Peter Strzok used nasty words to describe Donald Trump ...are there any nice ones ?

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
It's to keep us distracted so we don't question events like Sandy Hook, Columbine MSF High... etc,

If you ever doubted whether it was a psyop. Notice it's on a new video channel which was started because of YT censorship. This is but one example of governments gun agenda, but ther are many in different categories exposing the lies and real intent of government) things that prove conclusively that our government (both parties) collectively want to control the crap out of us and will resort to this as well as real events oh and don't forget banksters wars, which keep them all in biness

https://www.real.video/5807994769001
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's to keep us distracted so we don't question events like Sandy Hook, Columbine MSF High... etc,

If you ever doubted whether it was a psyop. Notice it's on a new video channel which was started because of YT censorship. This is but one example of governments gun agenda, but ther are many in different categories exposing the lies and real intent of government) things that prove conclusively that our government (both parties) collectively want to control the crap out of us and will resort to this as well as real events oh and don't forget banksters wars, which keep them all in biness

https://www.real.video/5807994769001
You need therapy
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It's to keep us distracted so we don't question events like Sandy Hook, Columbine MSF High... etc,

If you ever doubted whether it was a psyop. Notice it's on a new video channel which was started because of YT censorship. This is but one example of governments gun agenda, but ther are many in different categories exposing the lies and real intent of government) things that prove conclusively that our government (both parties) collectively want to control the crap out of us and will resort to this as well as real events oh and don't forget banksters wars, which keep them all in biness

https://www.real.video/5807994769001
Now Columbine is a conspiracy?

Lol

So much for anyone ever taking you seriously again!
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
I think Strzok comes across as honest. He can't see his own bias, but a good guy, patriot. Trump is just a clever con man with the great fortune of running against Hillary. Todays hearing was good for Strzok, just way too long, even with some entertaining hyperbole from both sides.
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
I think Strzok comes across as honest. He can't see his own bias, but a good guy, patriot. Trump is just a clever con man with the great fortune of running against Hillary. Todays hearing was good for Strzok, just way too long, even with some entertaining hyperbole from both sides.
he admitted he doesn't really care for Trump. But where he really grabbed Republicans by the balls and really shut their whole act down was with his actions.

Even Gowdy when he tried to have his AHA! moment got shot down by the same IG report he kept trying to reference (which said that the agents showed too much bias in their communications) said that the handling of matters, their ACTIONS, were reasonable.... and when Republicans tried to put words in his mouth or flip what he was saying into something he was not Democrats really came together to rally against what was obvious political pandering....

And when the Chair tried to threaten him with Contempt because he couldn't answer a question - Democrats were amazing in their responses: Can we also consider charging Steve Bannon with contempt for refusing to answer questions without any legal basis?

And they filed a motion which was received without objection to bring Bannon back to the hot seat - that to me was the climax of the whole deal.....
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
he admitted he doesn't really care for Trump. But where he really grabbed Republicans by the balls and really shut their whole act down was with his actions.

Even Gowdy when he tried to have his AHA! moment got shot down by the same IG report he kept trying to reference (which said that the agents showed too much bias in their communications) said that the handling of matters, their ACTIONS, were reasonable.... and when Republicans tried to put words in his mouth or flip what he was saying into something he was not Democrats really came together to rally against what was obvious political pandering....

And when the Chair tried to threaten him with Contempt because he couldn't answer a question - Democrats were amazing in their responses: Can we also consider charging Steve Bannon with contempt for refusing to answer questions without any legal basis?

And they filed a motion which was received without objection to bring Bannon back to the hot seat - that to me was the climax of the whole deal.....
Yeah, I agree, win for Strzok, loss for repubs.
 
Top