Search results

  1. T

    Electing Hillary would be dangerous

    Sure there is - Ralph Nader. No one can argue that he's a member of the status quo.
  2. T

    Electing Hillary would be dangerous

    I concur with just about everything you say here. Unfortunately, though, I don't seen anything changing anytime soon. For that to happen the American public would have to get an intelligence. And I don't see that happening anytime soon. Keep in mind, we're talking about the same public that...
  3. T

    Electing Hillary would be dangerous

    McCain is very definitely quite the war monger.
  4. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    The reason that I chose the title I did for this thread is because I don't believe that any rationally minded person could read the essay that this thread is based on and still attach any credibility to Christianity. Keep in mind, I said any rationally minded person. Ultimately there's people...
  5. T

    Electing Hillary would be dangerous

    It's a good thing that Barack Obama appears to have the nomination locked up, electing Hillary Clinton could just turn out to be dangerous: http://www.unintimidatedpress.com/hillary.htm
  6. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Boy, talk about an easy response to debunk. But before I do I want to say that I think you're really a Christian who's masquerading as a non-believer in order to give the appearance of impartiality. I mean, that's what it looks like to me. You defend Christianity as fervently as any Jesus freak...
  7. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    If what the Christians believe is true, at the current death rate around the world God would have only .57 seconds to judge a person at the time of their death before moving on to the next. Do you believe your god can actually do that? And even if he could, would he?
  8. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    If you're talking about biblical scripture, the bible doesn't have any credibility with me. None. Zilch. Nada.
  9. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Insert joke here)xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  10. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    No validity? The point that if the Christian god and his son were who the Christians say they were, there should be certain things that we should see when we look back to the time of Jesus, well, that's not a valid point, huh? See only what you want to see, my friend.
  11. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Nice job of quoting out of context to meet your own agenda. Nice job of seeing only what you want to see.
  12. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    The article was just pointing out a simple fact there. The Christians do in fact go around claiming that they're being persecuted. The article doesn't persecute anyone. It justs asks pertinent and legitimate questions or raises pertinent and legitimate issues regarding Christianity's...
  13. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    The "maturity" part was easy. She had the maturity to think for herself, unlike some of the people who've responded to this thread. The "intelligence" part was related to the first part - she had the intelligence to have the maturity to think for herself.
  14. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Your comments are very warmly received by the originator of this thread. Your intelligence and maturity transcends many of the individuals who've responded so far.
  15. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    I think you're missing the point. Let's face it, people can make a science out of debunking Christianity, and I'm sure that scholars have tried to do just that. Someone could probably create a four-year college corriculum based entirely on debunking Christianity. But that's the beauty of this...
  16. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Oh, no, not another "rant" comment. Can't you people at least be original? The first person that responded to this thread used the term "rant" and everyone who trashed it afterword just cloned her. What's the matter? Can't you people think for yourselves? What are you? Zombies? But in...
  17. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Hooray for you! Finally someone who can think for himself shows up!
  18. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Congratulations. Your remarks only reinforce my belief in the credibility of the piece. They do nothing toward shaking my belief that the piece does what it says it does. In fact, why did you even bother?
  19. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    It needs to be reiterated for people to make up their own minds when judging the piece. Clearly, many of those who have posted to this thread have all sorts of prejudices and biases going in (I suspect many are Christians). This point is proven by the fact that these individuals spend most of...
  20. T

    Christianity has been debunked once and for all

    Shamegame, it's clear to me that you judged the piece going in with anything but an unbiased and open mind. You judged the piece on the basis of everything and anything except the main thing: Its content. That point was proven when you went off on a tangent and even started attacking the...
Back
Top