Search results

they are the same incident. If he called the police it would be the same incident report. there must be 2 separate instances of stalking.

you are an idiot. you just described the same incident as if they were two separate occasions.

does everyone who takes temazepam experience aggression, sweaty pie?

I knew you would post that. what makes you so certain he was experiencing this side affect?

once again GZ was not stalking. there must be at least 2 instances for it to be considered stalking. what he was doing was following, which is not a violation of any law and is common practice for neighborhood watch

neither of those are prescribed for treating aggression

So far, there has not been one shread of evidence to support that George Zimerma violated any Florida law. It is unknown whether Trayvon Martin intended to break any laws or not. All we have is his father's accusations-who, btw, was not at the residence of his alleged girlfrined when Trayvon...

then who did u call a monsoon

lol, UncleBuck is apparently so anti-racist that he is in fact racist

yes, I think its because posts are getting deleted.

well I see you took the second quote out, even too out of context for you after all?

yeah my posts are getting deleted and somehow I lost a rep point too

I just took you to school on the definition of stalking, which you clearly knew nothing about. And following suspicious behavior in your neighborhood is not illegal. ive finished school btw, and am not a child. can you say the same?

if Im the most racist thing you've ever come across then you don't know what racism is.

stalking is illegal. in order for it to be considered stalking in a court of law it must occur on at least 2 separate occasion, therefore GZ was not stalking, he was following, suspicious behavior at that. Go back to school kiddo.

you = pulling out of context once again, reference = your sig

he did need to go home because he was being stalked/profiled/hassled. and it was raining. why didn't he identify himself to zimm? I certainly would have been like "can I help you" "why are you following me". it is because of his checkered past and present that he did not do this.

why do you say he ran away twice? are you saying he ran away, then came back, and then ran away again?

how can you say he didn't need to go home? If my son is being followed the only thing I want him to be thinking about is getting home. Especially if he is dressed like a gang banger in the dark of night while it is raining.

it was raining and it was night time. and he was being followed by a grown man. and he had a skittle and tea delivery to make. how can you say he did not need to go home? it makes no sense for him not too after he was running away from a man that was following him.