Dr. Bob
Well-Known Member
Your statement is not illuminating. We know what section 8 says. Your assertion is that if you make the prongs, and the prosecutor cannot refute them, the defense is deemed valid.
Ranks right up there in value with 'If I pick the right numbers, I will win the lottery'. Also a true statement. Apparently you don't see that. Making a generic statement like that says nothing. You have to pick the right numbers and satisfy the prongs. Good luck trying to do that with your document.
I specifically challenged you to present the actual and specific words of a lawyer that reviewed your 'document' and was willing to go on record to say it would protect an unregistered caregiver, defeating the challenges of the prosecutor. You present it as a valid strategy, show me an attorney that will go on record saying it stands a reasonable chance of working in court.
Dr. Bob
Ranks right up there in value with 'If I pick the right numbers, I will win the lottery'. Also a true statement. Apparently you don't see that. Making a generic statement like that says nothing. You have to pick the right numbers and satisfy the prongs. Good luck trying to do that with your document.
I specifically challenged you to present the actual and specific words of a lawyer that reviewed your 'document' and was willing to go on record to say it would protect an unregistered caregiver, defeating the challenges of the prosecutor. You present it as a valid strategy, show me an attorney that will go on record saying it stands a reasonable chance of working in court.
Dr. Bob