Recent content by ricky1lung

Take some extra time to read. You've missed the whole point of allowing homegrows and providing a list of approved dg's (lp's) which would completely be in line with this ruling and the laws.

It won't be. So let's have a realistic discussion. We know under the new rule set homegrows and some form of dg's need to be allowed. I think we know what homegrows cover already, so what could the rest of the program look like. How will they cover the interests of all involved. Money talks...

I agree, they should. I just think the dg rules are in for a big change considering all that's involved. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

It's not home grows I'm worried about. It's what they might do to force lp's again. I know homegrows can be safe and the fear mongering is bs. You can have as many ferns in your house as you want and never be called out for fire or mold concerns. IMO they will legislate and be careful to...

Unfortunately reasonable does not mean exclusive access to free or cheap meds. Reasonable is just allowing people easy access. May that be home grows or an approved producer. There will be a need for some dg's outside of lp's, but that might be limited to residents of the dwelling or land which...

Reasonable access = ability to self produce and allowing someone else to produce if the patient cannot. Reasonable access to "medication" does not mean any Tom dick and Harry can grow "medicine". The gov could set restrictions on who can become a dg and grow approved "medicine" and provide a...

It takes away the ability to choose just anyone. They can do it and get away with it by legislating that only licenced producers could be deemed dg's. I'm not saying it's fair or ideal, just that it's possible and people should be talking about the possibility of the next round of rules. Over...

It's a possible scenario. I was clear in saying I was speculating but the possibility is very real. If no one talks about it, no one prepares. Side note: he's not a big guy. He thinks he is, but, he's still a little guy with an attitude and a mouth to some guys.

There may be some who grow outdoors where it's not allowed, that would draw an enforcement officer to go out. Quality inspections on home grows aren't needed, compliance to code and bylaws most certainly is. I can't see them sending inspectors out to every grow, just those who have non...

Homegrown there's no need. Unless it were for local bylaws. A commercial product sold or provided as medication would have to be or should be regulated in some way.

Thinks he's big lol

Under the "you can grow your own or buy from approved sources" basis. They don't have to allow just anyone to grow, they have a list of approved producers already and all they really have to do by law is give you a list of dg's to choose from. They don't have to allow just anyone to supply...

You have no idea. You know nothing of me, not even my name. I know plenty about you, including where you buy your crack. Have at it hoss, lose again.

Has everyone forgotten why this ruling was even needed? The gov at the time crafted laws and regulations to suit their agenda without regard for laws. Don't think something similar could happen again? Yes, they can stack the deck within the new guidelines. How easily people forget. Jump on...

Does jt still own tweed son? Still smoking crack from the circle?