Search results

Yup. Buddy of a family member is already using it to good effect and once the family member gets their MMPR, I expect they'll go the same route. Don't know if it is the 12:0 or 17:1. Eagerly awaiting the 9:9 and whatever else they have in the works. They've looked at the Peace Naturals list and...

And what is your plan if it turns out that HC wants all the vid stored?

I don't believe they will have to discriminate harshly. I think the applicants will mostly be flakier than a box of raisin bran and there will be very few applicants that can get their act together.

...and I don't think anyone on these forums knows what CMC, IND or DMF stand for when it comes to dealing with Health Canada. A DIN does not just pop out of the air, someone has to do the research and submit the package = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

If you want to make some noise by raising a DIN, start here: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/prodpharma/pre_din_ind-eng.pdf Anyone who wants a DIN for MM should buy from PPS/CML, because they are likely the only crew with the know-how to pull it off. The faster you...

What "counter parts"? There is nothing like the MMPR LP set up in the USA. There is no federal progamme that imposes all of these safety regulations and restricts production to LP facilities. The only thing close at the moment is Bedrocan in the Netherlands.

Only one?! Most pharma companies have MSc and PhD folks oozing from the cleanroom woodwork.

I was just happy to find a site wherein folks seemed to communicate in coherent English, Kootenaygirl being a case in point. For example, IC & CC have an egregious amount of cacophony; hard to find the wheat for the chaff.

CanniMed Ltd seems to be the only one currently shipping. Have you called any of them to check for their courier/postal times and costs?

And you'd thing it'd be even longer in French. If the MMPR section is anything like other HC sections I've dealt with, French should not delay them and might even speed them up.

That's disheartening. I hope their new, non-HC contract stuff is an improvement.

Irradiation likely had little to do with the taste. Was that more recent than Kootenaygirl's 2007 experience? I've heard some of the earlier product was lacklustre.

On the up side, he's given us a possible replacement for the phrase "like comparing apples and oranges".

Buy HC's stuff from PPS, which has tested it before release. Otherwise, it should "simply" be a matter of legal product transfers and money. Start by contacting the MMPR labs listed in another thread on this page (Experchem Laboratories Inc. seems to have recently announced that they are ready).

I think he meant "hydro"electric, not "hydro"philic.

Thanks, that clarified it for me. I see from the their Facebook page that CML received a smidgen of positive feedback for their 17:1 from a patient going by " Alishams Hassam". Maybe they've learned something in the last 6 years?

Let's start with the dull MMPR and CDSA document reviews that shows Kootenaygirl seems to be on the right path: MMPR: There are no restrictions on how dried marihuana is to be ingested or inhaled, and patients may choose to use it, for example in foods or by vaporizing. HC does not limit or...

Has anyone, tongue in cheek, submitted this as their disposal method? http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20130280343&OS=20130280343&RS=20130280343

Probably best to ask HC just in case they have added any labs...or dropped some.

...and are you sure the WHO amount is not for release testing of hemp crops? From what I've read, the sampling size seems bigger for that than for the law enforcement tests but I could just be forgetting how much the WHO mandates for that.