Search results

equation is correct the way it is being used seems to give contradictory results

no sorry it does not add up completely 10 is still 6 *1.6 if i am accelerating 6 times faster than you then i will have a velocity 6 times faster than you. this follows directly from the wiki link Instantaneous velocity vi of a falling object after elapsed time t: Thus v = 10*1 which...

i said that it was obviously wrong did u not c that?

from your wiki link: Instantaneous velocity vi of a falling object after elapsed time t: Thus v = 10*1 which equals 10 ! ok

with respect hom36, with much much respect (u r the only one who followed the math) i appreciate the route you followed is correct it is not i that disputes the formula the math itself does plz lets put the personals aside and deal with the math ok?

nonono the whole time g is constant, not only after the first second! it always accelerating at 9.8 !!! not only after the first second !!!

so u think that if i accelerate for 1 second @ 10m.s^2 then my velocity is not 10 metres per second ? my velocity starts at 0 over one second it increases by 10 0+10 = 10 or what? please show my humble error in this? an acceleration of 10m.s^-2 means my velocity is increasing by...

following on from the way you did this math i will use your method to prove your method is wrong so put your numbers back into the formula to see if the distance covered returns the same amount.ie 2m. g=m.s^-2 9.8=m.(.64)^2 therefore m =.4/9.8 which means m = 0.04 which is obviously wrong...

y do u have to be such a condescending prick just bcos u have been proven totally wrong by my simple photos of 1940's film tech. if you can take a fucking glorified quadbike to the moon, y not a little camera? u would still have a few minutes of real footage, could sell for millions where i...

coming soon real maths in open source vb code please quote the source for this formulae its a simple iteration, why r u square rooting? (i'll get back 2u on this) 9.8 m.s^-2 means that after 1 sec the velocity is 9.8 m.s 1.6 m.s^-2 means that after 1 sec the velocity is...

1940's Rervere Miniature Movie Camera as they say in france : touche' ;-J

for the lazy folks

recently footage was released of adolph hitler with a mini camera not much bigger than a modern vidcam here is a sample of a camera from the 1940's...

... and wikipedia are the archetypal conspiracy theorists ... ... and stoney has a big nose ... (thats why u she only shows her eyes and mouth) (and boy does she have a big mouth)

by what miracle of maths do you arrive at this conclusion? plz show me your calculations. what do pendulums have to do with it anyway? thats completely irrelevant despite the pendelum moving (accelerating) at 1.6 instead of 9.8 y would the russians have never gone to the moon themselves? if...

I too am Celtic/Teutonic

with eyes like that \\\\\(shivers)///// i'd be a runnin' for da hills even if u had scarlet johansen's posterior

so 1.6m.s^-2 is not 1/6 the rate of acceleration of 9.8 m.s^-2 ?????? or IS 1.6 1/6th of 9.8 ??????

in cahoots with others no doubt, just a hunch based on what i said earlier in the thread, and validated with a graph, and that would be German and Saxon colonials. as well as tarantatarahhhhhhh!!!!!!! did u think all the nazis neatly surrended in '45? Nazi hunter - Wikipedia, the...

do you think the dif would be anything more than who's face is on the stamps?