Pix That Make You LOL-Warning-SNWS

cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Chunky Stool said:
Selective outrage, LOL.

But I admire your chivalry.

(OK, I lied. (:)
Click to expand...
Chunky Stool said:
Why?
I don't owe you a favor.

Are you "very upset right now"?

Hugs & Kisses :P
Click to expand...
Tell me why you practice selective outrage. It is not an adult quality.

The second quote was your response to a legitimate request for your data. The noninformational but emotionally charged reply you gave is the classic indicator of having no objective argument.
Chunky Stool said:
:clap:
Is Penelope your favorite SNL character?

Just curious.
Click to expand...
Another inflammatory non sequitur. You really are not very good at this.
 
Chunky Stool

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Tell me why you practice selective outrage. It is not an adult quality.

The second quote was your response to a legitimate request for your data. The noninformational but emotionally charged reply you gave is the classic indicator of having no objective argument.

Another inflammatory non sequitur. You really are not very good at this.
Click to expand...
LOL
Looks like I'm not the only one who isn't "good at this".

Whatever "this" is... :roll:
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Chunky Stool said:
LOL
Looks like I'm not the only one who isn't "good at this".

Whatever "this" is... :roll:
Click to expand...
Are you sure you don't want to take a step back and closely inspect what you said and what Pablo said? Are you willing to see the basic difference between the two? Or will you be satisfied providing the irritainment of your intellectual incontinence?
 
Chunky Stool

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Are you sure you don't want to take a step back and closely inspect what you said and what Pablo said? Are you willing to see the basic difference between the two? Or will you be satisfied providing the irritainment of your intellectual incontinence?
Click to expand...
I do not have the energy to explain this to you again.
You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

The latest round was simply pointing out the obvious hypocrisy involving *two* people.

I thought you were smarter than this.

Hugs & Kisses
 
curious2garden

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Chunky Stool said:
I do not have the energy to explain this to you again.
You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

The latest round was simply pointing out the obvious hypocrisy involving *two* people.

I thought you were smarter than this.

Hugs & Kisses
Click to expand...
You miss nuance then call other people names. Hopefully with the sinus infection cleared your brain can re-expand.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Chunky Stool said:
I do not have the energy to explain this to you again.
You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

The latest round was simply pointing out the obvious hypocrisy involving *two* people.

I thought you were smarter than this.

Hugs & Kisses
Click to expand...
The fact that you are unwilling to specify the hypocrisy you perceive tells me that even you aren't sure what you're on about. Your obstinate refusal to recognize the actual elements of the event, and the very private interpretation you then try to pound home as the actual version, informs me that you are just not in the intellectual weight class needed to participate in any argument that requires some brainpower.

If you have an actual point to make in this instance, illustrate it with quotes from the actual event, and provide a specific analysis. You're using vague suggestive terms, and that is "instant fail" in any ordered discussion. Chanting "hypocrite" without effectively backing the accusation has a way of recoiling on the chanter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top