Search results

UncleBuck, you clearly are the king here of trolling strawman arguments.

Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post...

As I already stated no one invited me here. It was the misinformation you made about my list that got me here.

It is fascinating that you cannot debate me on any facts relating to climate change but instead have to desperately introduce red herrings.

I take it you like Poptarts?

Still Trolling?

Notice he cannot name them. How come no one arguing against me can actually support their arguments? Instead they make bullshit allegations that they cannot back up.

Please name them. The only sites I have ever been banned from are alarmist or far left political websites because they cannot debate me.

You can find a more detailed analysis of my censorship at Skeptical Science here, Skeptical Science: The Censorship of Poptech They were unable to debate me and had to resort to censorship as they cannot have anyone reading my arguments.

How do you know that? The increasing web hits to the list say otherwise. The only reason I am here is because of the misinformation you stated about my list, of which I have corrected. I am well aware you are incapable of debating me and you putting me on the ignore list is proof of this.

No you got just about everything wrong. No it was not identical. I already stated that Robinson admitted to copying the style but you cropped his full comment again, What you are effectively arguing is that the scientists complaining to the NAS about the paper were absolutely incompetent...

See post #119.

You can't really be this slow?

This is by far the fastest I have seen anyone online being unable to come back with intelligent arguments and instead resort so fast to strawmans and trolling.

You only have two arguments 1. Strawman 2. Troll Keep trying I am sure you can learn to do better.

How is the trolling going? Did anyone fall for the bait yet?

How is the trolling going?

What about my signature link? That is why I original posted, to quickly correct some nonsense stated about it. I made none of your other strawman arguments. Why can you not formulate an actual argument?

Why are you changing the subject after I refuted you in extensive detail on climate change? Are you conceding defeat?

The link says 1999. I was only posting the peer-reviewed versions of the paper not the original non-peer-reviewed version. Why do you keep lying? Quote and source one reputable site that claims the original paper had a NAS heading. You are really embarrassing yourself. Why are you lying...