Will a gun ban actually work?

I'd love to see cops show up at people's house and try to take their guns. See how many of them leave with their life.
 
But "assault weapon" is not a real term. It was ginned up by the antis.

I find it remarkable that CA won't allow me to load nuisance loads using white chunky projectiles. Perhaps because it would turn a 12-gauge double into a salt weapon. cn

The term "assault weapon" I take to include a varried list of weapons that have no real sporting or person defence purpose. I know you can kill someone with a nailgun if you so desire, but that's not it's intended purpose.
Assault weapons don't belong on the streets.
 
You do understand that they can ban assault weapons, assault looking weapons all they want, but they will NEVER EVER EVER be able to make the ones that already exist illegal to own.
WHAT? Are you telling me that if they were made illegal, all the criminals wouldn't just go turn them in? LOL!
 
The term "assault weapon" I take to include a varried list of weapons that have no real sporting or person defence purpose. I know you can kill someone with a nailgun if you so desire, but that's not it's intended purpose.
Assault weapons don't belong on the streets.



In your little mind they dont.
And again NO such thing as a assault weapon!
 
WHAT? Are you telling me that if they were made illegal, all the criminals wouldn't just go turn them in? LOL!
No, what I am saying is that they are prohibited from making things that are legal to own now, illegal to own in the future.
 
I'd love to see cops show up at people's house and try to take their guns. See how many of them leave with their life.

I think if a ban (highly doubtful) happens, as soon as people see it on the news there will be a riot outside before the cops get to do anything. I think the government knows this too.
 
The term "assault weapon" I take to include a varried list of weapons that have no real sporting or person defence purpose. I know you can kill someone with a nailgun if you so desire, but that's not it's intended purpose.
Assault weapons don't belong on the streets.

"Assault rifle" is a legitimate term of the soldier's art.
"Assault weapon" is a chimera devised by journalists.
And perhaps allow the customer to determine if a given gun meets a defensive need. Typically the military choose their weapons for utility, and that sets the baseline for civilian utility. Jmo. cn
 
A-vzj54CIAAS7Aw.jpg:large

Only the Messiah and Diane Feinstein need guns.
 
No, what I am saying is that they are prohibited from making things that are legal to own now, illegal to own in the future.

Apparently California isn't part of the United States? Ever since Feinstein's BFF, Harvey Milk, got shot dead, you get get more time than a rapist, murderer and tax dodger, combined, if you have an 11 round mag or more. Even if you owned it before Milk died.
 
I ancient Japan they lived very close together & had a real problem with fires. If a fire got started in one house it would quickly spread & usually burned the whole town down. There solution was simple: if you started a fire, they executed your entire family.......this kept repeat offenders down, and really had everybody in the house watching crazy old uncle harry, to make sure he doesn't get ahold of any matches!

So, everybody lives in the dark, cold house and eats cold, raw food?
 
But "assault weapon" is not a real term. It was ginned up by the antis.

I find it remarkable that CA won't allow me to load nuisance loads using white chunky projectiles. Perhaps because it would turn a 12-gauge double into a salt weapon. cn

LOL, good one.
 
Back
Top