Search results

The lockdowns failed and it's time to reopen. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/coronavirus-european-markets-countries-discuss-easing-lockdowns-073817596.html

Weak as fuck. Just because I'm not a hardcore Biden supporter like you doesn't mean I'm pushing Trump's agenda. When you make shit polarized like that you just seem really worried about his fragility. That's why you keep trying to keep this thread up, because I'm the one who started it and you...

I guess. The more I revisit the notion the less I think it really does matter so much. It's a lesser evil vote. I predict very low voter turnout and Biden's campaign seems so fragile. Good luck!

Did you really just paste a reply from another thread to this thread in order to bump it? I don't understand the point of that. Is your candidate's campaign really that fragile that you're worried about which thread is bumped on a pot website?

LOL No. 1,131,452 = 6.59% of total. but that's assuming detection rates haven't changed on a daily basis, which they almost certainly have gone way down. The math you're looking for, assuming 6.59% detection rate with today's number of confirmed cases is (6.59/100)1,131,452 = 17,169,227 Like...

My point with that argument was specific to Danes. The part about oxidative stress is relavant to that due to the fact that relevant comorbidities may occur at lower rates in the population of Denmark. Since all we have to go on are confirmed cases, Denmark or any country may simply have fewer...

Incorrect again. According to the study, on March 30th, 9% was the global average detection rate. The US detection rate was 6.59%. So you would multiply the number of cases confirmed on that day in the US with the estimated detection rate in the US. It would apply to that day, but a growth rate...

This is case stats. All of these numbers will come way down when seroprevalence is ascertained. The study did not report any deaths in children younger than 10, who represented less than 1% of the patients. https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-death-age-older-people-higher-risk-2020-2

No. It is not saying that the number which have been detected represent said percentage of the total who have been infected. It doesn't mean that percentage has been infected. 9% detection rate means we had detected 9% of infections on average globally as of March 30th. Numbers have snowballed...

Based on this growth rate, it would be conservative to say one out of every three in New York City has antibodies now and you'll see something claiming this within days.

Not a completely terrible formula but you're taking that 25% that is from samples that are now 9 days old (the 21% estimate is from samples now 20 days old) and applying it to current death stats. I would be willing to accept .5% as the IFR for NYC based on this as a worst case and with the fact...

THANKFULLY, North American and European governments are backing off from the failed lockdown policies that have ravaged economies and failed to contain the spread of the pandemic. https://ph.news.yahoo.com/se-asia-stocks-gain-easing-102008446.html

No, you're reading it wrong. And you're spamming the wrong thread and annoying the ever-living actual fuck out of me. That is global detection rate, not infection rate. You're completely lost. Just wait for the NIH study, you don't know what you're doing, you don't have enough to formulate.

Based on that model, you still cannot estimate global infections because you could multiply the infections in a country with a lot of infections and low detection rates and produce a number that is actually higher than if you were to multiply the average detection rate by the global number of...

That's the Vollmer and Bommer study I have posted repeatedly. That's a solid model but it's calculated based on March 31. The article that you posted also reads the study incorrectly. That's what you get by posting from a right-wing rag about a study that wasn't the one you based your previous...

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/New-South-China-Sea-tensions-rattle-Manila-and-Hanoi-amid-pandemic?n_cid=NARAN185&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=infeed&utm_campaign=IC_custom_audience&utm_content=FB_dynamic_ads_CHINA&fbclid=IwAR1cH6AJLeHTicz22pfnGsPT3AVKNx1KRyWyfyn4tHDObl...

The boomer doomer certainly won't help Trump, he does better in higher age groups.

They're going to all be open long before there's a vaccine or herd immunity. I suggest all boomers isolate themselves so as not to die while the able continue having a society.

It included no such claim that teh US has 5% seroprevalence. What the fuck are you even talking about?

Biden is going to be in trouble if he doesn't get some really strong support.