Search results

Exactly, that's why we should consider restricting guns from people that haven't proven they are up to the privelege. Shit maybe I would fail based on my use of "high powered" lol.

Do you think every person in the US really needs to know or wants to know how to kill with a gun? You think that is desirable and will have better results? Do you even consider the unintended consequences or understand why some people are against killing no matter what the situation?

I did all those things, still shoot. Don't see the need for an AR15, but I have friends and family that own them. Keep nit picking and dismissing based on irrelevant terminology though.

No, that's just the narrative the teletube sells you. They get you to focus on nitpicking pointless details and irrelavant inaccuracies so that you dismiss or forget about the legitimate arguments. But at least you know better that more guns = more safer.

So why not just sell people grenades, rocket launchers, fully automatic guns?

I meant to point to the purpose of rifles (trajectory/bullet design, longer range). I've seen high power used to mean the same thing, but you're right the term makes no sense.

Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world and have to take measures that make sense in reality to prevent senseless death, whether from accidents or negligence. I own guns and hunt every year. Still doesnt change the facts of the retarded logic I'm mocking.

I've seen people suggest arming teachers, having armed guards, and arming unemployed veterans at schools across the US. Because obviously we all know the NaRrAtive... More Guns = More Safer and I've just got to say... ...why not just cut out the middle man and give the kids the guns... The...

You aren't schooling anybody you dotard. I know those terms better than you do evidently. What do you call using offensive force to punish a person who used offensive force to harm another person?

Lol you claim victory after that spew of nonsense? "It's not peace, it just looks like peace" Holy fuck you bumbling dumbass! So not only is the status quo superior in every way possible, now you admit your way includes slavery, discrimination, murder, rape, because we can't tell people what...

You guys have some epic meltdowns. Poor snowflakes. The evidence keeps getting posted day after day, the quotes are verbatim and in context. Buck may be a dick, but he's rarely wrong.

Holding America and other nations to moral standards is anti-American? Wanting to improve America by mitigating gun deaths, reforming healthcare, reducing the deficit, reducing military aggression etc. is anti-American?

Tyranny, abuse, slavery will exist de facto under your ideology, not mine. My way has the possibility of legislating for or against slavery. Do you see no upside to the law? Where is the harm in forcing people not to he enslaved/indentured? What is the harm in forcing people not to arbitrarily...

If you love Putin so much maybe you should consider relocating.

What is this foreign politics attitude, comrade?

"I need a gun because it is the best way to defend myself." vs "Killers could use anything, the tool doesn't matter. Knives/bombs/cars are just as dangerous as guns."

The logic is perfect: minorities, women, the disabled, etc. have a right not to be discriminated against and denied services offered to the public. I don't prefer involuntary association, but I realize our history of race relations and the ramifications. You are advocating for injustice in the...

The "laws don't work argument" is retarded, sure, but it's another obvious case of right-wing hypocrisy. If laws don't work, why have any immigration laws? Illegal immigrants will just cross anyway. No wall, no border security, no point, right?

lol like you've read Marx.