Search results

i beg to differ there is some pretty fire bud out there and i'm 99% sure it's done by weight ppl have spent years cloning and breeding to get some high quality stuff

nice! i'm tuning into to this.. good luck, hope you have killer grow. :]

Anything really different really.. I just listened to Einsturzende and that is some weird shit, but it's definetly not the kind of music I was talking about.. It sounds like german chants over weird sounds but I'll give it a 10 for weirdness :] I guess I mean't more progressive than experimental...

yea, it's a win-win for certain situations beef up your buds and keep the height down.. go for it! but when you do start a journal so we can help, and watch!

well that's good to here from reading grow journals and what not it seems like MH are worth it right now i'm using CFl and they are working but I'm gonna bring in a MH or flowering and see if that gives it a boost.. you think you'll get a significant yield increase with MH grow?

Is that what you use for all your grows? and also I read something about them having a short bulb life.. Any experience with this?

seems like everybody digs melodic stuff. anybody any to any experimental stuff? not that i don't like just about everything ppl have said so far just wondering.. p.s. - pink floyd is GOD

i will agree with you on everything except less acid, acid has it's place it can be a great tool to reexamine weed is great to stimulate and relax but not strong enough to do deep examination in my opinion well at least acid is cheaper, stronger, lasts longer acid is good to do everyone once in...

When did I say don't use objectives? that's what i was couraging, i didn't want comparisons

i totally agree that's the point that i was trying sort of an exercise of appreciation i did it, and i realized just how amazing colors really are idk, may sound stupid but i think it pays to sit back and appreciate the simpler things humble yourslef, think

AHH! you all aren't getting my question or perhaps i wasn't specific enough probably the latter of the two.. anyhow, what i mean't was describe a color using adjectives without simply comparin to another object of the same color.. Is that really DESCRIBING the actually COLOR? NO, so give it a...

thanks i have a local hydro store i think i'll do that :]

no, you're still doing it you're still just naming an object of that color 'snowey mountains' i wanted to get away from that here I'll try one Green: earthy, organic, growth now you see..

Where can I get them? Do local stores have them? How much do they typically cost?

do have a grow journal or something, i wanna see the set-up and stats for this grow! looks good man, happy toking just gotta be patient..

congratulations to Argentina! think about the celebrations and shenanigans that would occur if that happened in the US. one day, you're just sitting on the couch having a toke and you're flipping through channels and BAM headline new on CNN marijuiana legalized! brings a tear to my eye :DD

congratulations to Argentina!

anything cypress hill is always good this is quite possibly one of the hardest question i've ever been asked i guess anything made by any body/or group of ppl who smoke ALOT of weed during the making of the song/album which is ALOT of ppl

thanks that's the idea i was going after trying to describe the "essence" of a color in someways we can only describe how a color makes us feel or the things/emotions in reminds us of Black - dark, bold, cold white and black are definetly the easiest due to contrast try tackling purple...

well i was trying to get ppl to decribe the actually properties of a particular color not just name an bject of that color we can all do that. naming an object of that color doesn't really describe color, not so easy now is it..