Poll: Republicans - Saviors, or Deranged Conspiracy Theorists?

Saviors, or Conspiracy Theorists?


  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
IRS, DOJ, NSA, Benghazi conspiracies, that they would lead us to believe the Obama administration is supposedly guilty of being a part of, seem to be the new GOP mantra. Or, are they just trying to lift the wool from our "ignorant eyes", and open them up to the "obvious deflection" from the "real issues" that are at hand.

What the conspiratorial mind sees as misinformation and lies, others see as merely perfectly ordinary incomplete and inaccurate information following a multifaceted tragedy. Pundits, and reporters can misspeak, or be given incorrect information.

Not every single statement about what occurred, from dozens of different people in different places at different times, will agree in every detail. Three different witnesses to a minor car accident will often give three slightly different accounts of what they saw, so it's unrealistic to expect people who were actually involved in the process to be able to corroborate 100% about anything, especially ONE specific detail.

Part of the reason that conspiracy theories linger is that any contradictory evidence — no matter how conclusive or compelling — can just be dismissed by claiming that it's part of the cover-up. There is ultimately no evidence that would satisfy most conspiracy theorists. Those who distrust the government will use any excuse to support their beliefs, logical or not.

Conspiracy theorists prefer complex mysteries over simple truths, and find mystery where none exists.

Research has shown not only that a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is likely to support others, but also contradictions don't deter conspiracy theorists.

Discuss.
 
IRS, DOJ, NSA, Benghazi conspiracies, that they would lead us to believe the Obama administration is supposedly guilty of being a part of, seem to be the new GOP mantra. Or, are they just trying to lift the wool from our "ignorant eyes", and open them up to the "obvious deflection" from the "real issues" that are at hand.

What the conspiratorial mind sees as misinformation and lies, others see as merely perfectly ordinary incomplete and inaccurate information following a multifaceted tragedy. Pundits, and reporters can misspeak, or be given incorrect information.

Not every single statement about what occurred, from dozens of different people in different places at different times, will agree in every detail. Three different witnesses to a minor car accident will often give three slightly different accounts of what they saw, so it's unrealistic to expect people who were actually involved in the process to be able to corroborate 100% about anything, especially ONE specific detail.

Part of the reason that conspiracy theories linger is that any contradictory evidence — no matter how conclusive or compelling — can just be dismissed by claiming that it's part of the cover-up. There is ultimately no evidence that would satisfy most conspiracy theorists. Those who distrust the government will use any excuse to support their beliefs, logical or not.

Conspiracy theorists prefer complex mysteries over simple truths, and find mystery where none exists.

Research has shown not only that a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is likely to support others, but also contradictions don't deter conspiracy theorists.

Discuss.

you should see the thread on obama/bill o'reilly..we've watched both left and right..the right seems to have different version from the left on those 10 minutes..how is this possible?
 
you can't govern a country from the pulpit..many, many people that vote don't like the bible and refuse to endorse those who wish to govern accordingly..

i don't understand why the right cannot see this..

dear righties, you want to be elected? keep the bible out of it..but you can't? can you?..

time for:

[video=youtube;AEOpX8tmiUI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI[/video]
 
you can't govern a country from the pulpit..many, many people that vote don't like the bible and refuse to endorse those who wish to govern accordingly..

i don't understand why the right cannot see this..

dear righties, you want to be elected? keep the bible out of it..but you can't? can you?..

time for:

[video=youtube;AEOpX8tmiUI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI[/video]

I watched all 10 hours of that gnarly vid. Still twice as informative as FOX "News".
 
you can't govern a country from the pulpit..many, many people that vote don't like the bible and refuse to endorse those who wish to govern accordingly..

i don't understand why the right cannot see this..

dear righties, you want to be elected? keep the bible out of it..but you can't? can you?..

time for:

[video=youtube;AEOpX8tmiUI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI[/video]

while I am not one of them, many on the right feel that the chief justice ought to compare stuff to the constitution and the bible. They also feel that the only way to govern is from the bible.

Good thing it is much more mild than Sharia Law.

But those folks have a right to voice their opinion, select candidates who have similar values, and run the country accordingly.

Good thing is many of them are getting older and dying and thus not voting anymore. The "moral majority" is now a minority and will lose its political pull within a couple more election cycles.
 
while I am not one of them, many on the right feel that the chief justice ought to compare stuff to the constitution and the bible. They also feel that the only way to govern is from the bible.

Good thing it is much more mild than Sharia Law.

But those folks have a right to voice their opinion, select candidates who have similar values, and run the country accordingly.

Good thing is many of them are getting older and dying and thus not voting anymore. The "moral majority" is now a minority and will lose its political pull within a couple more election cycles.


so then i was correct when i said i couldn't wait for all the old white men to die off to which desert dud, red took such offense to..meantime, we'll be there straightening out this fucking replicunt mess..have you noticed that polls on what the constituent approves of is at the 80-90 percentile on many issues, yet you have those like ted cruz who represent only the 10th percentile and acts like its the 80-90 percentile he represents and agrees with him.

why so quiet now teddy?:lol:
 
Back
Top