Search results

Actually it's what you don't say that sums up your position quite well. You can't reply with any integrity to my concept because it's upholding the definition of the meter and the proper use of reference frames. You know my statements are accurate so you change the scenario so you don't have to...

I'm not clinging to that, I was pointing out that it was a BS question. If you want to make a statement that nobody on a stoner website could possibly disprove SR and provide the correct method then be my guest. You know you'd be wrong to say that, because it is possible, unless you can show how...

Run Lucas Formula, which is 8ml Micro, 16 ml bloom of the 3 part series. Good for the entire grow. https://www.rollitup.org/general-marijuana-growing/550108-lucas-formula-overview.html

You fall into the same category as Doer, the category in which you evade answering questions posed to you, and in turn reply with gibberish. I asked you a slew of questions in post #77 which you failed to answer. If you want to carry on a conversation with me then you need to start answering the...

You're the first person I've seen post that didn't like PE. The standard comment about PE is how awesome it is. I'll soon find out.

Except that's not the way gravity works. You (and current scientific theory) have it wrong. Mass does not come together, mass moves apart, and rightfully so, since the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always INCREASES. That means mass gets less dense over time by means of...

Day 36, (11 of 12/12)

So you evade the scene until you think the coast is clear and then when you do make a reappearance you only throw personal insults around. When are you going to answer my questions that I asked of you? Your drivel is meaningless, and I will not carry on a one sided conversation with you. What's...

You mean "more likely" as in not 100%? You mean there is a slight chance that a stoner on a website could be right and all those "brilliant" theorists could be wrong? Is that what you are implying, that a stoner on a website could be right?

I'm upholding the definition of the meter, SR does not. Explain to me how you determine the length of a meter in a frame, using light and clocks, according to SR and I will show you the error of your way. What does the origin of the definition have to do with light traveling at a constant...

So what you are saying is that we can eliminate either the term space, or the term universe from our vocabulary, since they are the exact same thing according to you? Mathematically, if space is represented as a, and the universe is represented as b, you are saying a=b, and therefor b=a...

You should be a politician if not already one, your ability to evade the issue is exceptional! I said: Do you agree with those numbers? If not, clearly state in the context of the example given why you don't agree and give the numbers you think are correct. Please don't go off on another...

So you ask me a question, I give you specifics, and later actual numbers, with the concept just as clear as can be, and you have no response to the actual concept or numbers, but simply rebut with gibberish. Please explain clearly in you own words, staying on topic, where I go wrong. I have...

No, I speak of space as simply a volume in which light travels and defines distance. I made no mention of an aether. The universe is an object in space. The universe is getting less dense by means of expanding its volume. The volume of the universe is the volume of space that the universe...

Yeah, it really shines the light on how what you dwell on is what you become. You are the engineer of your life. You can choose to live an angry life because of what someone did to you in the past, or you can let it go and move on to bigger and better things. Do NOT let someone drag you down!

It doesn't matter what it USED to be defined as, or it's origin, it is what it is today. Even if you were to change it back my theory would still be correct and Einstein's wrong. The definition is what helped me along to see how it really works, which allowed me to see Einstein's mistakes. No...

No. The preferred frame is space. Light travel time defines distance in the preferred frame. Absolute velocity is the velocity of the object in the preferred frame (space). That velocity is not relative to another object, it is relative to a point in space which is incapable of motion in the...

Light travel time defines distance in the preferred frame. Light is emitted at time t=0 at a point in space from a source, and light travels spherically away from that point in space that it was emitted. The distance the light travels is ct from the point of emission. The absolute velocity of...

Are you denying the definition of a meter is as follows?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meter The metre (meter in American English), symbol m, is the fundamental unit of length in the International System of Units (SI).Originally intended to be one ten-millionth of the distance from the...

I don't have a TOE, I have a theory of absolute velocity.