Search results

You reference a high school textbook as quotes from scientists? Have you forgotten how corrupt gov education is?

Padawanbater2: cleanup your post. Kind of confusing As far as MJ laws go there is a much bigger problem there. Just join me in my quest to abolish all laws passed in 1913.

The difference he doesn't claim dictatorial powers on the matter. A trait that is often missing on the left. Overturning the decision returns the debate to where it belongs both morally and constitutionally: to the States. Most.. not all. Does not warrant the attack on the entire class. That...

1. To my knowledge Romney did not say he would overturn Roe v. Wade if he becomes President. He said he wants the courts to. 2. Contrary to liberal spin, overturning Roe v. Wade does not outlaw abortion. 3. I once blamed Republicans for being ignorant to facts regarding things like evolution...

Alternatively it would cause a natural rise in rent which would create incentive to.buy houses which would help the housing market.

You're my hero.

You collect online persona recommendations? For what purpose?

Only if you don't withdraw before a certain age. But no, its totally okay for the government to own your asshole until they grant your financial freedom, right?

Lol Is the last S invisible or are you just lazy?

Glad your baseless talking points are within reach.

Yup. Nobody in the middle class has IRAs, 401ks, and savings accounts.

Pointless question. I never put any blame on any President.

That is the exact nonsense conservatives argue against. Nobody is arguing that you can immediately change the situation, but spending more money is merely compounding the situation. Those diehard Keynesians somehow argue both "for the middle class" and increasing spending programs all the while...

Those on the left must hate cutting capital gains and interest tax because it allows for the middle class to be more independent. Independence is to damn greedy.

Should have been fair and asked the same of Obama. Just asking Romney showed ignorance and bias.

Who the hell cares about the polls. If there is one conspiracy I subscribe to it's the one where pollsters alter results in order to tighten the race. Party and candidate are merely after thoughts.

They only do that shit for dumb voters. In reality it means absolutely nothing no matter what political affiliation. Good troll as usual.

There is no basis of proof to even come to that conclusion. Racism is independent of political ideology. Liberals just love to label people who don't agree with them as racist.

In what way would that be true?

This is purely a case of Deja vu. Have we forgotten about this? http://m.cbsnews.com/storysynopsis.rbml?pageType=cbsthismorning&catid=57510158&feed_id=30 Regardless of political affiliation, this is just more proof that neocons and neoliberals should all go fuck themselves.