobs.
Im using a Timber 4VS in my main tent
 

1212ham

Well-Known Member
Where are you getting wattage info for the sun? A watt is a measure of electricity, not light.
Comparing the sun to grow lights isn't really useful unless you're trying to figure out what spectrum to use, or whether to grow outdoors or indoors.
I'd also point out that due to the hight of the sun in the sky and clouds etc, the sun doesn't deliver full power all day, a light can.
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Where are you getting wattage info for the sun? A watt is a measure of electricity, not light.
Comparing the sun to grow lights isn't really useful unless you're trying to figure out what spectrum to use, or whether to grow outdoors or indoors.
How much solar power does a square meter receive?
Translation: At high noon on a clear day, each square meter receives 1000 watts of solar power... And its way more at the equator, and in the Andes Mountains. 10-14 kwh/m2/day, and super high doses of UVA/B. Equador has been observed as having as much UVA/B as Mars at 20,000ft. 26 on the 1-10 scale.




1610668631759.png
 

ҖҗlegilizeitҗҖ

Well-Known Member
How much solar power does a square meter receive?
Translation: At high noon on a clear day, each square meter receives 1000 watts of solar power... And its way more at the equator, and in the Andes Mountains. 10-14 kwh/m2/day, and super high doses of UVA/B. Equador has been observed as having as much UVA/B as Mars at 20,000ft. 26 on the 1-10 scale.




View attachment 4796604
Great
Now look at DLI which is actually relevant to plant growth
No where in the country receives more than 65 DLI (and thats only at the peak of the season)
Screenshot_20210114-180436_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20210114-180450_Chrome.jpg
During flowering, there's no where in the country getting over 45 DLI
Screenshot_20210114-180606_Chrome.jpg
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Thats for USA, not the Equator. USA is nothing compared to the equator, and then add in 8000ft altitude. Also looks like it can go to 65.. Im hitting what? 70?? Which is less, or the same as some places at the equator, and at 8000ft altitude.


Normal ranges
Outdoors, DLI values vary depending on latitude, time of year, and cloud cover. Occasionally, values OVER........ 70 mol·m−2·d−1 can be reached at bright summer days at some locations

Notice it says.. MORE THAN 70 in some places?????
 
Last edited:

1212ham

Well-Known Member
Ive looked at this light myself, but surely for 300$ theres something better? Im even open to any DIY projects.
For a 2.5 x 5 I'd make two lights with 2 foot strips and Meanwell 200 or 240 watt drivers.


 

ҖҗlegilizeitҗҖ

Well-Known Member
Thats for USA, not the Equator. USA is nothing compared to the equator, and then add in 8000ft altitude. Also looks like it can go to 65.. Im hitting what? 70?? Which is less, or the same as some places at the equator, and at 8000ft altitude.


Normal ranges
Outdoors, DLI values vary depending on latitude, time of year, and cloud cover. Occasionally, values OVER........ 70 mol·m−2·d−1 can be reached at bright summer days at some locations

Notice it says.. MORE THAN 70 in some places?????
Lol your point is still moot
Botanists study this stuff.
Cannabis maxs out at 60 DLI with co2 ranges of 1500ppm
Without CO2 enrichment, they max out around 45 DLI
Screenshot_20201110-192138_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20210114-191302_Google.jpg
 

Bookush34

Well-Known Member
All this talk about wasted electricity. Hahaha.
just like my gas guzzler Ford. You don’t have to have your foot into it all the time.
And we can all agree leds are more efficient turned down.
Here is 900watts Hindo packed into a 3x3.
E2FE15C3-BFEB-4AA3-BC31-28174FAC2CF9.jpeg

If you can’t handle the power you should drive a KIA.
 

Datcoldboi

Well-Known Member
Sounds like a waste of wattage lol
Veg at lowest setting, then 50-75% in flower? What's the point? Haha
IMO its best to get a light that at 100% power, perfectly illuminates the grow space.
I'd say 300-400w of LED with a dimmer for veg would be more than enough for the OP
400w just to veg? I was gonna use this light to flower 2 photos first & the one im looking at (sf-2000) only pulls 200w from the wall
 

kovidkough

Well-Known Member
Well I certainly wouldn't compare the Spiderfarmer to a kia lol
Hid is more like a Ford model T
And the spiderfarmer is a 1500 pickup lol

For example, for me, my Spiderfarmer is replacing my $200 1000w HID light that cost me $850 a year to run with all the needed extra ventilation. Plus atleast $100 a year in bulbs that need to be replaced.
My $570 SF4000 replaces that, using only
$370 a year
Thats pretty easy math, thats $580 in savings, in one year, more than it costs to buy my LED, brand new, all over again for free
every time you point this out I consider Leds just slightly more. perhaps it's time to get out of the stone age
 
Top